Configuration Analysis of Inter-Organizational Information Systems Adoption

Investigations of the adoption of Information Systems (IS) have successfully sought to predict a singular organization’s or user’s propensity to adopt an IS. Encouraged by the success researchers have approached the diffusion of Inter-Organizational Information Systems (IOIS) as a special instance of IS adoption and extended existing diffusion models with extra-organizational factors. Unfortunately, the validity and usefulness of these models have been inadequate in explaining IOIS diffusion. In this paper we dismiss the organization as the unit of analysis and we propose an alternative unit for IOIS adoption studies that we call an adoption configuration. Each such configuration has a diffusion scope determined by its topology, a way of relating adopters defined by its underlying mode of interaction, and a style of using the service determined by the mode of appropriation. Configuration based analysis calls for a redirection of IOIS diffusion studies both at the theoretical and the methodological level. Diffusion theories need to synthesize across multiple adoption levels. Methodologically scholars need to work with sparse and incomplete multi-level process data as to explain the emergence and dynamics of viable (and failed) configurations.

[1]  M. Christopher Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Service (Second Edition) , 1999 .

[2]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  Determinants of EDI adoption in the transportation industry , 1997 .

[3]  George Philip,et al.  An empirical study of the use of EDI in supermarket chains using a new conceptual framework , 1999, J. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Organizational Transformation Using Electronic Data Interchange: The Case of TradeNet in Singapore , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Gyoo Gun Lim,et al.  The impact of partnership attributes on EDI implementation success , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1992 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION : A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 2017 .

[7]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  Building Electronic Trading Infrastructure: a Private or Public Responsibility , 2000 .

[8]  Roger A. Clarke,et al.  Electronic data interchange in international trade: frameworks for the strategic analysis of ocean port communities , 1994, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[9]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[10]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems , 1996, MIS Q..

[11]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Building Electronic Trading Infrastructures: A Public or Private Responsibility? , 2001, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[12]  David J. Miller,et al.  Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis , 1986 .

[13]  C. Oliver Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[14]  Akos Nagy Collaboration and Conflict in the Electronic Integration of Supply Networks , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[15]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  What's Wrong with the Diffusion of Innovation Theory , 2001, Diffusing Software Products and Process Innovations.

[16]  Sue A. Conger,et al.  INNOVATIONS : A CLASSIFICATION BY IT LOCUS OF IMPACT AND RESEARCH APPROACH , 2002 .

[17]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Role of Intermediating Institutions in the Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI): How Industry Associations Intervened in Denmark, Finland, and Hong Kong , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[18]  Kenzo Fujisue,et al.  A comparative analysis of EDI integration in US and Japanese automobile suppliers , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[19]  Juliet Webster,et al.  Networks of collaboration or conflict? Electronic data interchange and power in the supply chain , 1995, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Mary C. Jones,et al.  Towards the development of measures of perceived benefits and compatibility of EDI: a comparative assessment of competing first order factor models , 1998 .

[22]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  R. Emerson Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[24]  Ajit Kambil,et al.  Electronic Integration and Business Network Redesign: a Roles-Linkage Perspective , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  Facilitating Technology Transfer Through Partnership : Learning from Practice and Research , 1997 .

[26]  David R. Mackay,et al.  The impact of EDI on the components sector of the Australian automotive industry , 1993, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Contours of diffusion of electronic data interchange in Finland: Overcoming technological barriers and collaborating to make it happen , 1998, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Hong Kong's EDI bandwagon derailed or on the right track? , 1997 .

[29]  James L. McKenney,et al.  Developing an Historical Tradition in MIS Research , 1997, MIS Q..

[30]  C. Perrow Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[31]  Sree Nilakanta,et al.  Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  O. Williamson Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[33]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[34]  S. Ghoneim,et al.  Drivers and barriers to adopting EDI: a sector analysis of UK industry , 1996 .

[35]  Sherah Kurnia,et al.  A Dyadic Model of Interorganizational Systems (IOS) Adoption Maturity , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[36]  Sherah Kurnia,et al.  The need for a processual view of inter-organizational systems adoption , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Claire Lobet-Maris,et al.  EDI adoption and standard choice: A conceptual model , 1995, ECIS.

[38]  Neil C. Ramiller,et al.  The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation , 1997 .

[39]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[40]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[41]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  The Role of Interorganizational and Organizational Factors on the Decision Mode for Adoption of Interorganizational Systems , 1995 .

[42]  N. Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  EDI in Europe: How It Works in Practice , 1995 .

[43]  Lyne Bouchard,et al.  Decision Criteria in the Adoption of EDI , 1993, ICIS.

[44]  Robert B. Johnston,et al.  The Use of an Explicitly Theory-Driven Data Coding Method for High-Level Theory Testing in IOIS , 2008, ICIS.

[45]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[46]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[47]  Paul J. Hart,et al.  Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange , 1997 .

[48]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Information Systems , 1995 .

[49]  Michael R. Vitale,et al.  Creating Competitive Advantage with Interorganizational Information Systems , 1988, MIS Q..

[50]  Zhenyu Huang,et al.  A Comprehensive Examination of Internet-EDI Adoption , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[51]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[52]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[53]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[54]  Evangelos Katsamakas,et al.  Design and Ownership of Two-Sided Networks: Implications for Internet Platforms , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..