Fatigue assessment of High Frequency Mechanical Impact (HFMI)-improved fillet welds by local approaches

Local fatigue assessment methods like the structural hot spot stress and effective notch stress methods as defined by the International Institute of Welding are widely used by design engineers and researchers to assess the fatigue strength of welded components. This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of published data for welded joints which had been improved using high frequency mechanical impact (HFMI) treatment. All of the published data for HFMI-treated welds are presented in terms of nominal stress. The goal of the current paper is to establish local fatigue assessment procedures for improved fillet welds. In total, 160 published experimental results for longitudinal and cruciform welds subjected to R = 0.1 axial loading are evaluated. Local stress quantities for each joint were assessed based on the finite element analyses and reported nominal stress values. A correction procedure for yield strength that was previously verified for nominal stress-based fatigue assessment is also applied to the local stress methods studied in this paper. For both the structural hot spot stress and effective notch stress methods, sets of characteristic fatigue strength curves as functions of yield strength are proposed and verified. The structural hot spot stress method includes one set of fatigue strength curves for load-carrying welds and a second set for non-load carrying welds. The effective notch stress method includes a single set of curves for all welds. All of the design curves proposed in this study are conservative with respect to available fatigue test data.

[1]  Cetin Morris Sonsino,et al.  Fatigue assessment of welded joints by local approaches Second edition , 2007 .

[2]  Z. Barsoum,et al.  Fatigue Assessment and Lefm Analysis of Cruciform Joints Fabricated with Different Welding Processes , 2007 .

[3]  Wolfgang Fricke,et al.  Fatigue Analysis of Welded Components : Designer's Guide to the Hot-Spot Stress Approach , 2006 .

[4]  Gary Marquis,et al.  A fatigue assessment method based on weld stress , 2006 .

[5]  Yoichi Sumi,et al.  Effect of preload and stress ratio on fatigue strength of welded joints improved by ultrasonic impact treatment , 2013, Welding in the World.

[6]  G. Marquis,et al.  Overview of Fatigue Data for High Frequency Mechanical Impact Treated Welded Joints , 2012, Welding in the World.

[7]  Michael Rygaard Hansen,et al.  Re-analysis of fatigue data for welded joints using the notch stress approach , 2010 .

[8]  G. Marquis,et al.  A round robin study of high-frequency mechanical impact (HFMI)-treated welded joints subjected to variable amplitude loading , 2013, Welding in the World.

[9]  Gary Marquis,et al.  Fatigue strength improvement factors for high strength steel welded joints treated by high frequency mechanical impact , 2012 .

[10]  Lixing Huo,et al.  Investigation of the fatigue behaviour of the welded joints treated by TIG dressing and ultrasonic peening under variable-amplitude load , 2005 .

[11]  W. Weibull A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[12]  Lixing Huo,et al.  Analysis of the S–N curves of welded joints enhanced by ultrasonic peening treatment , 2011 .

[13]  Lixing Huo,et al.  Discussion on fatigue design of welded joints enhanced by ultrasonic peening treatment (UPT) , 2009 .

[14]  J. Schijve,et al.  A normal distribution or a Weibull distribution for fatigue lives , 1993 .

[15]  Cetin Morris Sonsino,et al.  Verification of FAT Values for the Application of the Notch Stress Concept with the Reference Radii Rref = 1.00 and 0.05 mm , 2010 .

[16]  Michael Rygaard Hansen,et al.  Experience with the Notch Stress Approach for Fatigue Assessment of Welded Joints , 2010 .

[17]  Gary Marquis,et al.  Fatigue Strength of a Longitudinal Attachment Improved by Ultrasonic Impact Treatment , 2004 .

[18]  Wolfgang Fricke,et al.  IIW Recommendations for the Fatigue Assessment of Welded Structures by Notch Stress Analysis: IIW-2006-09 , 2012 .