Environment effects and surface roughness on fatigue crack growth at negative R-ratios

Abstract Fatigue crack growth has been widely studied, since it plays an important role on the damage tolerance analysis of mechanical components and structures. The environment, material properties and stress ratio significantly influence the fatigue crack growth behaviour of materials. Experimental tests were performed in M(T) specimens of a normalized DIN Ck45 steel at constant load ratios for R  = 0.7, 0.5, 0, −1, −2, −3, in ambient air and vacuum conditions, using a new and patented chamber of vacuum. Special emphasis is given to the study of environment effects, stress ratios and related effects of crack roughness. Fracture surface roughness and crack closure effect were systematically measured for all tests in order to compare the influence of different environment and R -ratios. Results have shown that fatigue crack growth rates are higher in air than in vacuum and the fracture surface roughness is also higher in air than in vacuum for comparable stress ratios. The effect of the environment on fatigue crack growth rates seems to be more significant than any mechanical contributions such as plasticity, oxide and roughness which can induce the so-called crack closure .

[1]  Subra Suresh,et al.  ON THE INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENT ON THE LOAD RATIO DEPENDENCE OF FATIGUE THRESHOLDS IN PRESSURE VESSEL STEEL , 1983 .

[2]  S. Pommier,et al.  Effect of Overloads and Underloads on Fatigue Crack Growth and Interaction Effects , 2004 .

[3]  Ming Gao,et al.  Chemical and metallurgical aspects of environmentally assisted fatigue crack growth in 7075-T651 aluminum alloy , 1988 .

[4]  G. Marci,et al.  A Fatigue Crack Growth Threshold. , 1992 .

[5]  M. de Freitas,et al.  The effect of microstructure and environment on fatigue crack growth in 7049 aluminium alloy at negative stress ratios , 2003 .

[6]  B. Holper,et al.  Near threshold fatigue crack growth in aluminium alloys at low and ultrasonic frequency: Influences of specimen thickness, strain rate, slip behaviour and air humidity , 2003 .

[7]  The microstructure and environment influence on fatigue crack growth in 7049 aluminum alloy at different load ratios , 2001 .

[8]  K. Sadananda,et al.  A theoretical evaluation of crack closure , 1993, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[9]  Henry Eyring,et al.  Hydrogen in metals , 1948 .

[10]  W. Elber.  The Significance of Fatigue Crack Closure , 1971 .

[11]  S. Dinda,et al.  Correlation and prediction of fatigue crack growth for different R-ratios using Kmax and ΔK+ parameters , 2004 .

[12]  S. Suresh,et al.  Mechanisms of Slow Fatigue Crack Growth in High Strength Aluminum Alloys: Role of Microstructure and Environment , 1984 .

[13]  J. Lankford,et al.  The effects of aluminum alloy microstructure on fatigue crack growth , 1985 .

[14]  Sylvie Pommier,et al.  Plane strain crack closure and cyclic hardening , 2002 .

[15]  Filipe S. Silva,et al.  Crack closure inadequacy at negative stress ratios , 2004 .

[16]  K. Sadananda,et al.  A REVIEW OF CRACK CLOSURE, FATIGUE CRACK THRESHOLD AND RELATED PHENOMENA , 1994 .

[17]  D. Duquette,et al.  The role of hydrogen in corrosion fatigue of high purity Al-Zn-Mg exposed to water vapor , 1988 .

[18]  B. R. Kirby,et al.  SLOW FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH AND THRESHOLD BEHAVIOUR IN AIR AND VACUUM OF COMMERCIAL ALUMINIUM ALLOYS , 1979 .

[19]  J. Lankford,et al.  Fatigue crack micromechanisms in ingot and powder metallurgy 7xxx aluminum alloys in air and vacuum , 1983 .

[20]  R. C. McClung,et al.  Advances in fatigue crack closure measurement and analysis: Second volume. ASTM special technical publication 1343 , 1999 .