Performance Evaluation of Edge-Directed Interpolation Methods for Images

Many interpolation methods have been developed for high visual quality, but fail for inability to preserve image structures. Edges carry heavy structural information for detection, determination and classification. Edge-adaptive interpolation approaches become a center of focus. In this paper, performance of four edge-directed interpolation methods comparing with two traditional methods is evaluated on two groups of images. These methods include new edge-directed interpolation (NEDI), edge-guided image interpolation (EGII), iterative curvature-based interpolation (ICBI), directional cubic convolution interpolation (DCCI) and two traditional approaches, bi-linear and bi-cubic. Meanwhile, no parameters are mentioned to measure edge-preserving ability of edge-adaptive interpolation approaches and we proposed two. One evaluates accuracy and the other measures robustness of edge-preservation ability. Performance evaluation is based on six parameters. Objective assessment and visual analysis are illustrated and conclusions are drawn from theoretical backgrounds and practical results.

[1]  Sean Dougherty,et al.  Edge detector evaluation using empirical ROC curves , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).

[2]  Moon Gi Kang,et al.  Super-resolution image reconstruction: a technical overview , 2003, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[3]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Canny edge detection enhancement by scale multiplication , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  D. Darian Muresan,et al.  Fast edge directed polynomial interpolation , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[7]  Ian Robinson Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: a valuable diagnostic tool , 2009 .

[8]  Ibrahim Ethem Pekkucuksen Edge directed resolution enhancement and demosaicing , 2011 .

[9]  J. D. van Ouwerkerk,et al.  Image super-resolution survey , 2006, Image Vis. Comput..

[10]  A. J. Shah,et al.  Image super resolution-A survey , 2012, 2012 1st International Conference on Emerging Technology Trends in Electronics, Communication & Networking.

[11]  Thomas Martin Deserno,et al.  Survey: interpolation methods in medical image processing , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Weiming Dong,et al.  Image zooming using directional cubic convolution interpolation , 2012 .

[13]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Robust edge-directed interpolation of magnetic resonance images , 2011, 2011 4th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI).

[14]  G. Qu,et al.  Information measure for performance of image fusion , 2002 .

[15]  Orit A Glenn,et al.  Fetal MRI: a developing technique for the developing patient. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Nicola Asuni,et al.  Accuracy Improvements and Artifacts Removal in Edge Based Image Interpolation , 2008, VISAPP.

[17]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Why is image quality assessment so difficult? , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[18]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[19]  Mei-Juan Chen,et al.  A fast edge-oriented algorithm for image interpolation , 2005, Image Vis. Comput..