Order allocation of logistics service supply chain with fairness concern and demand updating: model analysis and empirical examination

Regarding a two-echelon supply chain consisting of a logistics service integrator (LSI) and several functional logistics service providers (FLSPs), this paper establishes a two-stage order allocation model considering demand updating and the FLSPs’ fairness preferences. This model is a multi-objective programming model, whose goal is to maximize profits of the LSI and the total utility of FLSPs. The ideal point method is used to obtain the optimal solution. In the numerical example, the impacts of FLSPs’ behavioral parameters and demand update parameters on the order allocation in the social services network are discussed. Besides, multi-methodological method is used to verify the theoretical perspectives through an empirical study of Tianjin SND Logistics Company. Our study obtains a few important conclusions. For example, when demand of the second stage is updated, there is an optimal updating time maximizing the supply chain performance. Increased demand of the second stage results in greater supply chain performance. When the demand during the second stage decreases, the bigger the difference of the fairness preference coefficients among FLSPs, the greater the LSI’s profits and the lower the FLSPs’ total utility will be. However, the difference of the fairness preference coefficients among FLSPs has little influence on the LSI’s profits and total utility of the FLSPs, when the demand during the second stage increases.

[1]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory , 1996 .

[2]  Karen Tate The elements of a successful logistics partnership , 1996 .

[3]  Chunling Liu,et al.  An order allocation model in multi-period logistics service supply chain based on cumulative prospect theory and capacity matching constraint , 2014 .

[4]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  A Supply Chain with a Service Requirement for Each Market Signal , 2009 .

[5]  Meimei Zheng,et al.  On optimal emergency orders with updated demand forecast and limited supply , 2015 .

[6]  Seyed Hassan Ghodsypour,et al.  A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming , 1998 .

[7]  Colin Camerer Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[8]  Chen Xu,et al.  Ordering, pricing and allocation in a service supply chain , 2013 .

[9]  Ezgi Aktar Demirtaş,et al.  An integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation , 2008 .

[10]  Elena Katok,et al.  Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study , 2013 .

[11]  T. Valente Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations , 1996 .

[12]  Z. H. Che,et al.  Supplier selection and supply quantity allocation of common and non-common parts with multiple criteria under multiple products , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[13]  P. Pontrandolfo,et al.  Negotiation of the revenue sharing contract: An agent-based systems approach , 2009 .

[14]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[15]  Rong-Ho Lin,et al.  An integrated model for supplier selection under a fuzzy situation , 2012 .

[16]  Yuming Mo,et al.  Order Allocation Research of Logistics Service Supply Chain with Mass Customization Logistics Service , 2013 .

[17]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  Distributional and Peer-Induced Fairness in Supply Chain Contract Design , 2013, Production and Operations Management.

[18]  Ananth V. Iyer,et al.  Backup agreements in fashion buying—the value of upstream flexibility , 1997 .

[19]  W. C. Benton Quantity discount decisions under conditions of multiple items, multiple suppliers and resource limitations , 1991 .

[20]  Martha Saboyá,et al.  The cohesiveness of subgroups in social networks: A view from game theory , 2008, Ann. Oper. Res..

[21]  M. Breton,et al.  Supplier selection-order allocation: A two stage multiple criteria dynamic programming approach , 2011 .

[22]  John H. Miller,et al.  NOTES AND COMMENTS GIVING ACCORDING TO GARP: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE CONSISTENCY OF PREFERENCES FOR ALTRUISM , 2002 .

[23]  Ananth V. Iyer,et al.  Improved Fashion Buying with Bayesian Updates , 1997, Oper. Res..

[24]  Bin Shen,et al.  Service supply chain management: A review of operational models , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  K. Donohue Efficient Supply Contracts for Fashion Goods with Forecast Updating and Two Production Modes , 2000 .

[26]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Quantity Flexibility Contracts: Optimal Decisions with Information Updates , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[27]  Yijia Wang,et al.  Quality Control Game Model in Logistics Service Supply Chain Based on Different Combinations of Risk Attitude , 2015 .

[28]  Lei Zhao,et al.  A supplier selection and order allocation problem with stochastic demands , 2011, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[29]  Zhi-Ping Fan,et al.  Channel Coordination in Logistics Service Supply Chain considering Fairness , 2016 .

[30]  A. Tsay The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives , 1999 .

[31]  Ananth V. Iyer,et al.  Quick Response in Manufacturer-Retailer Channels , 1997 .

[32]  M. Rabin Published by: American , 2022 .

[33]  Armin Falk,et al.  A Theory of Reciprocity , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[34]  Tsan-Ming Choi,et al.  Optimal single ordering policy with multiple delivery modes and Bayesian information updates , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[35]  Tony Haitao Cui,et al.  Fairness and Channel Coordination , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  Reducing the Cost of Demand Uncertainty Through Accurate Response to Early Sales , 1996, Oper. Res..

[37]  Suman Mallik,et al.  Coordinating supply chains with competition: Capacity allocation in semiconductor manufacturing , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  Qian Wang,et al.  A Multi-period Order Allocation Model of two-echelon Logistics Service Supply Chain Based on Inequity Aversion Theory , 2015 .

[39]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Network analysis of 2-mode data , 1997 .

[40]  Shachar Kariv,et al.  Individual Preferences for Giving , 2005 .

[41]  J. Miltenburg,et al.  Order quantities for style goods with two order opportunities and Bayesian updating of demand. Part I: no capacity constraints , 2007 .

[42]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[43]  Xiang Li,et al.  The two-stage batch ordering strategy of logistics service capacity with demand update , 2015 .

[44]  Liu Wei-hua,et al.  An emergency order allocation model based on multi‐provider in two‐echelon logistics service supply chain , 2011 .

[45]  M. Rabin,et al.  Understanding Social Preference with Simple Tests , 2001 .

[46]  Xuanming Su,et al.  Peer-Induced Fairness in Games , 2008 .

[47]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation , 1999 .

[48]  Jian Chen,et al.  Postponed product differentiation with demand information update , 2013 .

[49]  Jian Chen,et al.  A coordination mechanism for a supply chain with demand information updating , 2006 .

[50]  S. H. Ghodsypour,et al.  The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint , 2001 .

[51]  Erik R. Larsen,et al.  Complex behaviour in a production-distribution model , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[52]  Meir J. Rosenblatt,et al.  Flexible supply contracts for short life‐cycle goods: The buyer's perspective , 2002 .

[53]  Alain Bensoussan,et al.  Optimal decision making in multi-product dual sourcing procurement with demand forecast updating , 2014, Comput. Oper. Res..

[54]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Error correction mechanisms in social networks can reduce accuracy and encourage innovation , 2014, Soc. Networks.

[55]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[56]  Pier Vittorio Mannucci,et al.  Social Networks, Creativity, and Entrepreneurship , 2015 .

[57]  Tsan-Ming Choi,et al.  Multi‐Methodological Research in Operations Management , 2016 .

[58]  Yevgeniy Vorobeychik,et al.  Behavioral Conflict and Fairness in Social Networks , 2011, WINE.

[59]  M. Christopher Logistics & Supply Chain Management , 1998 .

[60]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Innovative Quick Response Programs: A Review , 2010 .

[61]  Validating an Ultra-Short Survey Measure of Patience , 2013 .

[62]  Yeu-Shiang Huang,et al.  A study on coordination of capacity allocation for different types of contractual retailers , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[63]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Optimal Ordering Decisions with Uncertain Cost and Demand Forecast Updating , 1999 .

[64]  Yan Zhang,et al.  An allocation game model with reciprocal behavior and its applications in supply chain pricing decisions , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[65]  J. Bradford,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to the Two-period Style-goods Inventory Problem with Single Replenishment and Heterogeneous Poisson Demands , 1990 .

[66]  Yves Dallery,et al.  Optimising reorder intervals and order-up-to levels in guaranteed service supply chains , 2014 .

[67]  Janny Leung,et al.  Inventory lot-sizing with supplier selection , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[68]  A. Rizzi,et al.  A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services , 2006 .

[69]  Paul R. Messinger,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics The role of fairness in competitive supply chain relationships : An experimental study , 2016 .