Understanding the drivers of sensitive behavior using Poisson regression from quantitative randomized response technique data

Understanding sensitive behaviors—those that are socially unacceptable or non-compliant with rules or regulations—is essential for creating effective interventions. Sensitive behaviors are challenging to study, because participants are unlikely to disclose sensitive behaviors for fear of retribution or due to social undesirability. Methods for studying sensitive behavior include randomized response techniques, which provide anonymity to interviewees who answer sensitive questions. A variation on this approach, the quantitative randomized response technique (QRRT), allows researchers to estimate the frequency or quantity of sensitive behaviors. However, to date no studies have used QRRT to identify potential drivers of non-compliant behavior because regression methodology has not been developed for the nonnegative count data produced by QRRT. We develop a Poisson regression methodology for QRRT data, based on maximum likelihood estimation computed via the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. The methodology can be implemented with relatively minor modification of existing software for generalized linear models. We derive the Fisher information matrix in this setting and use it to obtain the asymptotic variance-covariance matrix of the regression parameter estimates. Simulation results demonstrate the quality of the asymptotic approximations. The method is illustrated with a case study examining potential drivers of non-compliance with hunting regulations in Sierra Leone. The new methodology allows assessment of the importance of potential drivers of different quantities of non-compliant behavior, using a likelihood-based, information-theoretic approach. Free, open-source software is provided to support QRRT regression.

[1]  Julia P. G. Jones,et al.  The Importance of Taboos and Social Norms to Conservation in Madagascar , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[2]  Celeste Lacuna-Richman The socioeconomic significance of subsistence non-wood forest products in Leyte, Philippines , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[3]  P. T. Liu,et al.  A new discrete quantitative randomized response model , 1976, SIML.

[4]  E. J. Milner-Gulland,et al.  A bioeconomic analysis of bushmeat hunting , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  C. Barrett,et al.  Economic and geographic drivers of wildlife consumption in rural Africa , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Meredith L. Gore,et al.  Detecting and understanding non-compliance with conservation rules , 2015 .

[7]  P. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  The analysis of randomized response sum score variables , 2007 .

[8]  Morten Moshagen,et al.  RRreg: An R package for correlation and regression analyses of randomized response data , 2018 .

[9]  M. Gavin,et al.  Quantifying illegal hunting: a novel application of the quantitative randomised response technique. , 2015 .

[10]  Peter G. M. van der Heijden,et al.  The logistic regression model with response variables subject to randomized response , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[11]  A. Lewbel,et al.  Correlates of Bushmeat Hunting among Remote Rural Households in Gabon, Central Africa , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[12]  Bethan J. Morgan,et al.  Quantifying the scale and socioeconomic drivers of bird hunting in Central African forest communities , 2018 .

[13]  U. N. Umesh,et al.  Randomized Response: A Method for Sensitive Surveys , 1986 .

[14]  M. Gavin,et al.  Local Perceptions of Changes in Traditional Ecological Knowledge: A Case Study from Malekula Island, Vanuatu , 2014, AMBIO.

[15]  G. Anderson,et al.  Socioeconomic predictors of forest use values in the Peruvian Amazon: A potential tool for biodiversity conservation , 2007 .

[16]  T. Milfont,et al.  Estimating non-compliance among recreational fishers: Insights into factors affecting the usefulness of the randomized response and item count techniques , 2015 .

[17]  T. Enters,et al.  Forest products and household economy: a case study from Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, Southern India , 2000, Environmental Conservation.

[18]  T. Tyler Why People Obey the Law , 2021 .

[19]  S. Bamberg,et al.  Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour , 2007 .

[20]  Carlos A. Chávez,et al.  Legitimacy, local participation, and compliance in the Galápagos Marine Reserve , 2004 .

[21]  M. Gavin,et al.  Assessing the impacts of war on perceived conservation capacity and threats to biodiversity , 2017, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[22]  A. Balmford,et al.  Bushmeat Hunting, Wildlife Declines, and Fish Supply in West Africa , 2004, Science.

[23]  D. Wilkie,et al.  Bushmeat hunting in the Congo Basin: an assessment of impacts and options for mitigation , 1999, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[24]  R. Quinlan,et al.  Modernization and medicinal plant knowledge in a Caribbean horticultural village. , 2007, Medical anthropology quarterly.

[25]  Peter G. M. van der Heijden,et al.  Accounting for self-protective responses in randomized response data from a social security survey using the zero-inflated Poisson model , 2008, 0803.3891.

[26]  M. Gavin,et al.  Influence of war on hunting patterns and pressure in Sierra Leone , 2016, Environmental Conservation.

[27]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[28]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[29]  Peter G. M. van der Heijden,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research , 2005 .

[30]  Jennifer N Solomon,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring Illegal Use of Natural Resources , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[31]  D. McKenzie‐Mohr,et al.  Promoting Sustainable Behavior : An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing , 2000 .

[32]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Descriptive Social Norms as Underappreciated Sources of Social Control , 2007 .

[33]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[34]  Morten Moshagen,et al.  Correlation and Regression Analyses for Randomized Response Data , 2016 .

[35]  S L Warner,et al.  Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. , 1965, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[36]  J. R. Nielsen,et al.  Important factors influencing rule compliance in fisheries lessons from Denmark , 2003 .

[37]  Julia P. G. Jones,et al.  The sleeping policeman: understanding issues of enforcement and compliance in conservation , 2008 .

[38]  D. Horvitz,et al.  Application of the Randomized Response Technique in Obtaining Quantitative Data , 1971 .

[39]  S. Jacobson,et al.  Estimating Illegal Resource Use at a Ugandan Park with the Randomized Response Technique , 2007 .

[40]  D. Horvitz,et al.  A Multi-Proportions Randomized Response Model , 1967 .

[41]  Paul E. Tracy,et al.  The Validity of Randomized Response for Sensitive Measurements , 1981 .

[42]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[43]  A. Chaudhuri,et al.  Randomized Response: Theory and Techniques , 1987 .

[44]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[45]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  A Critical Evaluation of the Randomized Response Method , 1991 .

[46]  Maria E. Fernandez-Gimenez,et al.  The role of Mongolian nomadic pastoralists' ecological knowledge in rangeland management. , 2000 .

[47]  Julia P. G. Jones,et al.  Conservation and human behaviour: lessons from social psychology. , 2010 .

[48]  Richard W. Yarnell,et al.  Identifying indicators of illegal behaviour: carnivore killing in human-managed landscapes , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  J. Sutinen,et al.  Rational noncompliance and the liquidation of Northeast groundfish resources , 2010 .

[50]  L. Naughton-Treves,et al.  Effects of a policy-induced income shock on forest-dependent households in the Peruvian Amazon , 2014 .

[51]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  The impact of armed conflict on protected-area efficacy in Central Africa , 2007, Biology Letters.

[52]  T. Milfont,et al.  A New Approach to Identifying the Drivers of Regulation Compliance Using Multivariate Behavioural Models , 2016, PloS one.

[53]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Modelling Based on Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[54]  Kevin Real,et al.  Moving Toward a Theory of Normative Influences: How Perceived Benefits and Similarity Moderate the Impact of Descriptive Norms on Behaviors , 2005, Journal of health communication.

[55]  E. Milner‐Gulland,et al.  A Novel Approach to Assessing the Prevalence and Drivers of Illegal Bushmeat Hunting in the Serengeti , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.