Acute effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by GSM mobile phones on subjective well-being and physiological reactions: a meta-analysis.

The potential effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) emitted by GSM mobile phones on subjective symptoms, well-being and physiological parameters have been investigated in many studies. However, the results have been ambiguous. The current meta-analysis aims to clarify whether RF-EMF have an influence on well-being in self-reported sensitive persons, as well as in non-sensitive people. A literature search revealed 17 studies including 1174 participants. The single effects for various subjective and objective outcomes were meta-analytically combined to yield a single population parameter. Dependant variables were subjective (e.g. headaches) and objective parameters (e.g. heart rate variability) of well-being. The results show no significant impact of short-term RF-EMF exposure on any parameter. Future research should focus on the possible effects of long-term exposure.

[1]  Henry C. Lai.  Evidence for Effects on Neurology and Behavior , 2007 .

[2]  F. Esen,et al.  EFFECT OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS EMITTED BY CELLULAR PHONES ON THE LATENCY OF EVOKED ELECTRODERMAL ACTIVITY , 2006, The International journal of neuroscience.

[3]  G. Oftedal,et al.  Nocebo as headache trigger: evidence from a sham‐controlled provocation study with RF fields , 2008, Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[4]  Maila Hietanen,et al.  Hypersensitivity symptoms associated with exposure to cellular telephones: No causal link , 2002, Bioelectromagnetics.

[5]  The cardiac effects of a mobile phone positioned closest to the heart. , 2009, Anadolu kardiyoloji dergisi : AKD = the Anatolian journal of cardiology.

[6]  Harri Lindholm,et al.  Cellular phone use does not acutely affect blood pressure or heart rate of humans , 2004, Bioelectromagnetics.

[7]  G. Bárdos,et al.  Polluted places or polluted minds? An experimental sham-exposure study on background psychological factors of symptom formation in 'Idiophatic Environmental Intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields'. , 2010, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[8]  Paul K. Joseph,et al.  Effect of mobile phone radiation on heart rate variability , 2008, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[9]  G. Curcio,et al.  Is the brain influenced by a phone call? An EEG study of resting wakefulness , 2005, Neuroscience Research.

[10]  Toshio Nojima,et al.  Effects of thirty minutes mobile phone use on the human sensory cortex , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Con Stough,et al.  The effect of electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones on human sleep , 2005, Neuroreport.

[12]  Physiological effects of RF exposure on hypersensitive people by a cell phone , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  Witold Pilecki,et al.  The influence of the call with a mobile phone on heart rate variability parameters in healthy volunteers. , 2008, Industrial health.

[14]  D. Bamiou,et al.  Mobile telephone use effects on peripheral audiovestibular function: A case–control study , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[15]  M. Borenstein.  Effect sizes for continuous data. , 2009 .

[16]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Sleep after mobile phone exposure in subjects with mobile phone‐related symptoms , 2011, Bioelectromagnetics.

[17]  M Koivisto,et al.  GSM phone signal does not produce subjective symptoms , 2001, Bioelectromagnetics.

[18]  Simon Wessely,et al.  Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly ‘electromagnetic hypersensitivity’): An updated systematic review of provocation studies , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[19]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  Exposure to Mobile Phone Electromagnetic Fields and Subjective Symptoms: A Double-Blind Study , 2008, Psychosomatic medicine.

[20]  Ingram Olkin,et al.  Stochastically dependent effect sizes. , 1994 .

[21]  L. Hedges.  Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect size and Related Estimators , 1981 .

[22]  L. Stovner,et al.  Mobile Phone Headache: A Double Blind, Sham-Controlled Provocation Study , 2007, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[23]  Jo Spong,et al.  Neuropsychological sequelae of digital mobile phone exposure in humans , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Niels Kuster,et al.  The effects of 884 MHz GSM wireless communication signals on headache and other symptoms: An experimental provocation study , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[25]  C. Heumann,et al.  The impact of exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields on chronic well-being in young people--a cross-sectional study based on personal dosimetry. , 2011, Environment international.

[26]  E. Lyskov,et al.  Psychophysiological tests and provocation of subjects with mobile phone related symptoms , 2006, Bioelectromagnetics.

[27]  M. Koivisto,et al.  Perception of the electromagnetic field emitted by a mobile phone , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[28]  László Hejjel,et al.  The application of surface plethysmography for heart rate variability analysis after GSM radiofrequency exposure. , 2006, Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods.

[29]  M. Röösli.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a systematic review. , 2008, Environmental research.

[30]  B. Everitt,et al.  Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  Gabriella Tognola,et al.  Electromagnetic fields produced by GSM cellular phones and heart rate variability , 2007, Bioelectromagnetics.

[32]  Ki Chang Nam,et al.  Hypersensitivity to RF fields emitted from CDMA cellular phones: a provocation study. , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[33]  Heikki Hämäläinen,et al.  Effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields: Critical evaluation of behavioral and neurophysiological studies , 2011, Bioelectromagnetics.