Learned Integrated Sensing Pipeline: Reconfigurable Metasurface Transceivers as Trainable Physical Layer in an Artificial Neural Network

We address the fundamental question of how to optimally probe a scene with electromagnetic (EM) radiation to yield a maximum amount of information relevant to a particular task. Machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as powerful tools to extract task-relevant information from a wide variety of EM measurements, ranging from optics to the microwave domain. However, given the ability to actively illuminate a particular scene with a programmable EM wavefront, it is often not clear what wavefronts optimally encode information for the task at hand (e.g., object detection, classification). Here, we show that by integrating a physical model of scene illumination and detection into a ML pipeline, we can jointly learn optimal sampling and measurement processing strategies for a given task. We consider in simulation the example of classifying objects using microwave radiation produced by dynamic metasurfaces. By integrating an analytical forward model describing the metamaterial elements as coupled dipoles into the ML pipeline, we jointly train analog model weights with digital neural network weights. The learned non-intuitive illumination settings yield a higher classification accuracy using fewer measurements. On the practical level, these results are highly relevant to emerging context-aware systems such as autonomous vehicles, touchless human-interactive devices or within smart health care, where strict time constraints place severe limits on measurement strategies. On the conceptual level, our work serves as a bridge between wavefront shaping and tunable metasurface design on the physical layer and ML techniques on the processing layer.

[1]  Lei Tian,et al.  Deep speckle correlation: a deep learning approach toward scalable imaging through scattering media , 2018, Optica.

[2]  David R. Smith,et al.  Comprehensive simulation platform for a metamaterial imaging system. , 2015, Applied optics.

[3]  M. Fink,et al.  Building three-dimensional images using a time-reversal chaotic cavity , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  J R Fienup,et al.  Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison. , 1982, Applied optics.

[5]  Florent Krzakala,et al.  Reference-less measurement of the transmission matrix of a highly scattering material using a DMD and phase retrieval techniques. , 2015, Optics express.

[6]  Kam Wai Clifford Chan,et al.  High-order ghost imaging using non-Rayleigh speckle sources. , 2016, Optics express.

[7]  Matthew S. Reynolds,et al.  Waveguide-Fed Tunable Metamaterial Element for Dynamic Apertures , 2016, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[8]  Alex Mihailidis,et al.  A Survey on Ambient-Assisted Living Tools for Older Adults , 2013, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[9]  David R. Smith,et al.  Dynamic metamaterial aperture for microwave imaging , 2015 .

[10]  Puxiang Lai,et al.  Optical focusing deep inside dynamic scattering media with near-infrared time-reversed ultrasonically encoded (TRUE) light , 2015, Nature Communications.

[11]  David R. Smith,et al.  Two-Dimensional Dynamic Metasurface Apertures for Computational Microwave Imaging , 2018, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[12]  Ramesh Raskar,et al.  Lensless Imaging With Compressive Ultrafast Sensing , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging.

[13]  Wai Lam Chan,et al.  A single-pixel terahertz imaging system based on compressed sensing , 2008 .

[14]  Min Liang,et al.  Reconfigurable Array Design to Realize Principal Component Analysis (PCA)-Based Microwave Compressive Sensing Imaging System , 2015, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[15]  David R. Smith,et al.  Phaseless coherent and incoherent microwave ghost imaging with dynamic metasurface apertures , 2018, Optica.

[16]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  Soli , 2016, ACM Trans. Graph..

[17]  David R. Smith,et al.  Terahertz compressive imaging with metamaterial spatial light modulators , 2014, Nature Photonics.

[18]  David R. Smith,et al.  Infrared metamaterial phase holograms. , 2012, Nature materials.

[19]  Benjamin Fuchs Antenna Selection for Array Synthesis Problems , 2017, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[20]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[21]  David R. Smith,et al.  Metamaterial Apertures for Computational Imaging , 2013, Science.

[22]  J. A. Decker,et al.  Hadamard transform imager and imaging spectrometer. , 1976, Applied optics.

[23]  David R. Smith,et al.  Polarizability extraction of complementary metamaterial elements in waveguides for aperture modeling , 2017 .

[24]  Yibo Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning Microscopy , 2017, ArXiv.

[25]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[26]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[27]  David R. Smith,et al.  Characterization of complementary electric field coupled resonant surfaces , 2008 .

[28]  Justin Lee,et al.  Lensless computational imaging through deep learning , 2017, ArXiv.

[29]  Mark A Neifeld,et al.  Feature-specific imaging. , 2003, Applied optics.

[30]  Navid Borhani,et al.  Learning to see through multimode fibers , 2018, Optica.

[31]  Laurent Daudet,et al.  Imaging With Nature: Compressive Imaging Using a Multiply Scattering Medium , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[32]  Hui Cao,et al.  Customizing Speckle Intensity Statistics , 2017, 1711.11128.

[33]  S. Gigan,et al.  Focusing light through dynamical samples using fast continuous wavefront optimization. , 2017, Optics letters.

[34]  Ramesh Raskar,et al.  Object classification through scattering media with deep learning on time resolved measurement. , 2017, Optics express.

[35]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Antenna array pattern synthesis via convex optimization , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[36]  Zongfu Yu,et al.  Training Deep Neural Networks for the Inverse Design of Nanophotonic Structures , 2017, 2019 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[37]  Pavlo Molchanov,et al.  Multi-sensor system for driver's hand-gesture recognition , 2015, 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG).

[38]  Rob Miller,et al.  Smart Homes that Monitor Breathing and Heart Rate , 2015, CHI.

[39]  Angelika Fruehauf Waves And Imaging Through Complex Media , 2016 .

[40]  Farhan Bin Khalid,et al.  Integrated target detection hardware unit for automotive radar applications , 2017, 2017 European Radar Conference (EURAD).

[41]  William P. Delaney,et al.  The Development of Phased-Array Radar Technology , 2000 .

[42]  Alexander Y. Piggott,et al.  Inverse design and demonstration of a compact and broadband on-chip wavelength demultiplexer , 2015, Nature Photonics.

[43]  Joshua Brake,et al.  Focusing through dynamic tissue with millisecond digital optical phase conjugation. , 2015, Optica.

[44]  Kirk A. Fuller,et al.  Light Scattering by Agglomerates: Coupled Electric and Magnetic Dipole Method , 1994 .

[45]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Topology optimization for nano‐photonics , 2011 .

[46]  Christos Katrakazas,et al.  Real-time motion planning methods for autonomous on-road driving: State-of-the-art and future research directions , 2015 .

[47]  T. Zwick,et al.  Millimeter-Wave Technology for Automotive Radar Sensors in the 77 GHz Frequency Band , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[48]  Yi Yang,et al.  Nanophotonic particle simulation and inverse design using artificial neural networks , 2018, Science Advances.