Goblet cell density and distribution in cats with clinically and histologically normal conjunctiva.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate goblet cell density (GCD) and distribution in cats without clinical evidence of ocular surface disease and without histologic evidence of conjunctival disease. ANIMALS STUDIED Fourteen Domestic Shorthair cats euthanized for reasons unrelated to this study. PROCEDURES Before euthanasia, cats were verified using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and fluorescein staining to be free of eyelid or ocular surface abnormalities. Immediately after euthanasia, bilateral conjunctival specimens including third eyelid (TEL) were collected, routinely processed, and stained with periodic acid-Schiff and hematoxylin and eosin. Thirteen conjunctival regions were identified. For each region, GCD was expressed as the percentage of goblet cells/200 basal epithelial cells. RESULTS Mean GCD ranged widely by region: anterior surface of the TEL = 48.8%, fornicial regions = 47.0%, palpebral regions = 38.5%, bulbar regions = 19.6%, and posterior surface of the TEL = 12.6%. The anterior surface of the TEL had significantly higher GCD than did the bulbar and the palpebral regions, but not the fornicial regions. Bulbar conjunctiva had significantly lower GCD than did all other conjunctival regions except the posterior surface of the TEL. No significant difference was noted between GCD of male versus female cats, dorsal versus ventral regions, or lateral versus medial regions. CONCLUSIONS Although conjunctival GCD ranged widely by region, the anterior surface of the TEL appears to be an excellent location for assessing conjunctival goblet cells in cats because this area has high GCD and is more readily accessible than is the palpebral, fornicial, or bulbar conjunctiva.

[1]  A. Tichy,et al.  Impression cytology: a novel sampling technique for conjunctival cytology of the feline eye. , 2015, Veterinary ophthalmology.

[2]  M. Doughty.  A systematic assessment of goblet cell sampling of the bulbar conjunctiva by impression cytology. , 2015, Experimental eye research.

[3]  M. Doughty.  Assessment of Goblet Cell Orifice Distribution Across the Rabbit Bulbar Conjunctiva Based on Numerical Density and Nearest Neighbors Analysis , 2013, Current eye research.

[4]  A. Tichy,et al.  Investigations on the conjunctival goblet cells and the characteristics of the glands associated with the eye in chinchillas (Chinchilla Laniger). , 2012, Veterinary ophthalmology.

[5]  M. Doughty.  Goblet cells of the normal human bulbar conjunctiva and their assessment by impression cytology sampling. , 2012, The ocular surface.

[6]  A. Murakami,et al.  Distribution of goblet cells and MUC5AC mRNA in the canine nictitating membrane. , 2010, Experimental eye research.

[7]  C. Reilly,et al.  Effects of feline herpesvirus type 1 on tear film break-up time, Schirmer tear test results, and conjunctival goblet cell density in experimentally infected cats. , 2009, American journal of veterinary research.

[8]  F. Mantelli,et al.  Functions of ocular surface mucins in health and disease , 2008, Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology.

[9]  J. Laus,et al.  Conjunctival impression cytology in dogs. , 2005, Veterinary ophthalmology.

[10]  B. Grahn,et al.  Qualitative tear film and conjunctival goblet cell assessment of cats with corneal sequestra. , 2005, Veterinary ophthalmology.

[11]  Vesna Vujković,et al.  Distribution and density of conjunctival goblet cells. , 2002, Medicinski pregled.

[12]  B. Grahn,et al.  Ulcerative keratitis associated with qualitative tear film abnormalities in cats. , 1999, Veterinary ophthalmology.

[13]  P. Aragona,et al.  Morphological differentiation of the conjunctival goblet cells in the chick (Gallus domesticus) , 1997, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[14]  C. P. Moore.  Qualitative tear film disease. , 1990, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[15]  Ben W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of inflammation and aqueous tear film deficiency on conjunctival morphology and ocular mucus composition in cats. , 1990, American journal of veterinary research.

[16]  S. Tseng,et al.  Morphogenesis of rat conjunctival goblet cells. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  E. Nordheim,et al.  Density and distribution of canine conjunctival goblet cells. , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  J. Wright,et al.  Conjunctival goblet cell densities in ocular surface disease. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  J. Friend,et al.  Goblet cell density in ocular surface disease. A better indicator than tear mucin. , 1983, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  A. Tichy,et al.  Investigations on the conjunctival goblet cells and on the characteristics of glands associated with the eye in the guinea pig. , 2011, Veterinary ophthalmology.

[21]  E. Guillot,et al.  Comparison of cytologic and histologic evaluations of the conjunctiva in the normal equine eye. , 2007, Veterinary ophthalmology.

[22]  J. Rohen,et al.  Specialized cell types and their regional distribution in the conjunctival epithelium of the cynomolgus monkey , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[23]  T. Sun,et al.  Label-retaining cells are preferentially located in fornical epithelium: implications on conjunctival epithelial homeostasis. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  U. Schramm,et al.  Functional morphology of the nictitating membrane in the domestic cat. , 1994, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[25]  T. Hida,et al.  Morphological and histochemical studies of goblet cells in developing human conjunctiva. , 1992, Japanese journal of ophthalmology.