Systematic prostate biopsies are more and more often becoming saturation biopsies.

The transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy techniques have changed drastically over the years from the original Hodge sextant biopsy protocol. Before the end of the second millennium, several authors had already shown limitations in cancer detection with sextant biopsy and had reported high rates of false-negative biopsies. Thus, Hodge’s scheme became soon obsolete. In the last 5 yr, different prostatic schemes with 8 or 10 or 12 biopsies have been proposed as a new standard of reference, as emerging evidence suggested that taking >6 biopsies might have significantly increased the rate of cancer detection [1]. Nevertheless, prostate cancer detection is still an area currently fraught with many unanswered questions and much controversy. The optimal number of biopsies needed to identify all patients with prostate cancer at the earliest stage possible for optimal treatment, outcome, and survival is still not known. Prostate volume is one of the factors that may influence the prediction of cancer at first biopsy. There is a significant inverse relationship between the cancer detection rate and prostate volume and it has been shown that the yield of sextant biopsy decreases with increasing prostate volume. Mathematical models and computer simulation of prostatic biopsies demonstrate that it is necessary to increase the number of biopsies according to prostate volume especially in younger patients [1]. However, it is not clear how many

[1]  W. Fair,et al.  Indications for transition zone biopsy in the detection of prostatic carcinoma. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[2]  M. Pea,et al.  The potential impact of prostate volume in the planning of optimal number of cores in the systematic transperineal prostate biopsy. , 2005, European urology.

[3]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Perianal and intrarectal anaesthesia for transrectal biopsy of the prostate: a prospective randomized study comparing lidocaine‐prilocaine cream and placebo , 2005, BJU international.

[4]  N. Shinohara,et al.  Differences in tumor core distribution between palpable and nonpalpable prostate tumors in patients diagnosed using extensive transperineal ultrasound‐guided template prostate biopsy , 2005, Cancer.

[5]  Francesco Montorsi,et al.  Prostatic Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Guided Biopsy Schemes and TRUS Prostatic Lesion-Guided Biopsies , 2002 .

[6]  M. Pea,et al.  Needle core length is a quality indicator of systematic transperineal prostate biopsy. , 2006, European urology.

[7]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Are transition zone biopsies still necessary to improve prostate cancer detection? Results from the tyrol screening project. , 2005, European urology.

[8]  K. Sheir,et al.  Is transition zone biopsy valuable in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with serum prostate-specific antigen >10 ng/ml and prior negative peripheral zone biopsy? , 2005, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[9]  R. Autorino,et al.  How to decrease pain during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a look at the literature. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[10]  T. Koyanagi,et al.  Difference of cancer core distribution between first and repeat biopsy: In patients diagnosed by extensive transperineal ultrasound guided template prostate biopsy , 2004, The Prostate.