Early pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) discontinuation among pregnant and postpartum women: Implications for maternal PrEP roll out in South Africa

Introduction: Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a safe and effective prevention strategy to reduce risk of HIV in pregnancy and postpartum. Effective PrEP requires daily PrEP adherence, but little is known about maternal PrEP continuation and risk factors that influence optimal PrEP use. Methods: The PrEP in pregnancy and postpartum (PrEP-PP) study is an ongoing cohort study that enrolled consenting pregnant, HIV-uninfected women at first antenatal care (ANC) visit, followed through 12-months postpartum. HIV-uninfected women and girls >16-years who were eligible for the study received HIV prevention counseling and were offered PrEP. Interviewers collected socio-demographic, behavioral data from participants at each visit. We analyzed the proportion of women who initiated PrEP and the proportion who continued on PrEP after 3-months with associated correlates, including side effects whilst on PrEP, by estimating the prevalence ratio (95% CI) adjusting for a priori confounders. Results: Between August 2019 and February 2021, we enrolled 891 pregnant women (median gestation=21wks; age=26yrs). Following PrEP counseling, 90% of women initiated PrEP at their first ANC visit (n=801); 60% were married or cohabiting. Three-quarters of women on PrEP returned for a repeat prescription at 1-month; 62% returned at 3-months. One-third of women on PrEP reported a side effect, mostly nausea/vomiting, dizziness, and headache. Women on PrEP in the 1st or 2nd trimester had higher odds of reporting side effects (aOR=2.61; 95%CI=1.17-5.84) vs. postpartum women. Women who reported side effects continued with PrEP less than those who did not report side effects (aPR=0.88; 95% CI=0.78-0.99) adjusting for covariates. Women who had >1 previous pregnancy (aPR=0.76;95%CI=0.59-1.00) or were postpartum (aPR=0.86;95%CI=0.75-0.99) continued less than women who were primigravid or pregnant. Women who reported having an HIV+ partner (aPR= 1.70;95% CI=1.55-1.86) or unknown partner serostatus (aPR=1.14;95%CI=1.01-1.29) were more likely to continue on PrEP than those who had HIV-negative partners. Conclusion: PrEP initiation and early continuation were high in ANC in this setting. Being postpartum and experiencing side effects were associated with lower PrEP continuation, presenting an opportunity for improved clinical management and counseling during pregnancy of nausea/vomiting to address early, transient side effects. Interventions for postpartum women on PrEP are urgently needed.

[1]  B. Chi,et al.  Tenofovir Diphosphate Concentrations in Dried Blood Spots From Pregnant and Postpartum Adolescent and Young Women Receiving Daily Observed Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2020, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[2]  L. Myer,et al.  'I had made the decision, and no one was going to stop me': Facilitators of PrEP adherence during pregnancy and postpartum in Cape Town, South Africa , 2020, medRxiv.

[3]  B. Chi,et al.  Defining gaps in pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery for pregnant and post-partum women in high-burden settings using an implementation science framework. , 2020, The lancet. HIV.

[4]  S. Mullick,et al.  Factors influencing uptake, continuation, and discontinuation of oral PrEP among clients at sex worker and MSM facilities in South Africa , 2020, PloS one.

[5]  S. Lees,et al.  Disclosure of PrEP use by young women in South Africa and Tanzania: qualitative findings from a demonstration project , 2020, Culture, health & sexuality.

[6]  S. Delany-Moretlwe,et al.  The influence of HIV‐related stigma on PrEP disclosure and adherence among adolescent girls and young women in HPTN 082: a qualitative study , 2020, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[7]  B. Chi,et al.  Emerging evidence from a systematic review of safety of pre‐exposure prophylaxis for pregnant and postpartum women: where are we now and where are we heading? , 2020, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[8]  J. Baeten,et al.  Pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake and early continuation among pregnant and post-partum women within maternal and child health clinics in Kenya: results from an implementation programme. , 2019, The lancet. HIV.

[9]  J. Baeten,et al.  Integrating preexposure prophylaxis delivery in routine family planning clinics: A feasibility programmatic evaluation in Kenya , 2019, PLoS medicine.

[10]  N. Mugo,et al.  Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention in Women: Current Status and Future Directions , 2019, Drugs.

[11]  J. Baeten,et al.  HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis for adolescent girls and young women in Africa: from efficacy trials to delivery , 2019, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[12]  P. Weatherburn,et al.  Understanding user perspectives of and preferences for oral PrEP for HIV prevention in the context of intervention scale‐up: a synthesis of evidence from sub‐Saharan Africa , 2019, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[13]  L. Myer,et al.  Modelling the potential impact of providing preexposure prophylaxis in pregnant and breastfeeding women in South Africa. , 2019, AIDS.

[14]  Anjuli D Wagner,et al.  Acceptability and outcomes of distributing HIV self-tests for male partner testing in Kenyan maternal and child health and family planning clinics. , 2019, AIDS.

[15]  Lindsay N. Carpp,et al.  Weighing the Evidence of Efficacy of Oral PrEP for HIV Prevention in Women in Southern Africa. , 2018, AIDS research and human retroviruses.

[16]  J. Baeten,et al.  Increased Risk of HIV Acquisition Among Women Throughout Pregnancy and During the Postpartum Period: A Prospective Per-Coital-Act Analysis Among Women With HIV-Infected Partners , 2018, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[17]  J. Baeten,et al.  Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-negative persons with partners living with HIV: uptake, use, and effectiveness in an open-label demonstration project in East Africa , 2017, Gates open research.

[18]  H. Rees,et al.  HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and early antiretroviral treatment among female sex workers in South Africa: Results from a prospective observational demonstration project , 2017, PLoS medicine.

[19]  L. Myer,et al.  Delivering preexposure prophylaxis to pregnant and breastfeeding women in Sub-Saharan Africa: the implementation science frontier. , 2017, AIDS.

[20]  V. Patel,et al.  Pre-exposure prophylaxis prescribing and retention in care among heterosexual women at a community-based comprehensive sexual health clinic , 2017, AIDS care.

[21]  Jennifer A. Unger,et al.  A Risk Assessment Tool for Identifying Pregnant and Postpartum Women Who May Benefit From Preexposure Prophylaxis , 2016, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[22]  J. Baeten,et al.  Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-negative persons with partners living with HIV: uptake, use, and effectiveness in an open-label demonstration project in East Africa. , 2017, Gates open research.

[23]  L. Mofenson Tenofovir Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women at Risk of HIV Infection: The Time is Now , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[24]  J. Baeten,et al.  Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use by Breastfeeding HIV-Uninfected Women: A Prospective Short-Term Study of Antiretroviral Excretion in Breast Milk and Infant Absorption , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[25]  L. van Damme,et al.  Participants' Explanations for Nonadherence in the FEM-PrEP Clinical Trial , 2016, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[26]  J. Baeten,et al.  Tenofovir-based oral preexposure prophylaxis prevents HIV infection among women , 2016, Current opinion in HIV and AIDS.

[27]  T. Ndung’u,et al.  Implementation of couples’ voluntary HIV counseling and testing services in Durban, South Africa , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[28]  Alison L. Drake,et al.  Incident HIV during Pregnancy and Postpartum and Risk of Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[29]  S. Ellington,et al.  Safety of tenofovir during pregnancy for the mother and fetus: a systematic review. , 2013, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[30]  M. Newell,et al.  The Contribution of Maternal HIV Seroconversion During Late Pregnancy and Breastfeeding to Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV , 2012, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.