Individual crowdfunding practices

This study investigates characteristics of individual crowdfunding practices and drivers of fundraising success, where entrepreneurs can tailor their crowdfunding initiatives better than on standardized platforms. Our data indicate that most of the funds provided are entitled to receive either financial compensations (equity and profit-share arrangement) or nonfinancial benefits (final product and token of appreciation), while donations are less common. Moreover, crowdfunding initiatives that are structured as nonprofit organizations tend to be significantly more successful than other organizational forms in achieving their fundraising targets, even after controlling for various project characteristics. This finding is in line with theoretical arguments developed by the contract failure literature which postulates that nonprofit organizations may find it easier to attract money for initiatives that are of interest for the general community due to their reduced focus on profits.

[1]  J. Sohl The U.S. Angel and Venture Capital Market , 2003 .

[2]  Stefan Pitschner,et al.  Non-profit differentials in crowd-based financing: Evidence from 50,000 campaigns , 2014 .

[3]  Al Slivinski,et al.  Rational Nonprofit Entrepreneurship , 1998 .

[4]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[5]  Thomas Hildebrand,et al.  Adverse Incentives in Crowdfunding , 2014 .

[6]  Siva Viswanathan,et al.  Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[7]  5. Angel Finance: The Other Venture Capital , 2012 .

[8]  Peng Liu,et al.  Rational Herding in Microloan Markets , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Chris Ward,et al.  Crowdfunding the next hit : Microfunding online experience goods , 2010 .

[10]  S. Viswanathan,et al.  Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep : Social Networks and Adverse Selection in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending , 2009 .

[11]  Andrew Wong,et al.  Angel Finance: The Other Venture Capital , 2002 .

[12]  M. Puri,et al.  Skin in the Game: Incentives in Crowdfunding , 2011 .

[13]  H. Hansmann,et al.  The Ownership of Enterprise , 1996 .

[14]  O. Hart,et al.  Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation , 1988 .

[15]  Armin Schwienbacher,et al.  Crowdfunding of Small Entrepreneurial Ventures , 2010 .

[16]  Darian M. Ibrahim The (Not So) Puzzling Behavior of Angel Investors , 2007 .

[17]  Maitreesh Ghatak,et al.  Thanks for Nothing? Not-for-Profits and Motivated Agents , 2009 .

[18]  Ethan Mollick,et al.  The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: Determinants of Success and Failure , 2013 .

[19]  J. Sohl,et al.  Angles on angels: Financing technology-based ventures - a historical perspective , 2002 .

[20]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.