Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE To determine, in women with primary operable breast cancer, if preoperative doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan; AC) therapy yields a better outcome than postoperative AC therapy, if a relationship exists between outcome and tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy, and if such therapy results in the performance of more lumpectomies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women (1,523) enrolled onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-18 were randomly assigned to preoperative or postoperative AC therapy. Clinical tumor response to preoperative therapy was graded as complete (cCR), partial (cPR), or no response (cNR). Tumors with a cCR were further categorized as either pathologic complete response (pCR) or invasive cells (pINV). Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and survival were estimated through 5 years and compared between treatment groups. In the preoperative arm, proportional-hazards models were used to investigate the relationship between outcome and tumor response. RESULTS There was no significant difference in DFS, DDFS, or survival (P = .99, .70, and .83, respectively) among patients in either group. More patients treated preoperatively than postoperatively underwent lumpectomy and radiation therapy (67.8% v 59.8%, respectively). Rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after lumpectomy were similar in both groups (7.9% and 5.8%, respectively; P = .23). Outcome was better in women whose tumors showed a pCR than in those with a pINV, cPR, or cNR (relapse-free survival [RFS] rates, 85.7%, 76.9%, 68.1%, and 63.9%, respectively; P < .0001), even when baseline prognostic variables were controlled. When prognostic models were compared for each treatment group, the preoperative model, which included breast tumor response as a variable, discriminated outcome among patients to about the same degree as the postoperative model. CONCLUSION Preoperative chemotherapy is as effective as postoperative chemotherapy, permits more lumpectomies, is appropriate for the treatment of certain patients with stages I and II disease, and can be used to study breast cancer biology. Tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy correlates with outcome and could be a surrogate for evaluating the effect of chemotherapy on micrometastases; however, knowledge of such a response provided little prognostic information beyond that which resulted from postoperative therapy.

[1]  H. Skipper,et al.  Kinetics of mammary tumor cell growth and implications for therapy , 1971, Cancer.

[2]  Goldie Jh,et al.  A mathematic model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. , 1979 .

[3]  N Gunduz,et al.  Effect of surgical removal on the growth and kinetics of residual tumor. , 1979, Cancer research.

[4]  G. Lesnick,et al.  Chemotherapy before and after mastectomy in stage III breast cancer. , 1982, Archives of surgery.

[5]  N Gunduz,et al.  Influence of the interval between primary tumor removal and chemotherapy on kinetics and growth of metastases. , 1983, Cancer research.

[6]  J. Butler,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy followed by mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer , 1983, Journal of surgical oncology.

[7]  C. Redmond,et al.  A randomized clinical trial evaluating tamoxifen in the treatment of patients with node-negative breast cancer who have estrogen-receptor-positive tumors. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  N Gunduz,et al.  Presence of a growth-stimulating factor in serum following primary tumor removal in mice. , 1989, Cancer research.

[9]  B. Fisher,et al.  Effect of local or systemic treatment prior to primary tumor removal on the production and response to a serum growth-stimulating factor in mice. , 1989, Cancer research.

[10]  L. Mauriac,et al.  Effects of primary chemotherapy in conservative treatment of breast cancer patients with operable tumors larger than 3 cm. Results of a randomized trial in a single centre. , 1991, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  B. Asselain,et al.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with tumours considered too large for breast conserving surgery: preliminary results of a randomised trial: S6. , 1994, European journal of cancer.

[12]  T. Powles,et al.  Randomized trial of chemoendocrine therapy started before or after surgery for treatment of primary breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  E. Mamounas,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy: a model for studying the biology and therapy of primary breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  B. Asselain,et al.  Breast tumour response to primary chemotherapy predicts local and distant control as well as survival. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[15]  D. Wickerham,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  B Fisher,et al.  Tamoxifen and chemotherapy for lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.