Direct single molecule measurement of TCR triggering by agonist pMHC in living primary T cells

T cells discriminate between self and foreign antigenic peptides, displayed on antigen presenting cell surfaces, via the TCR. While the molecular interactions between TCR and its ligands are well characterized in vitro, quantitative measurements of these interactions in living cells are required to accurately resolve the physical mechanisms of TCR signaling. We report direct single molecule measurements of TCR triggering by agonist pMHC in hybrid junctions between live primary T cells and supported lipid membranes. Every pMHC:TCR complex over the entire cell is tracked while simultaneously monitoring the local membrane recruitment of ZAP70, as a readout of TCR triggering. Mean dwell times for pMHC:TCR molecular binding of 5 and 54 s were measured for two different pMHC:TCR systems. Single molecule measurements of the pMHC:TCR:ZAP70 complex indicate that TCR triggering is stoichiometric with agonist pMHC in a 1:1 ratio. Thus any signal amplification must occur downstream of TCR triggering. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00778.001

[1]  J. Groves,et al.  Patterned Two-Photon Photoactivation Illuminates Spatial Reorganization in Live Cells , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[2]  Rajat Varma,et al.  Actin and agonist MHC–peptide complex–dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  W. B. Caldwell,et al.  Single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy of enzyme conformational dynamics and cleavage mechanism. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  K. Mossman,et al.  T cell receptor microcluster transport through molecular mazes reveals mechanism of translocation. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[5]  J. Allison,et al.  Attenuated T Cell Responses to a High-Potency Ligand In Vivo , 2010, PLoS biology.

[6]  E. Palmer,et al.  Affinity threshold for thymic selection through a T-cell receptor–co-receptor zipper , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[7]  M. Davis,et al.  Kinetics of T-cell receptor binding to peptide/I-Ek complexes: correlation of the dissociation rate with T-cell responsiveness. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Jonathan A. Cooper,et al.  A mechanism for SRC kinase-dependent signaling by noncatalytic receptors. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[9]  J. Groves,et al.  Receptor signaling clusters in the immune synapse. , 2012, Annual review of biophysics.

[10]  J. Groves,et al.  Kinetic control of histidine-tagged protein surface density on supported lipid bilayers. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[11]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.

[12]  Robert Maile,et al.  CD8+ T Cell Activation Is Governed by TCR-Peptide/MHC Affinity, Not Dissociation Rate1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[13]  P. Allen,et al.  A Kinetic Threshold between Negative and Positive Selection Based on the Longevity of the T Cell Receptor–Ligand Complex , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  Cliburn Chan,et al.  Feedback control of T–cell receptor activation , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Making the T cell receptor go the distance: a topological view of T cell activation. , 1997, Immunity.

[16]  D. Grier,et al.  Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies , 1996 .

[17]  Omer Dushek,et al.  Mechanisms for T cell receptor triggering , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[18]  Arup K. Chakraborty,et al.  Fast on-rates allow short dwell time ligands to activate T cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  R. Mariuzza,et al.  Crystal structure of a complete ternary complex of T-cell receptor, peptide–MHC, and CD4 , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Evan W. Newell,et al.  TCR–peptide–MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity , 2010, Nature.

[21]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Bayesian detection of intensity changes in single molecule and molecular dynamics trajectories. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[22]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Determination of interaction kinetics between the T cell receptor and peptide-loaded MHC class II via single-molecule diffusion measurements. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[24]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Insights from in situ analysis of TCR–pMHC recognition: response of an interaction network , 2013, Immunological reviews.

[25]  Cyril F. Reboul,et al.  Epitope Flexibility and Dynamic Footprint Revealed by Molecular Dynamics of a pMHC-TCR Complex , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  Jay T. Groves,et al.  Characterization of dynamic actin associations with T-cell receptor microclusters in primary T cells , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[27]  Bernhard Hemmer,et al.  TCR ligand discrimination is enforced by competing ERK positive and SHP-1 negative feedback pathways , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[28]  S. Bromley,et al.  The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. , 1999, Science.

[29]  Rajat Varma,et al.  T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. , 2006, Immunity.

[30]  Takashi Saito,et al.  Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76 , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[31]  Rajat Varma,et al.  Mechanisms for segregating T cell receptor and adhesion molecules during immunological synapse formation in Jurkat T cells , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide–MHC complexes , 1995, Nature.

[33]  J. Groves,et al.  EphA2 receptor activation by monomeric Ephrin-A1 on supported membranes. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Structural Basis of Specificity and Cross-Reactivity in T Cell Receptors Specific for Cytochrome c–I-Ek , 2011, The Journal of Immunology.

[35]  M. Davis,et al.  Kinetic discrimination in T-cell activation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  J. Groves,et al.  T-cell triggering thresholds are modulated by the number of antigen within individual T-cell receptor clusters , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  S. Jameson,et al.  Selective development of CD4+ T cells in transgenic mice expressing a class II MHC-restricted antigen receptor , 1989, Nature.

[38]  Tetsuo Yamazaki,et al.  T cell receptor ligation induces the formation of dynamically regulated signaling assemblies , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[39]  Nicole C. Fay,et al.  Myosin IIA Modulates T Cell Receptor Transport and CasL Phosphorylation during Early Immunological Synapse Formation , 2012, PloS one.

[40]  J. Groves,et al.  Supported Membrane Formation, Characterization, Functionalization, and Patterning for Application in Biological Science and Technology , 2010, Current protocols in chemical biology.

[41]  Oliver Beckstein,et al.  Lipidbook: A Public Repository for Force-Field Parameters Used in Membrane Simulations , 2010, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[42]  A. Weiss,et al.  Sequential interactions of the TCR with two distinct cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases. , 1994, Science.

[43]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Spatial and temporal dynamics of T cell receptor signaling with a photoactivatable agonist. , 2007, Immunity.

[44]  K. Garcia,et al.  T cell receptor signaling is limited by docking geometry to peptide-major histocompatibility complex. , 2011, Immunity.

[45]  B. Alarcón,et al.  Organization of the resting TCR in nanoscale oligomers , 2013, Immunological reviews.

[46]  Jayajit Das,et al.  Digital Signaling and Hysteresis Characterize Ras Activation in Lymphoid Cells , 2009, Cell.

[47]  Jay T. Groves,et al.  Synaptic pattern formation during cellular recognition , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Xiangxu Kong,et al.  Single-molecule FRET reveals sugar-induced conformational dynamics in LacY , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Cutting Edge: Evidence for a Dynamically Driven T Cell Signaling Mechanism , 2012, The Journal of Immunology.

[50]  N. Burroughs,et al.  Differential segregation in a cell-cell contact interface: the dynamics of the immunological synapse. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[51]  Morgan Huse,et al.  Agonist/endogenous peptide–MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity , 2005, Nature.

[52]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  The kinetics of two dimensional TCR and pMHC interactions determine T cell responsiveness , 2010, Nature.

[53]  Dan R. Littman,et al.  Signal transduction by lymphocyte antigen receptors , 1994, Cell.

[54]  Ronald N Germain,et al.  Modeling T Cell Antigen Discrimination Based on Feedback Control of Digital ERK Responses , 2005, PLoS biology.

[55]  M. Strano,et al.  Current Protocols in Chemical Biology , 2009 .