Compassion and Prosocial Behavior. Is it Possible to Simulate them Virtually?

In the field of artificial intelligence, a question dealing with computer and cognitive science is arising and becoming more and more crucial: Can we design agents so sophisticated that they are capable of mimicking emotional behaviors in general as well as specific emotions like compassion or empathy? Despite the production of different computational models, their integration with cognitive and psychological theories remains a central problem. Reasons are both methodological and theoretical. Primarily, it is difficult to quantify the impact of such factors as individual differences, inclinations and personality traits. In addition, Agent-Based Models (ABMs) often use linear dynamics, even in describing emotions, without considering the basis of psychophysics. Bearing in mind this and focusing on compassion as a particular emotion, the paper aims to present a “Decalogue” for those interested in designing agents capable of mimicking human emotional behaviors. In the paper, compassion will be translated as prosocial behavior.

[1]  R. Lazarus.  Cognition and motivation in emotion. , 1991, The American psychologist.

[2]  Pietro Terna,et al.  How to build and use agent-based models in social science , 2000 .

[3]  Marc Spraragen,et al.  EmoCog: Computational Integration of Emotion and Cognitive Architecture , 2011, FLAIRS.

[4]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Current status of the empathy-altruism hypothesis. , 1991 .

[5]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  Modeling the Interplay of Emotions and Plans in Multi-Agent Simulations , 2001 .

[6]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[7]  D. Keltner,et al.  Social Functions of Emotions at Four Levels of Analysis , 1999 .

[8]  Margherita Pasini,et al.  Quality and Quantity in Test Validity: How can we be Sure that Psychological Tests Measure what they have to? , 2007 .

[9]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Empathy-based helping: is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Valuations of human lives: normative expectations and psychological mechanisms of (ir)rationality , 2012, Synthese.

[11]  Riccardo Sartori,et al.  Face validity in personality tests: psychometric instruments and projective techniques in comparison , 2010 .

[12]  Paola Ballon,et al.  Estimating Basic Capabilities: A Structural Equation Model Applied to Bolivia , 2008 .

[13]  J. Andreoni.  Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  A computational unification of cognitive behavior and emotion , 2009, Cognitive Systems Research.

[15]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  Insensitivity to the Value of Human Life: A Study of Psychophysical Numbing , 1997 .

[16]  R. Sartori,et al.  Developing empathy in nursing students: a cohort longitudinal study. , 2012, Journal of clinical nursing.

[17]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  AFFECT AND AGENT CONTROL: EXPERIMENTS WITH SIMPLE AFFECTIVE STATES , 2001 .

[18]  Jerry Lin.  Emotion Generation Integration into Cognitive Architecture , 2011, ACII.

[19]  R. Lazarus.  Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. , 1982 .

[20]  S. Ranganathan,et al.  Determinants of charitable donation intentions: a structural equation model† , 2008 .

[21]  Jon K. Maner,et al.  Altruism and egoism: prosocial motivations for helping depend on relationship context , 2007 .

[22]  Riccardo Sartori,et al.  Designing a Homo Psychologicus More Psychologicus: Empirical Results on Value Perception in Support to a New Theoretical Organizational-Economic Agent Based Model , 2014, DCAI.

[23]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  Laughter in Social Robotics – no laughing matter , 2009 .