Guiding Explanation Construction by Children at the Entry Points of Learning Progressions.

Policy documents in science education suggest that even at the earliest years of formal schooling, students are capable of constructing scientific explanations about focal content. Nonetheless, few research studies provide insights into how to effectively provide scaffolds appropriate for late ele- mentary-age students' fruitful creation of scientific explanations. This article describes two research studies to address the question, what makes explanation construction difficult for elementary students? The studies were conducted in urban fourth, fifth, and sixth grade classrooms where students were learning science through curricular units that contained 8 weeks of scaffold-rich activities focused on explanation construction. The first study focused on the kind and amount of information scaffold-rich assessments provided about young students' abilities to construct explanations under a range of scaffold conditions. Results demonstrated that fifth and sixth grade tests provided strong information about a range of students' abilities to construct explanations under a range of supported conditions. On balance, the fourth grade test did not provide as much information, nor was this test curricular-sensitive. The second study provided information on pre-post test achievement relative to the amount of curricular intervention utilized over the 8-week time period with each cohort. Results demonstrated that when taking the amount of the intervention into account, there were strong learning gains in all three grade- level cohorts. In conjunction with the pre-post study, a type-of-error analysis was conducted to better understand the nature of errors among younger students. This analysis revealed that our youngest stu- dents generated the most incomplete responses and struggled in particular ways with generating valid evidence. Conclusions emphasize the synergistic value of research studies on scaffold-rich assessments, curricular scaffolds, and teacher guidance toward a more complete understanding of how to support young students' explanation construction. 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 49: 141-165, 2012

[1]  Sarah J. Fick,et al.  Characterizing Teachers' Verbal Scaffolds to Guide Elementary Students' Creation of Scientific Explanations. , 2013 .

[2]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[3]  Katherine L. McNeill.  Elementary Students' Views of Explanation, Argumentation, and Evidence, and Their Abilities to Construct Arguments over the School Year. , 2011 .

[4]  Amelia Wenk Gotwals,et al.  Reasoning up and down a Food Chain: Using an Assessment Framework to Investigate Students' Middle Knowledge. , 2009 .

[5]  Ben Kelcey,et al.  How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity , 2009 .

[6]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  Middle school students’ use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations , 2007 .

[7]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .

[8]  M. R. Espejo.  Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences , 2004 .

[9]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Making authentic science accessible to students , 2003 .

[10]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations , 2003 .

[11]  T. Bond.  Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, Second Edition , 2001 .

[12]  J. Slotta,et al.  Organizing principles for science education partnerships: Case studies of students' learning about ‘rats in space’ and ‘deformed frogs’ , 1999 .

[13]  J. Lagowski.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[14]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[15]  E. Muraki.  Information Functions of the Generalized Partial Credit Model , 1993 .

[16]  Kathleen E. Metz.  Development of explanation: Incremental and fundamental change in children's physics knowledge , 1991 .

[17]  Stephen J. Ruberg,et al.  Contrasts for Identifying the Minimum Effective Dose , 1989 .

[18]  G. Masters.  A rasch model for partial credit scoring , 1982 .

[19]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[20]  N. Songer,et al.  Assessing Students’ Progressing Abilities To Construct Scientific Explanations , 2012 .

[21]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  What Kind of Explanation is a Model , 2010 .

[22]  Stephen E. Toulmin,et al.  The Uses of Argument, Updated Edition , 2008 .

[23]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[24]  Andreas Schleicher,et al.  PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World , 2007 .

[25]  Nancy Butler Songer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: BioKIDS , 2005 .

[26]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[27]  Jere Confrey,et al.  On Evaluating Curricular Effectiveness: Judging the Quality of K-12 Mathematics Evaluations. , 2004 .

[28]  John Van Hoewyk,et al.  A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models , 2001 .

[29]  S. Embretson,et al.  Item response theory for psychologists , 2000 .

[30]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .