The transient Dst electromagnetic induction signal at satellite altitudes for a realistic 3‐D electrical conductivity in the crust and mantle

[1] Magnetometer data from recent low-orbit satellite missions Orsted and CHAMP offer an opportunity to improve our knowledge of electrical conductivity of the Earth's mantle. The forward modelling of electromagnetic induction (EM) is conventionally carried out in the frequency domain. We use a time-domain technique to study the electromagnetic response of a realistic 3-D electrical conductivity model based on seismic tomography and laboratory measurements. The model is excited by a Dst signal realistic in time evolution but simplified as spatial dipolar shape. The results show measurable response of simulated satellite time series to mid-mantle conductivity inhomogeneities. The interpretation of satellite magnetic data for the determination of 3-D mantle conductivity inhomogeneities will, however, require a more precise model of external ionospheric and magnetospheric currents. This can be obtained by simultaneous measurements by several satellites.

[1]  A. Schultz,et al.  On the electrical conductivity of the mid‐mantle: II. Delineation of heterogeneity by application of extremal inverse solutions , 1990 .

[2]  J. Poirier,et al.  Electrical conductivity of the Earth's lower mantle , 1993, Nature.

[3]  Zdeněk Martinec,et al.  Spectral–finite element approach to three‐dimensional electromagnetic induction in a spherical earth , 1999 .

[4]  K. Vikram,et al.  Time-domain ultrasonic NDE of layered media: Texas A&M University, Aerospace Engineering Department, College Station, TX 77843, USA , 1992 .

[5]  Yozo Hamano,et al.  A new time-domain approach for the electromagnetic induction problem in a three-dimensional heterogeneous earth , 2002 .

[6]  A. Schultz,et al.  On the electrical conductivity of the mid‐mantle‐I. Calculation of equivalent scalar magnetotelluric response functions , 1987 .

[7]  R. H. Estes,et al.  Large‐scale, near‐field magnetic fields from external sources and the corresponding induced internal field , 1983 .

[8]  Janet U. Kozyra,et al.  Outstanding issues of ring current dynamics , 2002 .

[9]  Mark E. Everett,et al.  Geomagnetic induction in a heterogeneous sphere: fully three-dimensional test computations and the response of a realistic distribution of oceans and continents , 1998 .

[10]  Adam Schultz,et al.  Geoelectromagnetic induction in a heterogeneous sphere:a new three‐dimensional forward solver using a conservative staggered‐grid finite difference method , 2000 .

[11]  Mark E. Everett,et al.  Effects of near-surface conductance on global satellite induction responses , 2003 .

[12]  R. Banks Geomagnetic Variations and the Electrical Conductivity of the Upper Mantle , 1969 .

[13]  M. Everett,et al.  Geomagnetic induction in a heterogenous sphere: Azimuthally symmetric test computations and the response of an undulating 660‐km discontinuity , 1996 .

[14]  Zdeněk Martinec,et al.  Geomagnetic induction in multiple eccentrically nested spheres , 2002 .

[15]  P. Tarits,et al.  Electromagnetic studies of global geodynamic processes , 1994 .

[16]  T. Shankland,et al.  Laboratory‐based electrical conductivity in the Earth's mantle , 2000 .