An efficient solution for resolving iTRAQ and TMT channel cross-talk.

Isobaric tagging reagents such as isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) and tandem mass tag (TMT) typically have isotopic impurities that cause significant cross-talk between channels. Here, we present an efficient solution to compensate for channel cross-talk using linear algebra and find that it is between 20× and 120× faster than previous methods. We also find that the effects of channel cross-talk are as important to manage as the effects of ratio compression because of precursor impurities, and we have released an open-source tool to perform both types of calculations.

[1]  M. Wühr,et al.  Accurate, Sensitive, and Precise Multiplexed Proteomics using the Complement Reporter Ion Cluster , 2017, bioRxiv.

[2]  M. Mann,et al.  EASI-tag enables accurate multiplexed and interference-free MS2-based proteome quantification , 2017, bioRxiv.

[3]  Xia Yang,et al.  Extended Multiplexing of Tandem Mass Tags (TMT) Labeling Reveals Age and High Fat Diet Specific Proteome Changes in Mouse Epididymal Adipose Tissue* , 2017, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[4]  Jaqueline A. Picache,et al.  An Efficient Approach to Evaluate Reporter Ion Behavior from MALDI-MS/MS Data for Quantification Studies Using Isobaric Tags. , 2015, Journal of Proteome Research.

[5]  Eystein Oveland,et al.  PeptideShaker enables reanalysis of MS-derived proteomics data sets , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  Lingjun Li,et al.  High-Resolution Enabled 12-Plex DiLeu Isobaric Tags for Quantitative Proteomics , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  Pavel A. Pevzner,et al.  Universal database search tool for proteomics , 2014, Nature Communications.

[8]  J. Yates,et al.  Isobaric Labeling-Based Relative Quantification in Shotgun Proteomics , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[9]  Edward L. Huttlin,et al.  MultiNotch MS3 Enables Accurate, Sensitive, and Multiplexed Detection of Differential Expression across Cancer Cell Line Proteomes , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  B. Kuster,et al.  Measuring and managing ratio compression for accurate iTRAQ/TMT quantification. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[11]  L. Peshkin,et al.  Accurate multiplexed proteomics at the MS2 level using the complement reporter ion cluster. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[12]  Natalie I. Tasman,et al.  A Cross-platform Toolkit for Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  Martin Eisenacher,et al.  The mzIdentML Data Standard for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Results , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[14]  D R Mani,et al.  iTRAQ Labeling is Superior to mTRAQ for Quantitative Global Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[15]  Manor Askenazi,et al.  Delayed fragmentation and optimized isolation width settings for improvement of protein identification and accuracy of isobaric mass tag quantification on Orbitrap-type mass spectrometers. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  S. Gygi,et al.  MS3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric labeling-based multiplexed quantitative proteomics , 2011, Nature Methods.

[17]  M. Westphall,et al.  Gas-phase purification enables accurate, large-scale, multiplexed proteome quantification with isobaric tagging , 2011, Nature Methods.

[18]  Josselin Noirel,et al.  Minimising iTRAQ ratio compression through understanding LC‐MS elution dependence and high‐resolution HILIC fractionation , 2011, Proteomics.

[19]  Derek J. Bailey,et al.  COMPASS: A suite of pre‐ and post‐search proteomics software tools for OMSSA , 2011, Proteomics.

[20]  B. Searle.  Scaffold: A bioinformatic tool for validating MS/MS‐based proteomic studies , 2010, Proteomics.

[21]  Michael D. Litton,et al.  IDPicker 2.0: Improved protein assembly with high discrimination peptide identification filtering. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[22]  Surendra Dasari,et al.  Quantification of isotopically overlapping deamidated and 18o-labeled peptides using isotopic envelope mixture modeling. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[23]  D. Hochstrasser,et al.  Relative quantification of proteins in human cerebrospinal fluids by MS/MS using 6-plex isobaric tags. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[24]  Terry M Therneau,et al.  Statistical analysis of relative labeled mass spectrometry data from complex samples using ANOVA. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[25]  Jens M. Rick,et al.  Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[26]  H. R. Bergen,et al.  A Method for Automatically Interpreting Mass Spectra of 18O-Labeled Isotopic Clusters*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[27]  R. Aebersold,et al.  ProbIDtree: An automated software program capable of identifying multiple peptides from a single collision‐induced dissociation spectrum collected by a tandem mass spectrometer , 2005, Proteomics.

[28]  C. Bessant,et al.  i-Tracker: For quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ™ , 2005, BMC Genomics.

[29]  K. Parker,et al.  Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Amine-reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[30]  Shu-Hui Chen,et al.  Stable-isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[31]  Andrew H. Thompson,et al.  Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Quantitative Proteome Analysis by Solid-phase Isotope Tagging and Mass Spectrometry Beads Photocleavable Linker Isotope Tag Reactive Group , 2022 .

[33]  M. Mann,et al.  Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, SILAC, as a Simple and Accurate Approach to Expression Proteomics* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[34]  X. Yao,et al.  Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[35]  S. Gygi,et al.  Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  Terry D. Lee,et al.  Data-controlled automation of liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry analysis of peptide mixtures , 1996, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[37]  David L Tabb,et al.  What's driving false discovery rates? , 2008, Journal of proteome research.