Motor unit size estimation of enlarged motor units with surface electromyography

Surface EMG is hardly used to estimate motor unit (MU) characteristics, while its non‐invasiveness is less stressful for patients and allows multi‐electrode recordings to investigate different sites of the muscle and MU. The present study compares motor unit potentials (MUPs) obtained with surface EMG and macro EMG during voluntary contraction of the biceps brachii muscle of patients with enlarged MUs caused by prior poliomyelitis. Averaged surface MUPs were obtained by means of needle EMG (SMUP1) and surface EMG (SMUP2) triggering. The MUPs area and peak amplitudes correlated well when comparing the macro MUP and SMUP1 of the same MUs. When MU populations of different patients were compared, the SMUP1s and SMUP2s were equally sensitive to pathology as macro MUPs. In this, the late non‐propagating positive wave (only present in unipolar recordings) is more robust than the triphasic propagating wave. Therefore, surface EMG can be used for detecting enlarged MUs. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 21:878–886, 1998.

[1]  Jiri Silny,et al.  Spatial Filtering of Noninvasive Multielectrode EMG: Part I-Introduction to Measuring Technique and Applications , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  P. Rosenfalck.  Intra- and extracellular potential fields of active nerve and muscle fibres. A physico-mathematical analysis of different models. , 1969, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[3]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Simulation and analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern in normal muscle. Part I: Turns and amplitude measurements , 1986, Muscle & nerve.

[4]  E Stålberg,et al.  Macro EMG, a new recording technique. , 1980, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  D. Dumitru,et al.  Far‐field potentials in muscle , 1991, Muscle & nerve.

[6]  E. Stålberg,et al.  Dynamic electromyography and muscle biopsy changes in a 4‐year follow‐up: Study of patients with a history of polio , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[7]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  Volume conduction of the spike of the motor unit potential investigated with a new type of multielectrode. , 1957, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[8]  A. Monster,et al.  Surface electromyogram potentials of motor units; Relationship between potential size and unit location in a large human skeletal muscle , 1980, Experimental Neurology.

[9]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Far-field evoked potential components induced by a propagating generator: computational evidence. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  T. Sadoyama,et al.  Topographical map of innervation zones within single motor units measured with a grid surface electrode , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Motor unit size estimation: confrontation of surface EMG with macro EMG. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  E. Stålberg,et al.  Electromyographic and morphological functional compensation in late poliomyelitis , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[13]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Finite limb dimensions and finite muscle length in a model for the generation of electromyographic signals. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  Jiri Silny,et al.  Spatial Filtering of Noninvasive Multielectrode EMG: Part II-Filter Performance in Theory and Modeling , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  R. Lovelace,et al.  Postpolio muscular atrophy. Diagnostic utility of macroelectromyography. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[16]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Motor unit potential contribution to surface electromyography. , 1997, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[17]  D. Stegeman,et al.  The motor unit potential distribution over the skin surface and its use in estimating the motor unit location. , 1997, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.