Ethical Perspectives on Emerging Assistive Technologies: Insights from Focus Groups with Stakeholders in Long-Term Care Facilities

Assistive technologies are relatively novel tools for research and daily care in long-term care (LTC) facilities that are faced with the burgeoning of the older adult population and dwindling staffing resources. The degree to which stakeholders in LTC facilities are receptive to the use of these technologies is poorly understood. Eighteen semi-structured focus groups and one interview were conducted with relevant groups of stakeholders at seven LTC facilities in southwestern Pennsylvania. Common themes identified across all focus groups centered on concerns for privacy, autonomy, cost, and safety associated with implementation of novel technologies. The relative importance of each theme varied by stakeholder group as well as the perceived severity of cognitive and/or physical disability. Our findings suggest that ethical issues are critical to acceptance of novel technologies by their end users, and that stakeholder groups are interdependent and require shared communication about the acceptance of these emerging technologies.

[1]  A. Mihailidis,et al.  Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: State of the art , 2004 .

[2]  A. Sixsmith,et al.  Quality of Life Technologies for People With Dementia , 2007 .

[3]  Lennart Magnusson,et al.  Ethical issues arising from a research, technology and development project to support frail older people and their family carers at home. , 2003, Health & social care in the community.

[4]  Chad A. Phipps,et al.  CareWatch: A Home Monitoring System for Use in Homes of Persons With Cognitive Impairment , 2007, Topics in geriatric rehabilitation.

[5]  J. Yesavage,et al.  Cognitive function and the costs of Alzheimer disease. An exploratory study. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[6]  Stuart S. Blume,et al.  Technology Assessment and the Sociopolitics of Health Technologies , 2000, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[7]  V. Freedman,et al.  Factors Influencing the Use of Mobility Technology in Community-Based Long-Term Care , 2004, Journal of aging and health.

[8]  A R Brown,et al.  Do it yourself: home-made aids for disabled elderly people. , 1997, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[10]  Penny Cheek,et al.  Aging Well With Smart Technology , 2005, Nursing administration quarterly.

[11]  Görel Hansebo Rnt,et al.  Carers’ reflections about their video-recorded interactions with patients suffering from severe dementia , 2008 .

[12]  B. Glaser The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis , 1965 .

[13]  Claudine McCreadie,et al.  Can adapting the homes of older people and providing assistive technology pay its way? , 2004, Age and ageing.

[14]  J. Forlizzi,et al.  Intelligent assistive technology applications to dementia care: current capabilities, limitations, and future challenges. , 2009, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[15]  D. Bennett,et al.  Alzheimer disease in the US population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census. , 2003, Archives of neurology.

[16]  Nick Hine,et al.  Monitoring the Well‐being of Older People , 2007 .

[17]  J. Matthews,et al.  Everyday Health: Technology for Adaptive Aging , 2004 .

[18]  Karel Vredenburg,et al.  User-Centered Design: An Integrated Approach , 2001 .

[19]  Helen Hoenig,et al.  Does assistive technology substitute for personal assistance among the disabled elderly? , 2003, American journal of public health.

[20]  Toni Rietveld,et al.  Statistical Techniques for the Study of Language and Language Behaviour , 1993 .