“Clustering Index method”: A new technique for differentiation between neurogenic and myopathic changes using surface EMG

OBJECTIVE To establish a non-invasive and quantitative analysis method using single-channel surface EMG (SEMG) for diagnosing neurogenic and myopathic changes. METHODS The subjects consisted of 66 healthy controls, 12 patients with neurogenic diseases, and 18 patients with myopathic diseases. The tibialis anterior muscle was examined using a belly to the adjacent bone lead. From each subject, 20-40 signals of 1 s length were collected of various strengths. A new parameter, the "Clustering Index (CI)", was developed to quantify the uneven distribution of the SEMG signal, and was plotted against the SEMG area. The results were expressed as the Z-score of each subject calculated using linear regression from the normative data. RESULTS When ±2.5 was used as the cut-off value of the Z-score, the specificity was 95%, whereas the sensitivity was 92% (11/12) and 61% (11/18) for the neurogenic and myopathic patients, respectively. There was no overlap of the Z-score values between the neurogenic and myopathic groups. CONCLUSIONS The CI method achieved a reasonably high diagnostic yield in detecting neurogenic or myopathic changes. SIGNIFICANCE This is a new simple and quantitative analysis method using SEMG with good reproducibility, and is promising as a non-invasive complement to needle EMG.

[1]  T. Milner,et al.  The effects of skinfold thickness on the selectivity of surface EMG. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  E. Stålberg Invited review: Electrodiagnostic assessment and monitoring of motor unit changes in disease , 1991, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  Masahiro Sonoo,et al.  New attempts to quantify concentric needle electromyography , 2002, Muscle & nerve. Supplement.

[4]  A W Preece,et al.  Quantitative surface EMG in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. , 2002, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Multichannel surface EMG: Basic aspects and clinical utility , 2003, Muscle & nerve.

[6]  A. Rodriquez,et al.  Correlation of motor units with strength and spectral characteristics in polio survivors and controls , 1991, Muscle & nerve.

[7]  Gea Drost,et al.  Clinical applications of high-density surface EMG: a systematic review. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[8]  Sanjeev D. Nandedkar,et al.  Motor unit number index (MUNIX) , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Analysis of amplitude and area of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  E. Stålberg Use of single fiber EMG and macro EMG in study of reinnervation , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[11]  W. Brown Functional compensation of human motor units in health and disease. , 1973, Journal of the neurological sciences.

[12]  A. Wilbourn The electrodiagnostic examination with myopathies. , 1993, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[13]  M Yamada,et al.  The Clinical Use of Multichannel Surface Electromyography , 1991, Acta paediatrica Japonica : Overseas edition.

[14]  E Stålberg,et al.  Automatic analysis of the EMG interference pattern. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  E Stålberg,et al.  Macro EMG, a new recording technique. , 1980, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  A J Gitter,et al.  AAEM practice topics: Technology assessment: The use of surface EMG in the diagnosis and treatment of nerve and muscle disorders , 1996, Muscle & nerve.

[17]  Y. So,et al.  American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine evidenced‐based review: Use of surface electromyography in the diagnosis and study of neuromuscular disorders , 2008, Muscle & nerve.

[18]  A. McComas,et al.  Functional compensation in partially denervated muscles , 1971, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  Jiri Silny,et al.  Diagnostic yield of noninvasive high spatial resolution electromyography in neuromuscular diseases , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[20]  A. McComas,et al.  Motor unit estimation: Anxieties and achievements , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[21]  Jasper R. Daube,et al.  Motor unit number estimates—From A to Z , 2006, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[22]  D. Goodin,et al.  Ovid: Pullman: Neurology, Volume 55(2).July 25, 2000.171-177 , 2006 .

[23]  B Conrad,et al.  Is there an age-dependent continuous increase in the duration of the motor unit action potential? , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  E Stålberg,et al.  A personal computer based system used in electromyography for interpretation and reporting. , 1991, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[25]  D. Farina,et al.  Analysis of motor units with high-density surface electromyography. , 2008, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[26]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Recording characteristics of the surface EMG electrodes , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[27]  A. Akobeng,et al.  Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves , 2007, Acta paediatrica.