Backstroke start performance: the impact of using the Omega OBL2 backstroke ledge

Abstract FINA recently approved the backstroke ledge (Omega OBL2) to improve backstroke start performance in competition, but its performance has not been thoroughly evaluated. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanics of starts performed with and without the OBL2. Ten high-level backstroke swimmers performed three starts with, and three starts without, the OBL2. A wall-mounted force plate measured the lower limb horizontal impulse, vertical impulse, take-off velocity and take-off angle. Entry distance, time to 10 m and start of hip and knee extension were recorded using video cameras. Starts performed with the OBL2 had a 0.13 s lower time to 10 m, 2.5% less variability in time to 10 m and 0.14 m greater head entry distance. The OBL2 provides a performance advantage by allowing an increased head entry distance rather than larger horizontal impulse on the wall. This may be due to the swimmers assuming different body positions during the start manoeuvre. Additional studies are needed to evaluate factors that contribute to improved performance when using the OBL2. Swimmers should train with the OBL2 and use it in competition to ensure optimal start performance.

[1]  G Atkinson,et al.  Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports Medicine , 1998, Sports medicine.

[2]  Andrew Dragunas Factors Affecting Block Performance From The Omega OSB11 Starting Platform , 2015 .

[3]  J. Vilas-Boas,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of backstroke swimming starts. , 2011, International journal of sports medicine.

[4]  J. Vilas-Boas,et al.  The effect of different foot and hand set-up positions on backstroke start performance , 2016, Sports biomechanics.

[5]  João Paulo Vilas-Boas,et al.  Neuromuscular Activity of Upper and Lower Limbs during two Backstroke Swimming Start Variants. , 2015, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[6]  João Paulo Vilas-Boas,et al.  The Backstroke Swimming Start: State of the Art , 2014, Journal of human kinetics.

[7]  Andreas Hohmann,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BACKSTROKE START TECHNIQUE IN SWIMMING , 2008 .

[8]  Loren Z F Chiu,et al.  Proximal-to-Distal Sequencing in Vertical Jumping With and Without Arm Swing , 2014, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[9]  J. Vilas-Boas,et al.  Are the new starting block facilities beneficial for backstroke start performance? , 2016, Journal of sports sciences.

[10]  Elizabeth J. Bradshaw,et al.  Is starting with the feet out of the water faster in backstroke swimming? , 2014, Sports biomechanics.

[11]  Zoran Milanović,et al.  Differences in the Efficiency Between the Grab and Track Starts for Both Genders in Greek Young Swimmers , 2012, Journal of human kinetics.

[12]  Hideki Takagi,et al.  Kinematic analysis of the backstroke start: differences between backstroke specialists and non-specialists , 2014, Journal of sports sciences.

[13]  Nandini Chakravorti,et al.  The categorisation of swimming start performance with reference to force generation on the main block and footrest components of the Omega OSB11 start blocks , 2013, Journal of sports sciences.

[14]  John H Challis,et al.  Maximum height and minimum time vertical jumping. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Zachary J. Domire,et al.  Insights to vertical jumping from computer simulations , 2015 .

[16]  Ludovic Seifert,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of the swim-start: a review. , 2014, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[17]  Daniël Lakens,et al.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[18]  João Paulo Vilas-Boas,et al.  Backstroke start kinematic and kinetic changes due to different feet positioning , 2013, Journal of sports sciences.

[19]  Andrew Dragunas,et al.  A Comparison of Two Swimming Start Techniques from the Omega OSB11 Starting Block , 2012 .