The influence of surface and deep cues on primary and secondary school students' assessment of relevance in Web menus

Abstract Two experiments investigated primary and secondary school students' Web menu selection strategies using simulated Web search tasks. It was hypothesized that students' selections of websites depend on their perception and integration of multiple relevance cues. More specifically, students should be able to disentangle superficial cues (e.g., keywords and typographical emphasis) from deep semantic cues. Experiment 1 found that 5th and 7th graders' selections were strongly influenced by superficial relevance cues. The influence of superficial cues decreased in 9th and 12th graders. Experiment 2 examined the influence of prior elaboration of the search topic on 5th and 7th graders' website selection. Reading a short text about the search topic prior to selecting websites increased good readers' selection of relevant websites. Poor readers' selection performance was lower and unaffected by the task context manipulation. The results are discussed in terms of students' acquisition of flexible reading skills that include an awareness of the contextual demands. Implications for the use of Web-based tasks in instructional settings are considered.

[1]  P. David Pearson Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[2]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994 .

[3]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Why Are Poor Comprehenders Inefficient Searchers? An Investigation into the Effects of Text Representation and Spatial Memory on the Ability To Locate Information in Text. , 2000 .

[4]  Julie Coiro,et al.  Exploring the Online Reading Comprehension Strategies Used by Sixth-Grade Skilled Readers to Search for and Locate Information on the Internet. , 2007 .

[5]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Structural Aspects of Constructing Meaning From Text , 2000 .

[6]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Improving Students' Ability to Identify and Use Source Information , 2002 .

[7]  John Cresswell,et al.  Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy : a framework for PISA 2006 , 2006 .

[8]  J. Oakhill,et al.  Children's Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills. , 2004 .

[9]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  The Effects of Tasks on Integrating Information From Multiple Documents , 2008 .

[10]  Margaret-Ellen Pipe,et al.  Enhancing children's event recall after long delays , 2007 .

[11]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  Information problem solving instruction: Some cognitive and metacognitive issues , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Myint Swe Khine,et al.  Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs: Epistemological Studies across Diverse Cultures , 2007 .

[13]  Irwin S. Kirsch,et al.  Distinctions between reading comprehension and locating information in text. , 1987 .

[14]  A. Graesser,et al.  Handbook of discourse processes , 2003 .

[15]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[16]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Personal Epistemology, Understanding of Multiple Texts, and Learning Within Internet Technologies , 2008 .

[17]  Hans van der Meij,et al.  Supporting reflective web searching in elementary schools , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Ivor K. Davies,et al.  Preinstructional Strategies: The Role of Pretests, Behavioral Objectives, Overviews and Advance Organizers , 1976 .

[19]  T. Van de Cruys,et al.  Mining for meaning , 2010 .

[20]  Dagobert Soergel Indexing and retrieval performance: the logical evidence , 1994 .

[21]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning , 2006 .

[22]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Information-problem solving: A review of problems students encounter and instructional solutions , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Cesare Cornoldi,et al.  Self‐monitoring in poor and good reading comprehenders and their use of strategy , 1998 .

[24]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  Actes du quatrième colloque "Hypermédias et Apprentissages" , 1998 .

[25]  Steven A. Stahl,et al.  Prior knowledge and difficult vocabulary in the comprehension of unfamiliar text. , 1989 .

[26]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  The Effect of General Relevance Instructions on Shallow and Deeper Learning and Reading Time , 2006 .

[27]  Ivan K. Ash,et al.  Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks , 2009 .

[28]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Locating Information in Documents: Examination of a Cognitive Model. , 1988 .

[29]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Information problem solving by experts and novices: analysis of a complex cognitive skill , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  J. Dinet,et al.  An exploratory study of adolescent's perceptions of the Web , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[31]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Expectations and memory in link search , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  William P. Eveland,et al.  User Control and Structural Isomorphism or Disorientation and Cognitive Load? , 2001, Commun. Res..

[33]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  SEEK Web tutor: fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption , 2007 .

[34]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  Cognitive Aspects of Electronic Text Processing , 1996 .

[35]  Matthew T. McCrudden,et al.  Relevance and Goal-Focusing in Text Processing , 2007 .

[36]  Ingrid Hsieh-Yee Research on Web Search Behavior. , 2001 .

[37]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  Impact of Question-Answering Tasks on Search Processes and Reading Comprehension. , 2009 .

[38]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Effects of the metacognitive computer-tool met.a.ware on the web search of laypersons , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension , 2007 .

[40]  Stefano Mizzaro,et al.  How many relevances in information retrieval? , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[41]  Children's Knowledge of Structural Properties of Expository Text. , 1986 .