Self-contained deep learning-based boosting of 4D cone-beam CT reconstruction.

PURPOSE Four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (4D CBCT) imaging has been suggested as a solution to account for interfraction motion variability of moving targets like lung and liver during radiotherapy (RT) of moving targets. However, due to severe sparse view sampling artifacts, current 4D CBCT data lack sufficient image quality for accurate motion quantification. In the present paper, we introduce a deep learning-based framework for boosting the image quality of 4D CBCT image data that can be combined with any CBCT reconstruction approach and clinical 4D CBCT workflow. METHODS Boosting is achieved by learning the relationship between so-called sparse view pseudo-time-average CBCT images obtained by a projection selection scheme introduced to mimic phase image sparse view artifact characteristics and corresponding time-average CBCT images obtained by full view reconstruction. The employed convolutional neural network architecture is the residual dense network (RDN). The underlying hypothesis is that the RDN learns the appearance of the streaking artifacts that is typical for 4D CBCT phase images - and removes them without influencing the anatomical image information. After training the RDN, it can be applied to the 4D CBCT phase images to enhance the image quality without affecting the contained temporal and motion information. Different to existing approaches, no patient-specific prior knowledge about anatomy or motion characteristics is needed, that is, the proposed approach is self-contained. RESULTS Application of the trained network to reconstructed phase images of an external (SPARE challenge) as well as in-house 4D CBCT patient and motion phantom data set reduces the phase image streak artifacts consistently for all patients and state-of-the-art reconstruction approaches. Using the SPARE data set, we show that the root mean squared error compared to ground truth data provided by the challenge is reduced by approximately 50% while normalized cross correlation of reconstruction and ground truth is improved up to 10%. Compared to direct deep learning-based 4D CBCT to 4D CT mapping, our proposed method performs better because inappropriate prior knowledge about the patient anatomy and physiology is taken into account. Moreover, the image quality enhancement leads to more plausible motion fields estimated by deformable image registration (DIR) in the 4D CBCT image sequences. CONCLUSIONS The presented framework enables significantly boosting of 4D CBCT image quality as well as improved DIR and motion field consistency. Thus, the proposed method facilitates extraction of motion information from severely artifact-affected images, which is one of the key challenges of integrating 4D CBCT imaging into RT workflows.

[1]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Respiratory motion models: a review. , 2013 .

[2]  R. Toya,et al.  Image quality of four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography obtained at various gantry rotation speeds for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial markers. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[3]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Evaluation of sparse-view reconstruction from flat-panel-detector cone-beam CT , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Geoffrey Hugo,et al.  Image-guided radiotherapy via daily online cone-beam CT substantially reduces margin requirements for stereotactic lung radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Michael Grass,et al.  Cardiac C-arm computed tomography using a 3D + time ROI reconstruction method with spatial and temporal regularization. , 2014, Medical physics.

[6]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Framing U-Net via Deep Convolutional Framelets: Application to Sparse-View CT , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Directional sinogram interpolation for motion weighted 4D cone-beam CT reconstruction. , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Densely Connected Convolutional Networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[9]  Paul J Keall,et al.  An analysis of thoracic and abdominal tumour motion for stereotactic body radiotherapy patients , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  M. Zelefsky,et al.  Improved clinical outcomes with high-dose image guided radiotherapy compared with non-IGRT for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[12]  J. Petersen,et al.  Inter- and intrafractional localisation errors in cone-beam CT guided stereotactic radiation therapy of tumours in the liver and lung , 2010, Acta oncologica.

[13]  S. Rit,et al.  On-the-fly motion-compensated cone-beam CT using an a priori model of the respiratory motion. , 2009, Medical physics.

[14]  Lei Dong,et al.  Digital reconstruction of high-quality daily 4D cone-beam CT images using prior knowledge of anatomy and respiratory motion , 2015, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[15]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76. , 2006, Medical physics.

[16]  C. Clark,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  Marcus Brehm,et al.  Artifact-resistant motion estimation with a patient-specific artifact model for motion-compensated cone-beam CT. , 2013, Medical physics.

[18]  Josh Star-Lack,et al.  Fast 4D cone-beam reconstruction using the McKinnon-Bates algorithm with truncation correction and nonlinear filtering , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[19]  Yun Fu,et al.  Residual Dense Network for Image Super-Resolution , 2018, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[20]  Tobias Knopp,et al.  Influence of deformable image registration on 4D dose simulation for extracranial SBRT: A multi-registration framework study. , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  Marcus Brehm,et al.  Motion vector field phase-to-amplitude resampling for 4D motion-compensated cone-beam CT. , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Bin Li,et al.  SPARE: SPArse-view REconstruction challenge for 4D cone-beam CT from a one-minute scan. , 2019, Medical physics.

[23]  Marnix G Witte,et al.  Acute toxicity after image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy compared to 3D conformal radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Graeme C. Mc Kinnon,et al.  Towards Imaging the Beating Heart Usefully with a Conventional CT Scanner , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Chun-Chien Shieh,et al.  Learning from our neighbours: a novel approach on sinogram completion using bin-sharing and deep learning to reconstruct high quality 4DCBCT , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[26]  A. Schmidt-Richberg,et al.  Estimation of lung motion fields in 4D CT data by variational non-linear intensity-based registration: A comparison and evaluation study , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Simon Rit,et al.  The Reconstruction Toolkit (RTK), an open-source cone-beam CT reconstruction toolkit based on the Insight Toolkit (ITK) , 2014 .

[28]  Benjamin Movsas,et al.  Evaluation of gantry speed on image quality and imaging dose for 4D cone-beam CT acquisition , 2016, Radiation oncology.

[29]  K Poels,et al.  Real time tracking in liver SBRT: comparison of CyberKnife and Vero by planning structure-based γ-evaluation and dose-area-histograms , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Accuracy and inter-observer variability of 3D versus 4D cone-beam CT based image-guidance in SBRT for lung tumors , 2012, Radiation oncology.

[31]  R Werner,et al.  Correspondence model-based 4D VMAT dose simulation for analysis of local metastasis recurrence after extracranial SBRT. , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.