Root-contact evaluation by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution.

INTRODUCTION Correct tooth position in the 3 planes of space is a major objective of orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to determine whether a panoramic radiograph (OPT) provides a true assessment of the mesiodistal root relationship of adjacent teeth. METHODS OPTs of 22 patients near the end of treatment with fixed appliances in both arches were taken before debonding. When the roots of adjacent teeth were touching on the OPT, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to show the true root relationships. RESULTS We evaluated 235 interdental sites by OPT and CBCT; 47 areas showed contact between adjacent roots in the OPT images. However, the CBCT images showed true contact in only 5 of these areas; ie, 11% of the diagnoses based on OPT images were true positive, whereas the rest (89%) was false positive. One hundred eighty-eight sites showed no contact in the OPT images; this was confirmed by CBCT. CONCLUSIONS OPT has high sensitivity and relatively high specificity to detect adjacent roots touching each other. Root contacts are overestimated when evaluated by OPT.

[1]  J. Årtun,et al.  Long-term effect of thin interdental alveolar bone on periodontal health after orthodontic treatment. , 1986, Journal of periodontology.

[2]  J Brief,et al.  Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. , 2002, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[3]  J Wolf,et al.  Effect of head positioning in panoramic radiography on vertical measurements: an in vitro study. , 1996, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[4]  P Sukovic,et al.  Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[5]  Christopher J. Lux,et al.  Indications for Digital Volume Tomography in Orthodontics , 2005, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[6]  Deng-Gao Liu,et al.  Localization of impacted maxillary canines and observation of adjacent incisor resorption with cone-beam computed tomography. , 2008, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[7]  David C Hatcher,et al.  Diagnosis goes digital. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  S Hassfeld,et al.  Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate. , 2006, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[9]  Christof Holberg,et al.  Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: Benefits and Limitations , 2005, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[10]  A. Farman,et al.  Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. , 2006, Journal.

[11]  Toru Deguchi,et al.  Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  D. Hatcher,et al.  Mesiodistal root angulation using panoramic and cone beam CT. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[13]  M. A. van 't Hof,et al.  Root proximity as a risk marker for periodontal disease: a case-control study. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[14]  Stavros Kiliaridis,et al.  Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  A. Gianelly,et al.  Orthodontic treatment and periodontal status. , 1979, Journal of periodontology.

[16]  W. McDavid,et al.  Radiographic interproximal angulations: implications for rotational panoramic radiography. , 1993, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[17]  C. Lascala,et al.  Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[18]  M. A. van 't Hof,et al.  Classification, reproducibility and prevalence of root proximity in periodontal patients. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[19]  W. K. Lobb,et al.  Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography , 2007 .

[20]  S. Ruf,et al.  Displaced premolars in panoramic radiography: fact or fallacy? , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[21]  M. Nunn,et al.  Root proximity as a risk factor for progression of alveolar bone loss: the Veterans Affairs Dental Longitudinal Study. , 2008, Journal of periodontology.