Measuring efficiency in DEA in the presence of common inputs

Abstract Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a methodology for evaluating the relative efficiencies of a set of decision-making units (DMUs). It is commonly assumed that the DMUs are independent of one another, in that each has its own quantities of a set of inputs and outputs. In case this assumption of independence of DMUs holds, decreasing the inputs of one DMU will not affect the inputs of others. The current paper moves beyond the conventional framework and examines a problem setting where there is an interdependence among the DMUs. Consider the case where the members of a given subgroup of DMUs have an input in common, such as would be the case if a set of highway maintenance crews in a district are under the jurisdiction of a district supervisor and district-level resources. The efficiency measurement difficulty created by this “shared’ resource phenomenon is that in attempting to move an inefficient crew towards the frontier by reducing that shared resource (hence penalising that crew), the other crews in that same district will be equally penalised. Specifically, decreasing district resources in relation to their impact on a maintenance crew will cause that resource to decrease as well for other members of the same group. The conventional (input-oriented) DEA model that does not cater for such interdependence situations will fail to address this important issue. To capture this interdependence, we develop a new DEA-like methodology. One of the properties of this new methodology is that its production possibility set cannot be defined in the same manner as in the conventional DEA setting. This is due to the fact that when the DMU under evaluation is projected towards the frontier, the input/output structures of the other units in the same group are altered, unlike the conventional situation where the structures of the other DMUs remain fixed. We apply this new methodology to the problem of evaluating a set of departments in a university setting, where the departments are grouped under various faculties.

[1]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[2]  Abel Moreno,et al.  Assessing academic department efficiency at a public university , 2002 .

[3]  Alireza Amirteimoori,et al.  The role of time in multi-component efficiency analysis: An application , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[4]  Paul Rouse,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis with Nonhomogeneous DMUs , 2013, Oper. Res..

[5]  W. Cook,et al.  Sales performance measurement in bank branches , 2001 .

[6]  J BilleraLouis,et al.  Allocation of Shared Costs , 1982 .

[7]  Jie Wu,et al.  Two-stage network processes with shared resources and resources recovered from undesirable outputs , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DUAL ROLE FACTORS IN DEA , 2006 .

[9]  Hao Xu,et al.  Measuring efficiencies of parallel systems with shared inputs/outputs using data envelopment analysis , 2015, Kybernetes.

[10]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Dual-role factors in data envelopment analysis , 2006 .

[11]  Gerald L. Baliles,et al.  Higher Education and the Public Good. , 1994 .

[12]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[14]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Allocation of shared costs among decision making units: a DEA approach , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[16]  S. Bourke,et al.  The rise of ‘professional staff’ and demise of the ‘non-academic’: a study of university staffing nomenclature preferences , 2012 .

[17]  W. Cook,et al.  Multicomponent Efficiency Measurement and Shared Inputs in Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Sales and Service Performance in Bank Branches , 2000 .

[18]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Data envelopment analysis and university selection , 1997 .

[19]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Efficiency measurements in multi‐activity data envelopment analysis with shared inputs , 2013 .

[20]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Time-staged outputs in DEA , 2015 .

[21]  Renato De Leone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Optimization.

[22]  Wei Dong,et al.  Goal congruence analysis in multi-Division Organizations with shared resources based on data envelopment analysis , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Jill Johnes,et al.  Measuring the Research Performance of UK Economics Departments: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis , 1993 .

[24]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Evaluating the performance of academic departments: an analysis of research-related output efficiency , 2012 .

[25]  J. Beasley Determining Teaching and Research Efficiencies , 1995 .

[26]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Comparing university departments , 1990 .

[27]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluation of Educational Program Proposals by Means of DEA , 1983 .

[28]  Cecilio Mar-Molinero,et al.  A variable returns to scale data envelopment analysis model for the joint determination of efficiencies with an example of the UK health service , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: A DEA approach , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Peter Chalos,et al.  An Examination of Budgetary Inefficiency in Education Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[31]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Kristof De Witte,et al.  Efficiency in education: a review of literature and a way forward , 2017, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[33]  E. Chaffee,et al.  Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research , 2020, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research.

[34]  M. Abbott,et al.  The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis , 2003 .

[35]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multiple Variable Proportionality in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2011, Oper. Res..

[36]  David Güemes-Castorena,et al.  Competitiveness Among Higher Education Institutions: A Two-Stage Cobb-Douglas Model for Efficiency Measurement of Schools of Business , 2014 .

[37]  Hernán Cáceres Venegas,et al.  Análisis de la eficiencia técnica y su relación con los resultados de la evaluación de desempeño en una Universidad Chilena , 2014 .

[38]  Shiv Prasad Yadav,et al.  Relative performance of academic departments using DEA with sensitivity analysis. , 2009, Evaluation and program planning.

[39]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Partial Input to Output Impacts in DEA: Production Considerations and Resource Sharing among Business Subunits , 2013 .

[40]  Jianfeng Ma,et al.  A two-stage DEA model considering shared inputs and free intermediate measures , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[41]  C. Kao,et al.  Efficiency analysis of university departments: An empirical study , 2008 .

[42]  Adrian Sîrbu,et al.  Use of Data Envelopment Analysis to Measure the Performance Efficiency of Academic Departments , 2016 .

[43]  Nur Azlina Abd Aziz,et al.  Comparative Departmental Efficiency Analysis within a University: A DEA Approach , 2013 .

[44]  Salah R. Agha,et al.  Assessment of academic departments efficiency using data envelopment analysis , 2011 .