Identification of Genes That Promote or Antagonize Somatic Homolog Pairing Using a High-Throughput FISH–Based Screen

The pairing of homologous chromosomes is a fundamental feature of the meiotic cell. In addition, a number of species exhibit homolog pairing in nonmeiotic, somatic cells as well, with evidence for its impact on both gene regulation and double-strand break (DSB) repair. An extreme example of somatic pairing can be observed in Drosophila melanogaster, where homologous chromosomes remain aligned throughout most of development. However, our understanding of the mechanism of somatic homolog pairing remains unclear, as only a few genes have been implicated in this process. In this study, we introduce a novel high-throughput fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technology that enabled us to conduct a genome-wide RNAi screen for factors involved in the robust somatic pairing observed in Drosophila. We identified both candidate “pairing promoting genes” and candidate “anti-pairing genes,” providing evidence that pairing is a dynamic process that can be both enhanced and antagonized. Many of the genes found to be important for promoting pairing are highly enriched for functions associated with mitotic cell division, suggesting a genetic framework for a long-standing link between chromosome dynamics during mitosis and nuclear organization during interphase. In contrast, several of the candidate anti-pairing genes have known interphase functions associated with S-phase progression, DNA replication, and chromatin compaction, including several components of the condensin II complex. In combination with a variety of secondary assays, these results provide insights into the mechanism and dynamics of somatic pairing.

[1]  A. Dernburg In situ hybridization to somatic chromosomes in Drosophila. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[2]  J. Tsai,et al.  Homologous pairing and the role of pairing centers in meiosis , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[3]  P. Shaw,et al.  Organization and dynamics of plant interphase chromosomes. , 2011, Trends in plant science.

[4]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  Live-Cell Chromosome Dynamics and Outcome of X Chromosome Pairing Events during ES Cell Differentiation , 2011, Cell.

[5]  D. Dorsett Cohesin: genomic insights into controlling gene transcription and development. , 2011, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[6]  J. Diffley,et al.  Positive Supercoiling of Mitotic DNA Drives Decatenation by Topoisomerase II in Eukaryotes , 2011, Science.

[7]  Aki Minoda,et al.  Double-Strand Breaks in Heterochromatin Move Outside of a Dynamic HP1a Domain to Complete Recombinational Repair , 2011, Cell.

[8]  Stormy J. Chamberlain,et al.  Neuronal chromatin dynamics of imprinting in development and disease , 2011, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[9]  Wouter de Laat,et al.  Genome organization influences partner selection for chromosomal rearrangements. , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[10]  D. Clift,et al.  The Role of Shugoshin in Meiotic Chromosome Segregation , 2011, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[11]  E. Torre,et al.  DNA Topoisomerase II Modulates Insulator Function in Drosophila , 2011, PLoS ONE.

[12]  Benjamin Leblanc,et al.  Polycomb-Dependent Regulatory Contacts between Distant Hox Loci in Drosophila , 2011, Cell.

[13]  M. Merkenschlager Cohesin: a global player in chromosome biology with local ties to gene regulation. , 2010, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[14]  B. Stillman,et al.  Human origin recognition complex is essential for HP1 binding to chromatin and heterochromatin organization , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  P. Arumugam Homolog pairing during meiosis: Dyneins on the move , 2010, Cell cycle.

[16]  A. Wood,et al.  Condensin and cohesin complexity: the expanding repertoire of functions , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[17]  Marco Foiani,et al.  Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[18]  B. Panning,et al.  Condensin complexes regulate mitotic progression and interphase chromatin structure in embryonic stem cells , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  R. Karess,et al.  BubR1- and Polo-Coated DNA Tethers Facilitate Poleward Segregation of Acentric Chromatids , 2010, Cell.

[20]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[21]  Harmit S. Malik,et al.  Multiple roles for heterochromatin protein 1 genes in Drosophila. , 2009, Annual review of genetics.

[22]  William D. Gilliland,et al.  Heterochromatic Threads Connect Oscillating Chromosomes during Prometaphase I in Drosophila Oocytes , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[23]  G. Bosco,et al.  Chromosome Alignment and Transvection Are Antagonized by Condensin II , 2008, Science.

[24]  A. Inoue,et al.  Perturbation of HP1 localization and chromatin binding ability causes defects in sister-chromatid cohesion. , 2008, Mutation research.

[25]  C.-ting Wu,et al.  A Genomewide Survey Argues That Every Zygotic Gene Product Is Dispensable for the Initiation of Somatic Homolog Pairing in Drosophila , 2008, Genetics.

[26]  J. Blumenstiel,et al.  Components of the RNAi Machinery That Mediate Long-Distance Chromosomal Associations Are Dispensable for Meiotic and Early Somatic Homolog Pairing in Drosophila melanogaster , 2008, Genetics.

[27]  Karl J. Dykema,et al.  Somatic Pairing of Chromosome 19 in Renal Oncocytoma Is Associated with Deregulated ELGN2-Mediated Oxygen-Sensing Response , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[28]  P. Ingham,et al.  Microcephalin coordinates mitosis in the syncytial Drosophila embryo , 2007, Journal of Cell Science.

[29]  W. Earnshaw,et al.  Chromosomal passengers: conducting cell division , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[30]  T. Cremer,et al.  Maintenance of imprinting and nuclear architecture in cycling cells , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  C.-ting Wu,et al.  Disruption of Topoisomerase II Perturbs Pairing in Drosophila Cell Culture , 2007, Genetics.

[32]  Norbert Perrimon,et al.  Design and implementation of high-throughput RNAi screens in cultured Drosophila cells , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[33]  C. Sunkel,et al.  The Drosophila CLASP homologue, Mast/Orbit regulates the dynamic behaviour of interphase microtubules by promoting the pause state. , 2007, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[34]  E. Joyce,et al.  When specialized sites are important for synapsis and the distribution of crossovers , 2007, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[35]  J. Delcros,et al.  Dynactin targets Pavarotti-KLP to the central spindle during anaphase and facilitates cytokinesis in Drosophila S2 cells , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[36]  A. Chess,et al.  A Deletion at the Mouse Xist Gene Exposes Trans-effects That Alter the Heterochromatin of the Inactive X Chromosome and the Replication Time and DNA Stability of Both X Chromosomes , 2006, Genetics.

[37]  Pengyu Hong,et al.  Evidence of off-target effects associated with long dsRNAs in Drosophila melanogaster cell-based assays , 2006, Nature Methods.

[38]  J. Birchler,et al.  Polycomb, pairing and PIWI--RNA silencing and nuclear interactions. , 2006, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[39]  Donna J. Arndt-Jovin,et al.  Drosophila under the lens: imaging from chromosomes to whole embryos , 2006, Chromosome Research.

[40]  D. Zickler,et al.  From early homologue recognition to synaptonemal complex formation , 2006, Chromosoma.

[41]  Roland Eils,et al.  Transient colocalization of X-inactivation centres accompanies the initiation of X inactivation , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[42]  Chia-Lun Tsai,et al.  Transient Homologous Chromosome Pairing Marks the Onset of X Inactivation , 2006, Science.

[43]  Jussi Taipale,et al.  Identification of pathways regulating cell size and cell-cycle progression by RNAi , 2006, Nature.

[44]  B. McKee The license to pair: Identification of meiotic pairing sites inDrosophila , 1996, Chromosoma.

[45]  Ronald D Vale,et al.  Cell cycle-dependent dynamics and regulation of mitotic kinesins in Drosophila S2 cells. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[46]  E. Suzuki,et al.  The slender lobes gene, identified by retarded mushroom body development, is required for proper nucleolar organization in Drosophila. , 2005, Developmental biology.

[47]  J. LaSalle,et al.  Homologous pairing of 15q11-13 imprinted domains in brain is developmentally regulated but deficient in Rett and autism samples. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[48]  C. W. Metz Chromosome Studies on the Diptera , 1918, Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre.

[49]  R. Vale,et al.  Cell Cycle-dependent Dynamics and Regulation of Mitotic Kinesins in Drosophila S 2 Cells □ , 2005 .

[50]  Norbert Perrimon,et al.  High-throughput RNA interference screens in Drosophila tissue culture cells. , 2005, Methods in enzymology.

[51]  B. Stillman,et al.  Human Orc2 localizes to centrosomes, centromeres and heterochromatin during chromosome inheritance , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[52]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  Distinct functions of condensin I and II in mitotic chromosome assembly , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[53]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  Terminal Cytokinesis Events Uncovered after an RNAi Screen , 2004, Current Biology.

[54]  G. Almouzni,et al.  Mouse centric and pericentric satellite repeats form distinct functional heterochromatin , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[55]  R. Grant-Downton,et al.  Plants, pairing and phenotypes--two's company? , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[56]  B. McKee Homologous pairing and chromosome dynamics in meiosis and mitosis. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[57]  W. Gelbart,et al.  Homeosis and the interaction of zeste and white in Drosophila , 1989, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[58]  Y. Rong,et al.  The homologous chromosome is an effective template for the repair of mitotic DNA double-strand breaks in Drosophila. , 2003, Genetics.

[59]  K. Choo,et al.  Analysis of mammalian proteins involved in chromatin modification reveals new metaphase centromeric proteins and distinct chromosomal distribution patterns. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[60]  A. F. Neuwald,et al.  Differential Contributions of Condensin I and Condensin II to Mitotic Chromosome Architecture in Vertebrate Cells , 2003, Cell.

[61]  G. Goshima,et al.  The roles of microtubule-based motor proteins in mitosis , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[62]  R. Vale,et al.  Molecular requirements for actin-based lamella formation in Drosophila S2 cells , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[63]  J. Barbero,et al.  Depletion of Drad21/Scc1 in Drosophila Cells Leads to Instability of the Cohesin Complex and Disruption of Mitotic Progression , 2003, Current Biology.

[64]  E. Cundari,et al.  Molecular dissection of cytokinesis by RNA interference in Drosophila cultured cells. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[65]  J. Kennison,et al.  Transvection in Drosophila. , 2002, Advances in genetics.

[66]  Ian W Duncan,et al.  Transvection effects in Drosophila. , 2002, Annual review of genetics.

[67]  J. Kassis Pairing-sensitive silencing, polycomb group response elements, and transposon homing in Drosophila. , 2002, Advances in genetics.

[68]  P. Wappner,et al.  Occurrence of a putative SCF ubiquitin ligase complex in Drosophila. , 2001, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[69]  M. Botchan,et al.  Orc mutants arrest in metaphase with abnormally condensed chromosomes. , 2001, Development.

[70]  B. Edgar,et al.  Endoreplication Cell Cycles More for Less , 2001, Cell.

[71]  K. Nasmyth THE GENOME : Joining , Resolving , and Separating Sister Chromatids During Mitosis and Meiosis , 2006 .

[72]  M. Mann,et al.  Mitotic regulation of the APC activator proteins CDC20 and CDH1. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[73]  T. Orr-Weaver,et al.  The mitotic centromeric protein MEI-S332 and its role in sister-chromatid cohesion , 1999, Chromosoma.

[74]  Y. Marahrens X-inactivation by chromosomal pairing events. , 1999, Genes & development.

[75]  L. Riesselmann,et al.  Preferential S-phase pairing of the imprinted region on distal mouse chromosome 7 , 1999, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[76]  T. Hays,et al.  Cytoplasmic Dynein Is Required for the Nuclear Attachment and Migration of Centrosomes during Mitosis in Drosophila , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[77]  V. Pirrotta Transvection and chromosomal trans-interaction effects. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[78]  K. Nairz,et al.  A Central Role for Cohesins in Sister Chromatid Cohesion, Formation of Axial Elements, and Recombination during Yeast Meiosis , 1999, Cell.

[79]  J. R. Morris,et al.  Transvection and other homology effects. , 1999, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[80]  R. Deshaies SCF and Cullin/Ring H2-based ubiquitin ligases. , 1999, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[81]  V. Pirrotta Polycomb silencing and the maintenance of stable chromatin states. , 1999, Results and problems in cell differentiation.

[82]  P. Verveer,et al.  Homologous association of the Bithorax-Complex during embryogenesis: consequences for transvection in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1998, Development.

[83]  Jan-Michael Peters,et al.  Activation of the human anaphase-promoting complex by proteins of the CDC20/Fizzy family , 1998, Current Biology.

[84]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Large-scale Chromosomal Movements During Interphase Progression in Drosophila , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[85]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Trans-Sensing Effects: The Ups and Downs of Being Together , 1998, Cell.

[86]  Abby Dernburg,et al.  Homologous Chromosome Pairing in Drosophila melanogaster Proceeds through Multiple Independent Initiations , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[87]  J. Sedat,et al.  Mapping three-dimensional chromosome architecture in situ. , 1998, Methods in Cell Biology.

[88]  C. Allis,et al.  Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation , 1997, Chromosoma.

[89]  S. Prinz,et al.  CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. , 1997, Science.

[90]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Topological constraints on transvection between white genes within the transposing element TE35B in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1997, Genetics.

[91]  S. Henikoff Nuclear organization and gene expression: homologous pairing and long-range interactions. , 1997, Current opinion in cell biology.

[92]  A. Philpott,et al.  Molecular and cellular characterization of CRP1, a Drosophila chromatin decondensation protein. , 1997, Journal of structural biology.

[93]  D. Kirkland,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridisation with chromosome-specific centromeric probes: a sensitive method to detect aneuploidy. , 1996, Mutation research.

[94]  J. LaSalle,et al.  Homologous Association of Oppositely Imprinted Chromosomal Domains , 1996, Science.

[95]  K. Golic,et al.  A quantitative measure of the mitotic pairing of alleles in Drosophila melanogaster and the influence of structural heterozygosity. , 1996, Genetics.

[96]  D. Agard,et al.  Specific interactions of chromatin with the nuclear envelope: positional determination within the nucleus in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1996, Molecular biology of the cell.

[97]  B. Alberts,et al.  Heterochromatin protein 1 is required for correct chromosome segregation in Drosophila embryos. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[98]  C. Wu Transvection, nuclear structure, and chromatin proteins , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[99]  C Cremer,et al.  Role of chromosome territories in the functional compartmentalization of the cell nucleus. , 1993, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[100]  G. Karpen,et al.  Drosophila ribosomal RNA genes function as an X-Y pairing site during male meiosis , 1990, Cell.

[101]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The Drosophila zeste gene and transvection. , 1989, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[102]  T. W. Ridler,et al.  Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. , 1978 .

[103]  G. Echalier,et al.  [Isolation, in tissue culture, of Drosophila melangaster cell lines]. , 1969, Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des seances de l'Academie des sciences. Serie D: Sciences naturelles.

[104]  E. Lewis The Theory and Application of a New Method of Detecting Chromosomal Rearrangements in Drosophila melanogaster , 1954, The American Naturalist.

[105]  C. W. Metz Chromosome studies on the Diptera. II. The paired association of chromosomes in the Diptera, and its significance , 1916 .

[106]  N. M. Stevens A study of the germ cells of certain diptera, with reference to the heterochromosomes and the phenomena of synapsis , 1908 .