Assessing the implementability of telehealth interventions for self-management support: a realist review

BackgroundThere is a substantial and continually growing literature on the effectiveness and implementation of discrete telehealth interventions for health condition management. However, it is difficult to predict which technologies are likely to work and be used in practice. In this context, identifying the core mechanisms associated with successful telehealth implementation is relevant to consolidating the likely elements for ensuring a priori optimal design and deployment of telehealth interventions for supporting patients with long-term conditions (LTCs).MethodsWe adopted a two-stage realist synthesis approach to identify the core mechanisms underpinning telehealth interventions. In the second stage of the review, we tested inductively and refined our understanding of the mechanisms. We reviewed qualitative papers focused on COPD, heart failure, diabetes, and behaviours and complications associated with these conditions. The review included 15 papers published 2009 to 2014.ResultsThree concepts were identified, which suggested how telehealth worked to engage and support health-related work. Whether or not and how a telehealth intervention enables or limits the possibility for relationships with professionals and/or peers. Telehealth has the potential to reshape and extend existing relationships, acting as a partial substitute for the role of health professionals. The second concept is fit: successful telehealth interventions are those that can be well integrated into everyday life and health care routines and the need to be easy to use, compatible with patients’ existing environment, skills, and capacity, and that do not significantly disrupt patients’ lives and routines. The third concept is visibility: visualisation of symptoms and feedback has the capacity to improve knowledge, motivation, and a sense of empowerment; engage network members; and reinforce positive behaviour change, prompts for action and surveillance.ConclusionsUpfront consideration should be given to the mechanisms that are most likely to ensure the successful development and implementation of telehealth interventions. These include considerations about whether and how the telehealth intervention enables or limits the possibility for relationships with professionals and peers, how it fits with existing environment and capacities to self-manage, and visibility-enabling-enhanced awareness to self and others.

[1]  Louise Laframboise,et al.  A Technological Life Buoy: Patient Perceptions of the Health Buddy , 2009, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[2]  R. Bischoff,et al.  Telehealth and rural depression: physician and patient perspectives. , 2009, Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare.

[3]  Jan Koetsenruijter,et al.  The influence of social networks on self-management support: a metasynthesis , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[4]  Clare Liddy,et al.  Telehomecare for patients with multiple chronic illnesses: Pilot study. , 2008, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[5]  Martin Knapp,et al.  Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[6]  Sanjay Arora,et al.  Gender Differences in Diabetes Self-Management: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of a Mobile Health Intervention for Inner-City Latino Patients , 2013, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[7]  J. Powell,et al.  Stakeholder Perspectives on the Development of a Virtual Clinic for Diabetes Care: Qualitative Study , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  Eirik Årsand,et al.  Improving Diabetes Care for Young People With Type 1 Diabetes Through Visual Learning on Mobile Phones: Mixed-Methods Study , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[10]  F. Griffiths,et al.  Why Are Health Care Interventions Delivered Over the Internet? A Systematic Review of the Published Literature , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  Michael Mackert,et al.  Designing e-health interventions for low-health-literate culturally diverse parents: addressing the obesity epidemic. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[12]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Telemonitoring for chronic heart failure: the views of patients and healthcare professionals - a qualitative study. , 2014, Journal of clinical nursing.

[13]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Piloting tele-monitoring in COPD: a mixed methods exploration of issues in design and implementation. , 2011, Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group.

[14]  Christian Nøhr,et al.  Under Surveillance, Yet Looked After: Telehomecare as Viewed by Patients and Their Spouse/Partners , 2008, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  W. Palmas,et al.  A qualitative study of the experiences and satisfaction of direct telemedicine providers in diabetes case management. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[17]  M. T. Høybye,et al.  Online interaction. Effects of storytelling in an internet breast cancer support group , 2005 .

[18]  G. Scambler Habermas, Critical Theory and Health , 2001 .

[19]  M. T. Høybye,et al.  Online interaction. Effects of storytelling in an internet breast cancer support group , 2005, Psycho-oncology.

[20]  Elsa Marziali,et al.  E-health program for patients with chronic disease. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[21]  Bridgette Wessels,et al.  Examining the use of telehealth in community nursing: identifying the factors affecting frontline staff acceptance and telehealth adoption. , 2015, Journal of advanced nursing.

[22]  Emma P Bray,et al.  Patients' experiences of self-monitoring blood pressure and self-titration of medication: the TASMINH2 trial qualitative study. , 2012, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[23]  J. Kvedar,et al.  Diabetes Connected Health: A Pilot Study of a Patient- and Provider-Shared Glucose Monitoring Web Application , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[24]  Sanjay Arora,et al.  Perceptions of Successful Cues to Action and Opportunities to Augment Behavioral Triggers in Diabetes Self-Management: Qualitative Analysis of a Mobile Intervention for Low-Income Latinos With Diabetes , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[25]  C. Pagliari,et al.  Continuity, but at what cost? The impact of telemonitoring COPD on continuities of care: a qualitative study. , 2012, Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group.

[26]  E. Balas,et al.  Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[27]  R. Bentall,et al.  The centrality of personal relationships in the creation and amelioration of mental health problems: the current interdisciplinary case , 2009, Health.

[28]  J. Protheroe,et al.  Social networks, work and network-based resources for the management of long-term conditions: a framework and study protocol for developing self-care support , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[29]  Egon Toft,et al.  Attitudes of COPD Patients towards Tele-Rehabilitation: A Cross-Sector Case Study , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[30]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  Exploring telemonitoring and self-management by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study embedded in a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Patient education and counseling.

[31]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges for Smartphone Applications in Supporting Health Behavior Change: Qualitative Study , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[32]  A. Kennedy,et al.  The Contribution of Social Networks to the Health and Self-Management of Patients with Long-Term Conditions: A Longitudinal Study , 2014, PloS one.

[33]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Patients' perceptions of a home telecare system , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[34]  D. Anthony Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective , 2007 .

[35]  Paul Wallace,et al.  Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[36]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Usability Evaluation of an Online, Tailored Self-Management Intervention for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Incorporating Behavior Change Techniques , 2013, JMIR research protocols.

[37]  S. Jaglal,et al.  Spanning boundaries into remote communities: an exploration of experiences with telehealth chronic disease self-management programs in rural northern ontario, Canada. , 2013, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[38]  E. Krupinski,et al.  The taxonomy of telemedicine. , 2011, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[39]  C. Salisbury,et al.  Roles and identities in transition: boundaries of work and inter-professional relationships at the interface between telehealth and primary care. , 2013, Health & social care in the community.

[40]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Health and Illness in a Connected World: How Might Sharing Experiences on the Internet Affect People's Health? , 2012, The Milbank quarterly.

[41]  M. Tennant,et al.  Dismantling sociocultural barriers to eye care with tele-ophthalmology: lessons from an Alberta Cree community. , 2013, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[42]  Jeannette Pols,et al.  Innovation and evaluation: taming and unleashing telecare technology. , 2011, Sociology of health & illness.

[43]  Carolyn Chew-Graham,et al.  The use of mixed methodology in evaluating complex interventions: identifying patient factors that moderate the effects of a decision aid. , 2007, Family practice.

[44]  Surinder Kaur,et al.  Primary‐care patients’ expectations and experiences of online cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a qualitative study , 2009, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.