Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

BACKGROUND Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer world-wide. Increasing the uptake of screening, alongside increasing informed choice is of great importance in controlling this disease through prevention and early detection. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake, and informed uptake of cervical cancer screening. SEARCH STRATEGY Twenty-three electronic databases (to March 2000) were searched with no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or quasi-RCTs of interventions to increase uptake/informed uptake of cervical cancer screening. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Data on study characteristics and quality were extracted independently by two reviewers. Where data were available, relative risks and 95% CI were calculated and a chi-squared test for heterogeneity was performed. MAIN RESULTS Thirty-five studies were included (27 RCTs and eight quasi-RCTs). Heterogeneity between studies limited statistical pooling of data. Overall, however, invitations appear to be effective methods of increasing uptake. In addition, there is limited evidence to support the use of educational materials. The number and quality of included studies limited evidence regarding effectiveness of other interventions. Informed uptake of cervical screening was not considered by any studies. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS There was some evidence to support the use of invitation letters to increase the uptake of cervical screening. There was limited evidence to support educational interventions but it was unclear what format was most effective. The majority of the studies were from developed countries and so the relevance to developing countries is unclear.

[1]  F Berrino,et al.  EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990-94--results and commentary. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  J. Mandelblatt,et al.  Effectiveness of interventions to increase Papanicolaou smear use. , 2003, The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice.

[4]  R. Grol,et al.  Interventions to implement prevention in primary care. , 2001, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  J. Kleijnen,et al.  The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: a systematic review. , 2000, Health technology assessment.

[6]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  C. la Vecchia,et al.  Sexual factors, venereal diseases, and the risk of intraepithelial and invasive cervical neoplasia , 1986, Cancer.