Adaptation affects both high and low (subitized) numbers under conditions of high attentional load.

It has recently been reported that, like most sensory systems, numerosity is subject to adaptation. However, the effect seemed to be limited to numerosity estimation outside the subitizing range. In this study we show that low numbers, clearly in the subitizing range, are adaptable under conditions of high attentional load. These results support the idea that numerosity is detected by a perceptual mechanism that operates over the entire range of numbers, supplemented by an attention-based system for small numbers (subitizing).

[1]  F. Durgin.  Texture density adaptation and visual number revisited , 2008, Current Biology.

[2]  E. Brannon,et al.  Monotonic Coding of Numerosity in Macaque Lateral Intraparietal Area , 2007, PLoS biology.

[3]  Carly J. Leonard,et al.  The role of attention in subitizing: Is the magical number 1? , 2008 .

[4]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Visual learning in the perception of texture: simple and contingent aftereffects of texture density. , 1996, Spatial vision.

[5]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[6]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Attentional blink , 2009, Scholarpedia.

[7]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  Spatial Attention Determines the Nature of Nonverbal Number Representation , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Chang Liu,et al.  Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Are Subitizing and Counting Implemented as Separate or Functionally Overlapping Processes? , 2002, NeuroImage.

[10]  David C Burr,et al.  Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[11]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[14]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Representation of the Quantity of Visual Items in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[15]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Does Subitizing Reflect Numerical Estimation? , 2022 .

[16]  D. Burr,et al.  A Visual Sense of Number , 2007, Current Biology.

[17]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[18]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  Modulating Attentional Load Affects Numerosity Estimation: Evidence against a Pre-Attentive Subitizing Mechanism , 2008, PloS one.

[19]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[20]  K. Shapiro,et al.  The attentional blink , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  A Candidate for the Attentional Bottleneck: Set-size Specific Modulation of the Right TPJ during Attentive Enumeration , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  E. Miller,et al.  Analog Numerical Representations in Rhesus Monkeys: Evidence for Parallel Processing , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Connectedness affects dot numerosity judgment: Implications for configural processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  J. Ross.  Visual Discrimination of Number without Counting , 2003, Perception.

[26]  A. Nieder.  Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation , 1999 .

[28]  Henry Railo,et al.  The role of attention in subitizing , 2008, Cognition.

[29]  Christian N. L. Olivers,et al.  Subitizing requires attention , 2008 .

[30]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. , 1995 .

[31]  D. Burr,et al.  Vision senses number directly. , 2009, Journal of vision.