Computer-aided design of customized foot orthoses: reproducibility and effect of method used to obtain foot shape.

OBJECTIVE To determine, for a number of techniques used to obtain foot shape based around plaster casting, foam box impressions, and 3-dimensional scanning, (1) the effect the technique has on the overall reproducibility of custom foot orthoses (FOs) in terms of inter- and intracaster reliability and (2) the reproducibility of FO design by using computer-aided design (CAD) software in terms of inter- and intra-CAD operator reliability for all these techniques. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS Convenience sample of individuals (N=22) with noncavus foot types. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Parameters of the FO design (length, width at forefoot, width at rearfoot, and peak medial arch height), the forefoot to rearfoot angle of the foot shape, and overall volume match between device designs. RESULTS For intra- and intercaster reliability of the different methods of obtaining the foot shape, all methods fell below the reproducibility quality threshold for the medial arch height of the device, and volume matching was <80% for all methods. The more experienced CAD operator was able to achieve excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.75) for all variables with the exception of forefoot to rearfoot angle, with overall volume matches of >87% of the devices. CONCLUSIONS None of the techniques for obtaining foot shape met all the criteria for excellent reproducibility, with the peak arch height being particularly variable. Additional variability is added at the CAD stage of the FO design process, although with adequate operator experience good to excellent reproducibility may be achieved at this stage. Taking only basic linear or angular measurement parameters from the device may fail to fully capture the variability in FO design.

[1]  K. Rome,et al.  Reliability of capturing foot parameters using digital scanning and the neutral suspension casting technique , 2011, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[2]  Kenneth W. Dalgarno,et al.  Mass Customization of Foot Orthoses for Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Selective Laser Sintering , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  R.R. Neptune,et al.  An Experimental and Theoretical Framework for Manufacturing Prosthetic Sockets for Transtibial Amputees , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  D. Condie,et al.  The modern era of orthotics , 2008, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[5]  Steven J Stanhope,et al.  Dimensional accuracy of ankle-foot orthoses constructed by rapid customization and manufacturing framework. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  James Woodburn,et al.  The use of 3D surface scanning for the measurement and assessment of the human foot , 2010, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[7]  Mario C Faustini,et al.  Advanced Trans-Tibial Socket Fabrication Using Selective Laser Sintering , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  H. Menz,et al.  Alternative techniques for the clinical assessment of foot pronation. , 1998, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[9]  Michelle M. Lusardi,et al.  Orthotics and prosthetics in rehabilitation , 2013 .

[10]  I. McClay Davis,et al.  A comparison of four methods of obtaining a negative impression of the foot. , 2002, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[11]  Craig Payne,et al.  Variability of neutral-position casting of the foot. , 2003, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[12]  A. Leung,et al.  Comparison of plantar pressure distribution patterns between foot orthoses provided by the CAD-CAM and foam impression methods , 2008, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[13]  Perceptions of the ankle brachial index amongst podiatrists registered in Western Australia , 2012, Journal of Foot and Ankle Research.

[14]  Dip Pod,et al.  Cost benefit comparison of plaster casts and optical scans of the foot for the manufacture of foot orthoses , 2007 .

[15]  Pieter Leffers,et al.  Casting methods and plantar pressure: effects of custom-made foot orthoses on dynamic plantar pressure distribution. , 2006, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[16]  S. Telfer,et al.  A novel device for improving marker placement accuracy. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[17]  D G Smith,et al.  The use of CAD/CAM technology in prosthetics and orthotics--current clinical models and a view to the future. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  J. Crosbie,et al.  Effective orthotic therapy for the painful cavus foot: a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.