“My Husband Usually Makes Those Decisions”: Gender, Behavior, and Attitudes Toward the Marine Environment

Human behavior impacts the environment we live in. In order to better understand how one group, boat owners, in three Nordic countries adjacent to the Baltic Sea; Sweden, Finland and Denmark, viewed the relationship between the marine environment, leisure boats and issues of responsibility, a survey study was conducted (n = 1701). The results show that there are differences between gender in many areas and those women in general are more environmentally friendly than men in their views and behavior. Men and women seek information about boating by different channels and this knowledge may be used in future information campaigns. Both men and women ranked boat owners as having the lowest impact on the marine environment and perceived these to be responsible for addressing environmental issues caused by leisure boat activities. The results also show that it is important to prove the effectiveness of an environmentally safe product since this factor is ranked higher than price when considering buying a product. The results suggest that once environmentally friendly behavior is established, such as recycling, this behavior continues. One implication of this study is that small changes in human behavior are seen as acceptable but larger commitments are more difficult to achieve. If individuals do not feel responsible for causing environmental damage, this aspect needs to be addressed in information aimed at this group. Novel approaches on framing the information and new ways of disseminating information are needed.

[1]  M. M. Ferree Beyond Separate Spheres: Feminism and Family Research. , 1990 .

[2]  X. Diao,et al.  Growth Options and Poverty Reduction in Ethiopia: An Economy-Wide Model Analysis , 2007 .

[3]  J. Stranlund Public Mechanisms to Support Compliance to an Environmental Norm , 1995 .

[4]  P. Gustafson Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Putting their money where their mouths are: Consumer willingness to pay for multi-ingredient, processed organic food products , 2006 .

[6]  Daphne Goldman,et al.  Environmental Literacy in Teacher Training: Attitudes, Knowledge, and Environmental Behavior of Beginning Students , 2007 .

[7]  H. Lenihan,et al.  Depletion, Degradation, and Recovery Potential of Estuaries and Coastal Seas , 2006, Science.

[8]  S. Cottrell Influence of Sociodemographics and Environmental Attitudes on General Responsible Environmental Behavior among Recreational Boaters , 2003 .

[9]  Britta Eklund,et al.  Tributyltin Originates from Pleasure Boats in Sweden in Spite of Firm Restrictions , 2008 .

[10]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Gender, race, and perceived risk: The 'white male' effect , 2000 .

[11]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Environmental Problems and Human Behavior , 1995 .

[12]  L. Warg,et al.  Gender and regional differences in risk perception: results from implementing the Seveso II Directive in Sweden , 2002 .

[13]  B. K. Eriksson,et al.  Boating and Navigation Activities Influence the Recruitment of Fish in a Baltic Sea Archipelago Area , 2005, Ambio.

[14]  Martin Isaeus,et al.  Effects of boating activities on aquatic vegetation in the Stockholm archipelago, Baltic Sea. , 2004 .

[15]  John B. Unipan,et al.  Green Buying: The Influence of Environmental Concern on Consumer Behavior , 1997 .

[16]  C. Vlek,et al.  Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : An integrative review and research agenda , 2009 .

[17]  Mary E. Schoen,et al.  Preferences for Change: Do Individuals Prefer Voluntary Actions, Soft Regulations, or Hard Regulations to Decrease Fossil Fuel Consumption? , 2009 .

[18]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence , 2005 .

[19]  medolbec Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change , 2010 .

[20]  J. Leonard,et al.  Resources and estuarine health: perceptions of elected officials and recreational fishers. , 1999, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[21]  Lynnette Zelezny,et al.  Educational Interventions That Improve Environmental Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis , 1999 .

[22]  P. Stern,et al.  Social Structural and Social Psychological Bases of Environmental Concern , 1998 .

[23]  Benno Torgler,et al.  Differences in Preferences Towards the Environment: The Impact of a Gender, Age and Parental Effect , 2008 .

[24]  P. Stern,et al.  The Value Basis of Environmental Concern , 1994 .

[25]  S. Barr,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Understanding and Analysing Attitudes towards Household-Waste Management , 2001 .

[26]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  Honestly, why are you driving a BMW? , 2006 .

[27]  R. J. Bord,et al.  Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change , 1999 .

[28]  G. Schernewski,et al.  Baltic Coastal Ecosystems , 2002 .

[29]  K. Henderson,et al.  Gender‐based analysis of leisure constraints , 1995 .

[30]  H. Wennhage,et al.  Recent increase of filamentous algae in shallow Swedish bays: Effects on the community structure of epibenthic fauna and fish , 1995, Netherland Journal of Aquatic Ecology.

[31]  P. Stern New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[32]  P. Wesley Schultz,et al.  Values and their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behavior , 2005 .