Impact of the Sloping Land Conversion Program on rural household income: An integrated estimation

The objective of this study is to identify the pathways of the potential impacts of the Sloping Land Conversion Program (SLCP) on household income and quantify these impacts along the identified pathways. We fulfill this objective by developing an integrated analytic framework and using data collected from Wuqi county of Shaanxi for the period 2004–2010. This integrated analytic framework enables us to formulate a structural equation model for testing hypotheses regarding the direct and indirect impacts of the SLCP. It is found that the direct effect of the SLCP on household income is positive but very small and insignificant, suggesting that retiring cropland has, at least, not reduced income from farming. Moreover, the SLCP has had a much higher and even increasing indirect impact on household income through promoting labor transfer and relaxing liquidity constraints. Overall, the SLCP's total impact on household income ranged from 3% in 2004 to 9% in 2010 excluding the insignificant direct impact. The research and policy implications of our work are discussed.

[1]  Runsheng Yin,et al.  China’s Primary Programs of Terrestrial Ecosystem Restoration: Initiation, Implementation, and Challenges , 2010, Environmental management.

[2]  David L. Tschirley,et al.  Wildlife Conservation in Zambia: Impacts on Rural Household Welfare , 2012 .

[3]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Some Methods for Respecifying Measurement Models to Obtain Unidimensional Construct Measurement , 1982 .

[4]  S. Pagiola,et al.  Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America , 2005 .

[5]  Andreas Kontoleon,et al.  Relaxing rural constraints: a ‘win-win’ policy for poverty and environment in China? , 2010 .

[6]  J. Bennett,et al.  Livelihood impacts of the conversion of cropland to forest and grassland program , 2006 .

[7]  Shunbo Yao,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of China’s Land Conversion Program on Farmers’ Income Growth and Labor Transfer , 2010, Environmental management.

[8]  S. Rozelle,et al.  Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints, and Off‐Farm Labor: Impact of the Grain‐For‐Green Program on Rural Households in China , 2008 .

[9]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[10]  Jikun Huang,et al.  Employment, Emerging Labor Markets, and the Role of Education in Rural China , 2002 .

[11]  Ran Tao,et al.  China's Sloping Land Conversion Programme Four Years on: Current Situation, Pending Issues , 2004 .

[12]  Shunbo Yao,et al.  Agricultural Productivity Changes Induced by the Sloping Land Conversion Program: An Analysis of Wuqi County in the Loess Plateau Region , 2010, Environmental management.

[13]  R. Yin,et al.  Assessing China’s Ecological Restoration Programs: What’s Been Done and What Remains to Be Done? , 2010, Environmental management.

[14]  Michael T. Bennett,et al.  China's sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? , 2008 .

[15]  R. Yin,et al.  An Estimation of the Effects of China’s Priority Forestry Programs on Farmers’ Income , 2010, Environmental management.

[16]  R. Yin,et al.  The implementation and impacts of China's largest payment for ecosystem services program as revealed by longitudinal household data , 2014 .

[17]  Virginia Maclaren,et al.  Evaluation of economic and social impacts of the sloping land conversion program: A case study in Dunhua County, China , 2012 .

[18]  Lina Song,et al.  Towards a Labour Market in China , 2005 .

[19]  Minjuan Zhao,et al.  Ecological restoration programs and payments for ecosystem services as integrated biophysical and socioeconomic processes—China's experience as an example , 2012 .

[20]  C. Chi,et al.  Examining the structural relationships of destination image, tourist satisfaction and destination loyalty: An integrated approach , 2008 .

[21]  Shixiong Cao,et al.  An Investigation of Chinese Attitudes toward the Environment: Case Study Using the Grain for Green Project , 2009, Ambio.

[22]  Y Kano,et al.  Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Pamela A Matson,et al.  Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[25]  S. Rozelle,et al.  Grain for Green: Cost-Effectiveness and Sustainability of China’s Conservation Set-Aside Program , 2005, Land Economics.

[26]  William L. Parish,et al.  Nonfarm Work and Marketization of the Chinese Countryside , 1995, The China Quarterly.

[27]  Myoung‐jae Lee.  Micro-Econometrics for Policy, Program, and Treatment Effects , 2005 .