Embracing complexity: A transdisciplinary conceptual framework for understanding behavior change in the context of development-focused interventions

Abstract Many interventions that aim to improve the livelihoods of vulnerable people in low-income settings fail because the behavior of the people intended to benefit is not well understood and /or not reflected in the design of interventions. Methods for understanding and situating human behavior in the context of development interventions tend to emphasize experimental approaches to objectively isolate key drivers of behavior. However, such methods often do not account for the importance of contextual factors and the wider system. In this paper we propose a conceptual framework to support intervention design that links behavioral insights with service design, a branch of the creative field of design. To develop the framework, we use three case studies conducted in Kenya and Zambia focusing on the uptake of new technologies and services by individuals and households. We demonstrate how the framework can be useful for mapping individuals’ experiences of a new technology or service and, based on this, identify key parameters to support lasting behavior change. The framework reflects how behavior change takes place in the context of complex social-ecological systems – that change over time, and in which a diverse range of actors operate at different levels – with the aim of supporting the design and delivery of more robust development-oriented interventions.

[1]  S. Thalberg Navigating Social Ecological Systems Building Resilience For Complexity And Change , 2016 .

[2]  Lashawn Richburg-Hayes,et al.  Nudging Change in Human Services: Final Report of the Behavioral Interventions to Advance Self-Sufficiency (BIAS) Project , 2017 .

[3]  Lisa Malmberg Building Design Capability in the Public Sector : Expanding the Horizons of Development , 2017 .

[4]  L. Evans,et al.  Synthesis, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Social-Ecological Resilience through the Lens of the Social Sciences: Contributions, Critical Reflections, and Constructive Debate Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: insights from anthropology and political ecology , 2014 .

[5]  Fabian Segelström,et al.  Stakeholder Engagement for Service Design: How service designers identify and communicate insights , 2013 .

[6]  Jason Brownlee,et al.  Complex adaptive systems , 2007 .

[7]  Edward Miguel,et al.  Appliance Ownership and Aspirations Among Electric Grid and Home Solar Households in Rural Kenya , 2016 .

[8]  Jikun Huang,et al.  Risk preferences and pesticide use by cotton farmers in China , 2013 .

[9]  Sendhil Mullainathan,et al.  Behavioral Design: A New Approach to Development Policy , 2014, Review of Income and Wealth.

[10]  Eric A. Finkelstein,et al.  Use of Behavior Change Techniques in Clean Cooking Interventions: A Review of the Evidence and Scorecard of Effectiveness , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[11]  C. Bason Leading public design: Discovering human-centred governance , 2017 .

[12]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability , 2010 .

[13]  S. Imenda Is There a Conceptual Difference between Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks? , 2014 .

[14]  Ezio Manzini,et al.  Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation , 2015 .

[15]  K. Stamoulis,et al.  Applying Behavioural Economics to International Development Policy , 2006 .

[16]  T. Huld,et al.  Energy solutions in rural Africa: mapping electrification costs of distributed solar and diesel generation versus grid extension , 2011 .

[17]  Oriana Bandiera,et al.  No Margin, no Mission? A Field Experiment on Incentives for public service delivery , 2014 .

[18]  Arjan Verschoor,et al.  Lab and life: Does risky choice behaviour observed in experiments reflect that in the real world? , 2016 .

[19]  Jonathan Robinson,et al.  Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Kenya , 2009 .

[20]  R. Aunger,et al.  Behaviour Centred Design: towards an applied science of behaviour change , 2016, Health psychology review.

[21]  D. Haydon,et al.  Alternative stable states in ecology , 2003 .

[22]  K. Arrow,et al.  Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: modeling and policy implications , 2012, Environment and Development Economics.

[23]  Charles Abraham,et al.  Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data). , 2015, Health technology assessment.

[24]  Peter H. Jones,et al.  Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems , 2014 .

[25]  Fiona Lambe,et al.  Beyond buying: The application of service design methodology to understand adoption of clean cookstoves in Kenya and Zambia , 2018 .

[26]  R. Fisk,et al.  Upframing Service Design and Innovation for Research Impact , 2018 .

[27]  C. Abraham,et al.  The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions , 2013, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[28]  Bela H. Banathy,et al.  Designing social systems in a changing world , 1996 .

[29]  Brendon R. Barnes,et al.  Behavioural Change, Indoor Air Pollution and Child Respiratory Health in Developing Countries: A Review , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[30]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons , 1999 .

[31]  Catherine Brady,et al.  Getting to the Top , 1991 .

[32]  Frank Schilbach,et al.  Alcohol and Self-Control: A Field Experiment in India. , 2019, The American economic review.

[33]  Bo Edvardsson,et al.  Customer Integration within Service Development : A review of methods and an analysis of insitu and exsitu contributions , 2012 .

[34]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Improving immunisation coverage in rural India: clustered randomised controlled evaluation of immunisation campaigns with and without incentives , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Biodiversity loss: Biodiversity in the functioning of ecosystems: an ecological synthesis , 1995 .

[36]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[37]  M. Côte,et al.  Resilience thinking meets social theory , 2012 .

[38]  O’Donoghue,et al.  Getting to the Top of Mind : How Reminders Increase Saving , 2014 .

[39]  Marc Stickdorn,et al.  This is service design thinking : basics--tools--cases : 領域横断的アプローチによるビジネスモデルの設計 , 2012 .

[40]  H. Allcott,et al.  The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation , 2012 .

[41]  Daniela Sangiorgi,et al.  Design for Value Co-Creation: Exploring Synergies Between Design for Service and Service Logic , 2014 .

[42]  Sousa Lourenco Joana,et al.  Behavioural Insights Applied to Policy - European Report 2016 , 2016 .

[43]  A. Escobar,et al.  Response: Design for/by [and from] the ‘global South.’ , 2017 .

[44]  S. Michie,et al.  The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[45]  Hans-Joachim Mosler,et al.  A systematic approach to behavior change interventions for the water and sanitation sector in developing countries: a conceptual model, a review, and a guideline , 2012, International journal of environmental health research.

[46]  Cassilde Muhoza,et al.  Exploring household energy transitions in rural Zambia from the user perspective , 2018, Energy Policy.

[47]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[48]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.