Viscous Effects on Performance of Two-Dimensional Supersonic Linear Micronozzles

A comprehensive numerical investigation of a steady viscous flow through a two-dimensional supersonic linear micronozzle has been performed. The baseline model for the study is derived from the NASAGoddard Space Flight Center microelectromechanical systems-based hydrogen peroxide prototype microthruster. On the microscale, substantial viscous subsonic layers may form on the nozzle expander walls, which reduce thrust and efficiency. One approach to compensate for the presence of these layers has been to designmicronozzleswith expansion angles larger than traditional macroscale nozzles. Numerical simulations have been conducted for a range of Reynolds numbers (Re 15–800) and for expander half-angles of 10–50 deg. Twodifferentmonopropellant fuels have been considered: decomposed 85% pure hydrogen peroxide and decomposed hydrazine. It is found that an inherent tradeoff exists between the viscous losses and the losses resulting from the nonaxial exit flow at larger expansion angles. Our simulations indicate that themaximumnozzle efficiency occurs for bothmonopropellants at a nozzle expansion halfangle of approximately 30 deg, which is significantly larger than that of traditional conical nozzle designs.

[1]  Jeffrey Reichbach,et al.  MICROPROPULSION SYSTEM SELECTION FOR PRECISION FORMATION FLYING SATELLITES , 2001 .

[2]  Alina Alexeenko,et al.  Numerical modeling of axisymmetric and three-dimensional flows in MEMS nozzles , 2000 .

[3]  Andrew D. Ketsdever,et al.  Measurements and Simulation of Orifice Flow for Micropropulsion Testing , 2003 .

[4]  D. Fedosov,et al.  Transient heat transfer and gas flow in a MEMS-based thruster , 2006, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[5]  Ronald W. Humble,et al.  Space Propulsion Analysis and Design , 1995 .

[6]  Alina Alexeenko,et al.  Numerical simulation of high-temperature gas flows in a Millimeter-Scale thruster , 2001 .

[7]  J. Anderson,et al.  Modern Compressible Flow: With Historical Perspective , 1982 .

[8]  K. Breuer,et al.  Systems Design and Performance of Hot and Cold Supersonic Microjets , 2001 .

[9]  Ahsan Choudhuri,et al.  Effects of geometry and ambient pressure on micronozzle flow , 2001 .

[10]  Kenneth S. Breuer,et al.  Viscous Effects in Supersonic MEMS-Fabricated Micronozzles , 1998, Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS).

[11]  R. J. Cassady,et al.  Propulsion requirements and options for the New Millennium Interferometer (DS-3) Mission , 1998 .

[12]  Sergey F. Gimelshein,et al.  Performance analysis of microthrusters based on coupled thermal-fluid modeling and simulation , 2005 .

[13]  Sergey F. Gimelshein,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Axisymmetric and Three-Dimensional Flows in Microelectromechanical Systems Nozzles , 2002 .

[14]  Kenneth S. Breuer,et al.  Mass flow and tangential momentum accommodation in silicon micromachined channels , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Siegfried W. Janson,et al.  Populating and maintaining cluster constellations in low-Earth orbit , 1999 .

[16]  Andrew D. Ketsdever,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Determination of Micropropulsion Device Efficiencies at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2005 .

[17]  Juergen Mueller,et al.  A Review and Applicability Assessment of MEMS Based Microvalve Technologies for Microspacecraft Propulsions , 1999 .

[18]  Michel A. Saad,et al.  Compressible Fluid Flow , 1985 .