Motion Tracking for Medical Imaging: A Nonvisible Structured Light Tracking Approach

We present a system for head motion tracking in 3D brain imaging. The system is based on facial surface reconstruction and tracking using a structured light (SL) scanning principle. The system is designed to fit into narrow 3D medical scanner geometries limiting the field of view. It is tested in a clinical setting on the high resolution research tomograph (HRRT), Siemens PET scanner with a head phantom and volunteers. The SL system is compared to a commercial optical tracking system, the Polaris Vicra system, from NDI based on translatory and rotary ground truth motions of the head phantom. The accuracy of the systems was similar, with root mean square (rms) errors of 0.09° for ±20° axial rotations, and rms errors of 0.24 mm for ± 25 mm translations. Tests were made using 1) a light emitting diode (LED) based miniaturized video projector, the Pico projector from Texas Instruments, and 2) a customized version of this projector replacing a visible light LED with a 850 nm near infrared LED. The latter system does not provide additional discomfort by visible light projection into the patient's eyes. The main advantage over existing head motion tracking devices, including the Polaris Vicra system, is that it is not necessary to place markers on the patient. This provides a simpler workflow and eliminates uncertainties related to marker attachment and stability. We show proof of concept of a marker less tracking system especially designed for clinical use with promising results.

[1]  Jason Geng,et al.  Structured-light 3D surface imaging: a tutorial , 2011 .

[2]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Design of a motion-compensation OSEM list-mode algorithm for resolution-recovery reconstruction for the HRRT , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[3]  Michael M. Kazhdan,et al.  Poisson surface reconstruction , 2006, SGP '06.

[4]  Sune H. Keller,et al.  Automatic thresholding for frame-repositioning using external tracking in PET brain imaging , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[5]  G. Frankowski,et al.  DLP-based 3D metrology by structured light or projected fringe technology for life sciences and industrial metrology , 2009, MOEMS-MEMS.

[6]  T. Zeffiro,et al.  Head movement in normal subjects during simulated PET brain imaging with and without head restraint. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Munther A. Gdeisat,et al.  Fast two-dimensional phase-unwrapping algorithm based on sorting by reliability following a noncontinuous path. , 2002, Applied optics.

[8]  B. Lopresti,et al.  Implementation and performance of an optical motion tracking system for high resolution brain PET imaging , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[9]  Fu-Pen Chiang,et al.  Color-encoded digital fringe projection technique for high-speed three-dimensional surface contouring , 1999 .

[10]  B. Welch,et al.  Pose measurement and tracking system for motion-correction of unrestrained small animal PET/SPECT imaging , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[11]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm , 2001, Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling.

[12]  N Raghunath,et al.  Motion correction of PET brain images through deconvolution: II. Practical implementation and algorithm optimization , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Dean F. Wong,et al.  Accurate Event-Driven Motion Compensation in High-Resolution PET Incorporating Scattered and Random Events , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Wei Lu,et al.  Reconstruction of 4D-CT data sets acquired during free breathing for the analysis of respiratory motion , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  C. J. Thompson,et al.  Motion correction of PET images using multiple acquisition frames , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  H. Iida,et al.  Sinogram-based motion correction of PET images using optical motion tracking system and list-mode data acquisition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[17]  Rasmus Larsen,et al.  Anatomically Plausible Surface Alignment and Reconstruction , 2010, TPCG.

[18]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions , 1987 .

[19]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  Rasmus Larsen,et al.  Markov Random Field Surface Reconstruction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[21]  Rasmus Larsen,et al.  Structured light 3D tracking system for measuring motions in PET brain imaging , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[22]  Mikkel B. Stegmann,et al.  Motion-Compensation of Cardiac Perfusion MRI Using a Statistical Texture Ensemble , 2003, FIMH.

[23]  R. Wojcik,et al.  A restraint-free small animal SPECT imaging system with motion tracking , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[24]  M. Sibomana,et al.  Spatial resolution of the HRRT PET scanner using 3D-OSEM PSF reconstruction , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[25]  Rasmus R. Paulsen,et al.  Motion Tracking in Narrow Spaces: A Structured Light Approach , 2010, MICCAI.

[26]  Claus Gramkow,et al.  On Averaging Rotations , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.