Electron Tunneling and Electrochemical Currents through Interfacial Water Inside an STM Junction

The apparent barrier height for charge transfer through an interfacial water layer between a Pt/Ir tip and a gold surface has been measured using STM technique. The average thickness of the interfacial water layer inside an STM junction was controlled by the amount of moisture. A thin water layer on the surface was formed when relative humidity was in the range of 10 to 80%. In such a case, electron tunneling through the thin water layer became the majority of charge transfers. The value of the barrier height for the electron tunneling was determined to be 0.95 eV from the current vs. distance curve, which was independent of the tip-sample distance. On the other hand, the apparent barrier height for charge transfer showed a dependence on tip-sample distance in the bias range of 0.1-0.5 V at a relative humidity of approximately 96%. The non-exponentiality for current decay under these conditions has been explained in terms of electron tunneling and electrochemical processes. In addition, the plateau current was observed at a large tip-sample distance, which was caused by electrochemical processes and was dependent on the applied voltage.

[1]  L. Nd Resistance of a one-atom contact in the scanning tunneling microscope. , 1987 .

[2]  J. Gimzewski,et al.  Solvent dynamical effects in scanning tunneling microscopy with a polar liquid in the gap , 1991 .

[3]  Electron tunneling across an interfacial water layer inside an STM junction: tunneling distance, barrier height and water polarization effect , 1998 .

[4]  S. Lindsay,et al.  Tunneling Barriers in Electrochemical Scanning Tunneling Microscopy , 1994 .

[5]  Distance dependence and corrugation in barrier-height measurements on metal surfaces , 1992 .

[6]  W. Schmickler Tunneling of electrons through thin layers of water , 1995 .

[7]  R. Wiesendanger Scanning Probe Microscopy and Spectroscopy: Contents , 1994 .

[8]  Allen J. Bard,et al.  Controlled nanofabrication of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite with the scanning tunneling microscope , 1992 .

[9]  Jacobsen,et al.  Quantized conductance in an atom-sized point contact. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[10]  Clarke,et al.  Contamination-mediated deformation of graphite by the scanning tunneling microscope. , 1986, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[11]  V. M. Kenkre,et al.  Quantum coherence effects in the scanning tunneling microscope : a simple interpretation of contact resistance experiments , 1999 .

[12]  M Heim,et al.  Scanning tunneling microscopy of insulators and biological specimens based on lateral conductivity of ultrathin water films. , 1994, Science.

[13]  R. Guckenberger,et al.  STM on Wet Insulators: Electrochemistry or Tunneling? , 1995, Science.

[14]  S. Lindsay,et al.  Non-exponential tunneling in water near an electrode , 1995 .