Highly undersampled supraaortic MRA at 3.0 T: initial results with parallel imaging in two directions using a 16-channel neurovascular coil and parallel imaging factors up to 16.

PURPOSE To present the feasibility of highly undersampled contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) of the supraaortic arteries with a 16-channel neurovascular coil at 3.0 T using parallel imaging in two directions with parallel imaging factors (PIF) up to 16. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. In a prospective study, MRA protocols including PIF of 1, 2, 4, 9 and 16 yielding a spatial resolution from 0.81×0.81×1.0 mm(3) to 0.46×.46×0.98 mm(3) were acquired. In 32 examinations, image quality and vascular segments were rated independently by two radiologists. SNR estimations were performed for all MRA protocols. RESULTS The use of high PIF allowed to shorten acquisition time from 2:09 min down to 1:13 min and to increase the anatomic coverage while maintaining or even increasing spatial resolution down to 0.46×0.46×0.98 mm(3). The larger anatomic coverage that was achieved with the use of high PIF allowed for visualization of vascular structures that were not covered by the standard protocols. Despite the resulting lower SNR using high PIF, image quality was constantly rated to be adequate for diagnosis or better in all cases. CONCLUSION The use of high PIF yielded diagnostic image quality and allowed to increase the anatomic coverage while maintaining or even improving spatial resolution and shortening the acquisition time.

[1]  Achim Seeger,et al.  Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla , 2008, European Radiology.

[2]  X Leclerc,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: the effect of voxel size on image quality. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  P. Nederkoorn,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. , 2003, Radiology.

[4]  J Huston,et al.  Carotid artery tandem lesions: frequency of angiographic detection and consequences for endarterectomy. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[5]  Allan J. Fox,et al.  Significance of Plaque Ulceration in Symptomatic Patients With High‐Grade Carotid Stenosis , 1994, Stroke.

[6]  Jan Menke,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in severe carotid stenosis: meta-analysis with metaregression of different techniques , 2009, European Radiology.

[7]  S J Riederer,et al.  Carotid artery: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with conventional angiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[8]  H. Urbach,et al.  Noninvasive Detection of Steno-Occlusive Disease of the Supra-Aortic Arteries With Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: A Prospective, Intra-Individual Comparative Analysis With Digital Subtraction Angiography , 2005, Stroke.

[9]  X. Golay,et al.  Three-dimensional isotropic contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid artery using sensitivity-encoding and random elliptic centric k-space filling: technique optimization , 2005, Neuroradiology.

[10]  Raja Muthupillai,et al.  Parallel Imaging in MR Angiography , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[11]  J Paul Finn,et al.  High Spatial-Resolution CE-MRA of the Carotid Circulation With Parallel Imaging: Comparison of Image Quality Between 2 Different Acceleration Factors at 3.0 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[12]  Franz A Fellner,et al.  High-Resolution, Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Elliptical Centric k-Space Ordering of Supra-aortic Arteries Compared With Selective X-Ray Angiography , 2002, Stroke.

[13]  Horst Urbach,et al.  Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. , 2002, Radiology.

[14]  S J Riederer,et al.  Feathering: Vertebral artery pseudostenosis with elliptical centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  A. Baird,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Internal Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2008, Stroke.

[16]  A. Fox,et al.  How to measure carotid stenosis. , 1993, Radiology.

[17]  Whitney B Pope,et al.  Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view. , 2007, Radiology.

[18]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Image reconstruction in SNR units: A general method for SNR measurement † , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  J. Debbins,et al.  Arterial phase carotid and vertebral artery imaging in 3D contrast‐enhanced MR angiography by combining fluoroscopic triggering with an elliptical centric acquisition order , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Horst Urbach,et al.  4D time‐resolved MR angiography with keyhole (4D‐TRAK): More than 60 times accelerated MRA using a combination of CENTRA, keyhole, and SENSE at 3.0T , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  M. Bernstein,et al.  High‐resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: Technical considerations and initial experience , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Highly accelerated cardiovascular MR imaging using many channel technology: concepts and clinical applications , 2007, European Radiology.