Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts.

The frictional behavior of four conventional and four self-ligating brackets were simulated using a mechanical testing machine. Analyses of the two-bracket types were completed by drawing samples of three standardized archwires through quadrants of typodont models in the dry/wet states. Pretreatment typodonts of an oral cavity featured progressively malocclused quadrants. As nominal dimensions of the archwires were increased, the drawing forces of all brackets increased at different rates. When coupled with a small wire, the self-ligating brackets performed better than the conventional brackets. For the 0.014-inch wires in the upper right quadrant, the maximum drawing forces averaged 125 and 810 cN for self-ligating and conventional brackets, respectively. When coupled with larger wires, various designs interchangeably displayed superior performance. For the 0.019- x 0.025-inch wires in the upper left quadrant, the maximum drawing forces averaged 1635 and 2080 cN for self-ligating and conventional brackets, respectively. As the malocclusion increased, the drawing forces increased. For example, in the least malocclused quadrant and with the smallest wire, maximum drawing forces for self-ligating and conventional brackets averaged 80 and 810 cN, respectively, whereas in the most malocclused quadrant tested with the same wire size, maximum drawing forces for self-ligating and conventional brackets averaged 870 and 1345 cN, respectively. For maximum values between the dry and wet states, significant differences between ambient states existed only for the In-Ovation brackets in the lower left quadrant. These test outcomes illustrated how bracket design, wire size, malocclusion, and ambient state influenced drawing forces.

[1]  R. Kusy,et al.  Effect of salivary viscosity on frictional coefficients of orthodontic archwire/bracket couples , 1995 .

[2]  K. Ison,et al.  Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[3]  R P Kusy,et al.  Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  W. Heiser Time: a new orthodontic philosophy. , 1998, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[5]  D. Smith,et al.  Time savings with self-ligating brackets. , 1990, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[6]  R. Kusy,et al.  Evaluation of titanium brackets for orthodontic treatment: Part II--The active configuration. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  R J Nikolai,et al.  A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.

[8]  R. Kusy,et al.  Resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances in the dry and wet states: influence of archwire alloy, interbracket distance, and bracket engagement. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  R. Kusy,et al.  Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  P. Jost-Brinkmann,et al.  [The effect of physiological tooth mobility on the friction between the bracket and the arch]. , 1991, Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie.

[11]  Arthur D. Brickman,et al.  Mechanical Measurement and Instrumentation , 1966 .

[12]  R. Kusy,et al.  Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  R. Kusy,et al.  Influence of archwire and bracket dimensions on sliding mechanics: derivations and determinations of the critical contact angles for binding. , 1999, European journal of orthodontics.

[14]  G H Hanson,et al.  The SPEED system: a report on the development of a new edgewise appliance. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.

[15]  P. Shivapuja,et al.  A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  M. Sherriff,et al.  A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures. , 1998, European journal of orthodontics.

[17]  J R Bednar,et al.  A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[18]  J L Berger,et al.  The influence of the SPEED bracket's self-ligating design on force levels in tooth movement: a comparative in vitro study. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[19]  R. M. Little,et al.  The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. , 1975, American journal of orthodontics.

[20]  B. Melsen,et al.  Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. , 1998, European journal of orthodontics.

[21]  S. Jones,et al.  A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. , 1997, British journal of orthodontics.

[22]  Damon Dh The Damon low-friction bracket: a biologically compatible straight-wire system. , 1998 .