Image forgery detection using Markov features in undecimated wavelet transform

Image forgery has become common due to the availability of high-quality image editing softwares. For detecting image forgery there is a need to have important features of the image. For obtaining the image features we need a suitable transform. One of the important and commonly used transform is discrete wavelet transform that can provide spatial and frequency related information of a signal. However, it provides ambiguous information due to its shift variant property. This ambiguity can be overcome using the UWT due to its shift invariance property. In forgery, some operations are applied to an image at different locations. For instance same type of details at different locations, the UWT provides the output of same nature, whereas the DWT doesn't. Due to this property, the features extracted in undecimated wavelet transform (UWT) domain provide better results in many applications like denoising, change detection, etc. In this paper, image features are extracted using the Markov model after transforming it into UWT domain. To evaluate the performance CASIA v1.0, Columbia Color and DSO-1 databases are used. The support vector machine with the linear kernel applied to separate the forged and pristine images. We experimentally obtain better results using the UWT transform as compared to the DWT transform on all these three databases.

[1]  Muhammad Ghulam,et al.  Image forgery detection using steerable pyramid transform and local binary pattern , 2013, Machine Vision and Applications.

[2]  Alessandro Piva,et al.  Image Forgery Localization via Block-Grained Analysis of JPEG Artifacts , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[3]  Muhammad Ghulam,et al.  Image forgery detection using multi-resolution Weber local descriptors , 2013, Eurocon 2013.

[4]  Jan Lukás,et al.  Detecting digital image forgeries using sensor pattern noise , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  P. K. Bora,et al.  Illuminant colour based image forensics using mismatch in human skin highlights , 2014, 2014 Twentieth National Conference on Communications (NCC).

[6]  Pin Zhang,et al.  Detecting Image Tampering Using Feature Fusion , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security.

[7]  Xuemin Wu,et al.  Image Splicing Detection Using Illuminant Color Inconsistency , 2011, 2011 Third International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security.

[8]  Wei Su,et al.  Image splicing detection using 2-D phase congruency and statistical moments of characteristic function , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Qiong Wu,et al.  Detection of Image Compositing Based on a Statistical Model for Natural Images , 2009 .

[10]  Tomás Pevný,et al.  Steganalysis by subtractive pixel adjacency matrix , 2010, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur..

[11]  Tomás Pevný,et al.  Steganalysis by Subtractive Pixel Adjacency Matrix , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[12]  Shaziya .P.S. Khan,et al.  Exposing Digital Image Forgeries by Illumination Color Classification , 2015 .

[13]  Wei Lu,et al.  Digital image splicing detection based on Markov features in DCT and DWT domain , 2012, Pattern Recognit..