Challenges Arising from Prerequisite Testing in Cybersecurity Games

Cybersecurity games are an attractive and popular method of active learning. However, the majority of current games are created for advanced players, which often leads to frustration in less experienced learners. Therefore, we decided to focus on a diagnostic assessment of participants entering the games. We assume that information about the players' knowledge, skills, and experience enables tutors or learning environments to suitably assist participants with game challenges and maximize learning in their virtual adventure. In this paper, we present a pioneering experiment examining the predictive value of a short quiz and self-assessment for identifying learners' readiness before playing a cybersecurity game. We hypothesized that these predictors would model players' performance. A linear regression analysis showed that the game performance can be accurately predicted by well-designed prerequisite testing, but not by self-assessment. At the same time, we identified major challenges related to the design of pretests for cybersecurity games: calibrating test questions with respect to the skills relevant for the game, minimizing the quiz's length while maximizing its informative value, and embedding the pretest in the game. Our results are relevant for educational researchers and cybersecurity instructors of students at all learning levels.

[1]  T. L. Janssen,et al.  Exploring game design for cybersecurity training , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER).

[2]  Thavamalar Govindasamy,et al.  Successful implementation of e-Learning: Pedagogical considerations , 2001, Internet High. Educ..

[3]  Jan Vykopal,et al.  KYPO Cyber Range: Design and Use Cases , 2017, ICSOFT.

[4]  Amy J. Ko,et al.  In-game assessments increase novice programmers' engagement and level completion speed , 2013, ICER.

[5]  Darwin P. Hunt,et al.  Human Self-Assessment in Multiple-Choice Testing , 1994 .

[6]  Eugene G. Kowch,et al.  Designing effective instruction , 2004 .

[7]  Jelena Mirkovic,et al.  Class Capture-the-Flag Exercises , 2014, 3GSE.

[8]  P. Wouters,et al.  A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games , 2013 .

[9]  Ian D. Beatty,et al.  Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching , 2005, physics/0508114.

[10]  Diana L. Burley,et al.  Engaging learners in cybersecurity careers: lessons from the launch of the national cyber league , 2014, INROADS.

[11]  Zachary N. J. Peterson,et al.  Talking about Talking about Cybersecurity Games , 2016, login Usenix Mag..

[12]  Mun Yong Yi,et al.  Gamification of Online Learning , 2015, AIED.

[13]  Nickolai Zeldovich,et al.  Experiences in Cyber Security Education: The MIT Lincoln Laboratory Capture-the-Flag Exercise , 2011, CSET.

[14]  Rudolf van der Velden,et al.  The role of self-assessment in measuring skills , 2005 .

[15]  Domingo Verano-Tacoronte,et al.  Is University Students’ Self-Assessment Accurate? , 2015 .

[16]  Simon S. Woo,et al.  Engaging Novices in Cybersecurity Competitions: A Vision and Lessons Learned at ACM Tapia 2015 , 2015 .

[17]  Peter Beike,et al.  Teaching Today A Practical Guide , 2016 .

[18]  Petrus A.M. Kommers Cognitive Support for Learning: Imagining the Unknown , 2004 .

[19]  David H. Tobey,et al.  An Argument for Game Balance: Improving Student Engagement by Matching Difficulty Level with Learner Readiness , 2014, 3GSE.

[20]  Darwin P. Hunt,et al.  The concept of knowledge and how to measure it , 2003 .