Value homophily benefits cooperation but motivates employing incorrect social information.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Hahn. Victims Of Groupthink A Psychological Study Of Foreign Policy Decisions And Fiascoes , 2016 .
[2] Mario Baum,et al. Culture And The Evolutionary Process , 2016 .
[3] M. Sutter,et al. Donations, Risk Attitudes and Time Preferences: A Study on Altruism in Primary School Children , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[4] Joanna J. Bryson,et al. ON THE RELIABILITY OF UNRELIABLE INFORMATION: GOSSIP AS CULTURAL MEMORY , 2014 .
[5] Yoh Iwasa,et al. Barriers to Cooperation Aid Ideological Rigidity and Threaten Societal Collapse , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[6] Yoh Iwasa,et al. The conflict of social norms may cause the collapse of cooperation: indirect reciprocity with opposing attitudes towards in-group favoritism. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.
[7] Alexander J. Stewart,et al. From extortion to generosity, evolution in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[8] Tatsuya Sasaki,et al. Effect of assessment error and private information on stern-judging in indirect reciprocity , 2013, ArXiv.
[9] Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al. Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together? , 2013, Human Nature.
[10] Simon J. Greenhill,et al. Population structure and cultural geography of a folktale in Europe , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[11] Shinsuke Suzuki,et al. Indirect reciprocity is sensitive to costs of information transfer , 2013, Scientific Reports.
[12] M. Tomasello,et al. Direct and indirect reputation formation in nonhuman great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) and human children (Homo sapiens). , 2013, Journal of comparative psychology.
[13] Martin A Nowak,et al. Evolution of extortion in Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma games , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[14] R. Schonmann,et al. Altruism Can Proliferate through Population Viscosity despite High Random Gene Flow , 2012, PloS one.
[15] Hideyuki Suzuki,et al. Indirect reciprocity with trinary reputations , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.
[16] R. Bénabou. Groupthink: Collective Delusions in Organizations and Markets , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[17] Martin A. Nowak,et al. The Evolution of Homophily , 2012, Scientific Reports.
[18] Mitsuhiro Nakamura,et al. Groupwise information sharing promotes ingroup favoritism in indirect reciprocity , 2012, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[19] Naoki Masuda,et al. Ingroup favoritism and intergroup cooperation under indirect reciprocity based on group reputation , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.
[20] Giuseppe Labianca,et al. Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work?: A social network perspective on workplace gossip , 2012, Soc. Networks.
[21] Rosaria Conte,et al. Gossip for social control in natural and artificial societies , 2012, Simul..
[22] M. Tomasello,et al. Direct and Indirect Reputation Formation in Nonhuman Great Apes and Human Children , 2012 .
[23] R. Trivers. Deceit and Self-Deception , 2011 .
[24] Alex Mesoudi,et al. An experimental comparison of human social learning strategies: payoff-biased social learning is adaptive but underused , 2011 .
[25] Mitsuhiro Nakamura,et al. Indirect Reciprocity under Incomplete Observation , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[26] Karthik Panchanathan,et al. Two wrongs don't make a right: the initial viability of different assessment rules in the evolution of indirect reciprocity. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.
[27] D. Helbing,et al. How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[28] Vincent A. Traag,et al. Indirect reciprocity through gossiping can lead to cooperative clusters , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life (ALIFE).
[29] Richard A. Watson,et al. THE CONCURRENT EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION AND THE POPULATION STRUCTURES THAT SUPPORT IT , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[30] R. Trivers,et al. The evolution and psychology of self-deception. , 2011, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[31] J. A. Marshall. Ultimate causes and the evolution of altruism , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[32] Gordon P. D. Ingram,et al. Children's Tattling: the reporting of everyday norm violations in preschool settings. , 2010, Child development.
[33] A. Magurran,et al. Information Transfer across Fish Shoals under Predator Threat , 2010 .
[34] T. Lillicrap,et al. Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament , 2010, Science.
[35] Karl Sigmund,et al. The competition of assessment rules for indirect reciprocity. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.
[36] H. Roche,et al. Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament , 2010 .
[37] J. A. Marshall. The donation game with roles played between relatives. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.
[38] Lydia M. Hopper,et al. Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[39] Tibor Antala,et al. Sympathy and similarity : The evolutionary dynamics of cooperation , 2009 .
[40] Joanna J. Bryson,et al. Representations underlying social learning and cultural evolution , 2009 .
[41] Manfred Milinski,et al. Multiple gossip statements and their effect on reputation and trustworthiness , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[42] F. C. Santos,et al. Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games , 2008, Nature.
[43] Peter D. Taylor,et al. Evolution of cooperation in a finite homogeneous graph , 2007, Nature.
[44] Jean-Louis Dessalles,et al. Why We Talk: The Evolutionary Origins of Language , 2007 .
[45] Guy Cowlishaw,et al. When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making , 2007, Biology Letters.
[46] Nobuyuki Takahashi,et al. The importance of subjectivity in perceptual errors on the emergence of indirect reciprocity. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.
[47] H. Ohtsuki,et al. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks , 2006, Nature.
[48] L. Gray. Introduction to emergency medicine , 2006, Emergency Medicine Journal.
[49] Yoh Iwasa,et al. The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.
[50] Judith S. Donath,et al. Homophily in online dating: when do you like someone like yourself? , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[51] Yoh Iwasa,et al. How should we define goodness?--reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.
[52] Mayuko Nakamaru,et al. Evolution of rumours that discriminate lying defectors , 2004 .
[53] A. Kacelnik,et al. Information transfer and gain in flocks: the effects of quality and quantity of social information at different neighbour distances , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[54] Michael A Fishman,et al. Indirect reciprocity among imperfect individuals. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.
[55] Karthik Panchanathan,et al. A tale of two defectors: the importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.
[56] Lada A. Adamic,et al. A social network caught in the Web , 2003, First Monday.
[57] M. McPherson,et al. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .
[58] T. Tregenza,et al. Sexual selection and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[59] J. Henrich,et al. The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. , 2001, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.
[60] S. Schulz-Hardt,et al. Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[61] S. Moscovici,et al. Biased information search in group decision making. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[62] U. Dieckmann,et al. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.
[63] R. Boyd,et al. The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. , 1998 .
[64] M. Nowak,et al. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.
[65] R. Nickerson. Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .
[66] A. Pratkanis,et al. Twenty-Five Years of Groupthink Theory and Research: Lessons from the Evaluation of a Theory. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[67] Marc D. Street. Groupthink , 1997 .
[68] D. Funder. On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach. , 1995, Psychological review.
[69] O. Leimar,et al. The evolution of cooperation in mobile organisms , 1993, Animal Behaviour.
[70] R. Trivers. Deceit and self-deception. The relationship between communication and consciousness , 1991 .
[71] N. Emler. A Social Psychology of Reputation , 1990 .
[72] Kalyanmoy Deb,et al. A Comparative Analysis of Selection Schemes Used in Genetic Algorithms , 1990, FOGA.
[73] P. Richerson,et al. The evolution of indirect reciprocity , 1989 .
[74] W. Hamilton,et al. The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.
[75] M. Brewer. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .
[76] D. Kandel. Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.
[77] David D. Gilmore,et al. Varieties of Gossip in a Spanish Rural Community1 , 1978 .
[78] I. Janis. Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. By Irving L. Janis. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972. viii + 276 pp. Map, illustrations, chart, notes, sources, bibliography, and index. Cloth, $7.95; paper $4.50.) , 1973 .
[79] R. Trivers. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.
[80] D. Byrne. Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.