Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF may improve outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV Hodgkin lymphoma treated with brentuximab vedotin plus chemotherapy

Abstract We investigate the impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) primary prophylaxis (G-PP, N = 83) versus no G-PP (N = 579) on safety and efficacy of brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A + AVD) in the ECHELON-1 study of previously untreated stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma. G-PP was associated with lower incidence of ≥ grade 3 neutropenia (29% versus 70%) and febrile neutropenia (11% versus 21%). Fewer dose delays (35% versus 49%), reductions (20% versus 26%), and hospitalizations (29% versus 38%) were observed. Seven neutropenia-associated deaths occurred in the A + AVD arm; none received G-PP. A + AVD with G-PP was associated with decreased risk of a modified progression-free survival event by 26% compared with A + AVD alone (95% CI: 0.40–1.37). G-PP reduced the rate and severity of adverse events, including febrile neutropenia, reduced treatment delays, dose reductions, and discontinuations, and may thus improve efficacy outcomes. These data support G-PP for all patients treated with A + AVD.

[1]  A. Nademanee,et al.  Safety Analysis of Brentuximab Vedotin from the Phase III AETHERA Trial in Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Post-Transplant Consolidation Setting. , 2018, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[2]  J. Connors Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma: New Approaches Based on Novel Therapeutic Agents or Treatment Intensification. , 2018, Cancer journal.

[3]  J. Connors,et al.  Brentuximab Vedotin with Chemotherapy for Stage III or IV Hodgkin's Lymphoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Connors,et al.  Brentuximab vedotin combined with ABVD or AVD for patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  H. Blacklock,et al.  Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving CHOP chemotherapy treatment without adversely affecting their quality of life: cost–benefit and quality of life analysis , 2013, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[6]  A. Rademaker,et al.  G‐CSF is not necessary to maintain over 99% dose–intensity with ABVD in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma: low toxicity and excellent outcomes in a 10‐year analysis , 2007, British journal of haematology.

[7]  C. Desch,et al.  Community-based trial of R-CHOP and maintenance rituximab for intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma with first-cycle filgrastim for older patients. , 2007, Clinical lymphoma & myeloma.

[8]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Björkholm,et al.  Hodgkin's lymphoma in the elderly with special reference to type and intensity of chemotherapy in relation to prognosis. , 2003, Haematologica.

[10]  A. Hagenbeek,et al.  Clinical staging versus laparotomy and combined modality with MOPP versus ABVD in early-stage Hodgkin's disease: the H6 twin randomized trials from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lymphoma Cooperative Group. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  C. Haanen,et al.  Dose intensity of MOPP chemotherapy and survival in Hodgkin's disease. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.