How Can Material Stock Studies Assist the Implementation of the Circular Economy in Cities?

City and regional planners have recently started exploring a circular approach to urban development. Meanwhile, industrial ecologists have been designing and refining methodologies to quantify and locate material flows and stocks within systems. This Perspective explores to which extent material stock studies can contribute to urban circularity, focusing on the built environment. We conducted a critical literature review of material stock studies that claim they contribute to circular cities. We classified each article according to a matrix we developed leveraging existing circular built environment frameworks of urban planning, architecture, and civil engineering and included the terminology of material stock studies. We found that, out of 271 studies, only 132 provided information that could be relevant to the implementation of circular cities, albeit to vastly different degrees of effectiveness. Of these 132, only 26 reported their results in a spatially explicit manner, which is fundamental to the effective actuation of circular city strategies. We argue that future research should strive to provide spatial data, avoid being siloed, and increase engagement with other sociopolitical fields to address the different needs of the relevant stakeholders for urban circularity.

[1]  J. Kirchherr Bullshit in the Sustainability and Transitions Literature: a Provocation , 2022, Circular Economy and Sustainability.

[2]  J. Marin,et al.  Uncovering the Holistic Pathways to Circular Cities—The Case of Alberta, Canada , 2022, Highlights of Sustainability.

[3]  A. Khan,et al.  Space Matters: Barriers and Enablers for Embedding Urban Circularity Practices in the Brussels Capital Region , 2022, Frontiers in Built Environment.

[4]  R. Charef Supporting construction stakeholders with the circular economy: A trans-scaler framework to understand the holistic approach , 2022, Cleaner Engineering and Technology.

[5]  Wendy Wuyts,et al.  The Development of Spatial Circularity Discourse in Japan: Ecomodernist, Territorialised, or Both? The Story of Onomichi’s Wastescapes , 2022, Circular Economy and Sustainability.

[6]  T. Wiedmann,et al.  Transdisciplinary resource monitoring is essential to prioritize circular economy strategies in cities , 2021, Environmental Research Letters.

[7]  T. Fishman,et al.  Prospects for a saturation of humanity’s resource use? An analysis of material stocks and flows in nine world regions from 1900 to 2035 , 2021, Global Environmental Change.

[8]  Karel Van den Berghe,et al.  Making it Concrete: Analysing the Role of Concrete Plants’ Locations for Circular City Policy Goals , 2021, Frontiers in Built Environment.

[9]  Yan Zhang,et al.  The evolution of material stock research: From exploring to rising to hot studies , 2021, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[10]  Martin Mayfield,et al.  A scalable data collection, characterization, and accounting framework for urban material stocks , 2021, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[11]  G. Cloutier,et al.  Building territorial value within local circular economy’s projects: lessons from French scholars’ studies , 2021, Local Environment.

[12]  K. Islam,et al.  Estimating the total in-use stock of Laos using dynamic material flow analysis and nighttime light , 2021, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[13]  P. Meli,et al.  Linking public urban green spaces and human well-being: A systematic review , 2021 .

[14]  Mihály Dombi The golden rule of material stock accumulation , 2021 .

[15]  João C. G. Lanzinha,et al.  Proposal for a Methodology for Sustainable Rehabilitation Strategies of the Existing Building Stock—The Ponte Gêa Neighborhood , 2021, Designs.

[16]  Michael Martin,et al.  Circularity for circularity's sake? Scoping review of assessment methods for environmental performance in the circular economy. , 2021 .

[17]  K. Anastasiades,et al.  Standardisation: An essential enabler for the circular reuse of construction components? A trajectory for a cleaner European construction industry , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[18]  M. Osmani,et al.  The role of anthropogenic resource classification in supporting the transition to a circular economy , 2021 .

[19]  Ping Guo,et al.  Regeneration path of abandoned industrial buildings: The moderating role of the goodness of regeneration mode , 2021 .

[20]  Shaoqing Dai,et al.  High spatial resolution mapping of steel resources accumulated above ground in mainland China: Past trends and future prospects , 2021 .

[21]  E. Tilley,et al.  Innovating traditional building materials in Chembe, Malawi: assessing post-consumer waste glass and burnt clay bricks for performance and circularity , 2021 .

[22]  S. Huuhka,et al.  Stocks and flows of buildings: Analysis of existing, demolished, and constructed buildings in Tampere, Finland, 2000–2018 , 2021, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[23]  T. Fishman,et al.  A framework of indicators for associating material stocks and flows to service provisioning: Application for Japan 1990–2015 , 2021 .

[24]  Eunhye Kim,et al.  Inflows and Outflows from Material Stocks of Buildings and Networks and their Space-Differentiated Drivers: The Case Study of the Paris Region , 2021, Sustainability.

[25]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Linking Housing Policy, Housing Typology, and Residential Energy Demand in the United States. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Komal Habib,et al.  Estimating the construction material stocks in two Canadian cities: A case study of Kitchener and Waterloo , 2021 .

[27]  C. Blanquart,et al.  Territorial development process based on the circular economy: a systematic literature review , 2021, European Planning Studies.

[28]  E. van der Voet,et al.  Matching Demolition and Construction Material Flows, an Urban Mining Case Study , 2021 .

[29]  M. Bianchi,et al.  Towards a territorial definition of a circular economy: exploring the role of territorial factors in closed-loop systems , 2021 .

[30]  R. Baumgartner,et al.  The narrative of sustainability and circular economy - A longitudinal review of two decades of research , 2020 .

[31]  H. Tanikawa,et al.  A spatiotemporal urban metabolism model for the Canberra suburb of Braddon in Australia , 2020 .

[32]  T. Fishman,et al.  Urban development and sustainability challenges chronicled by a century of construction material flows and stocks in Tiexi, China , 2020, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[33]  H. Tanikawa,et al.  Understanding and Managing Vacant Houses in Support of a Material Stock-Type Society—The Case of Kitakyushu, Japan , 2020, Sustainability.

[34]  Sébastien Lasvaux,et al.  Uncertainty of building elements’ service lives in building LCA & LCC: What matters? , 2020 .

[35]  Gang Liu,et al.  Developing an urban resource cadaster for circular economy: A case of Odense, Denmark. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  C. Gasol,et al.  Methodological framework for the implementation of circular economy in urban systems , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[37]  Piero Morseletto Targets for a circular economy , 2020 .

[38]  T. Graedel,et al.  Buildings as a global carbon sink , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[39]  C. Fivet,et al.  Nothing is lost, nothing is created, everything is reused: structural design for a circular economy , 2020, The Structural Engineer.

[40]  Danièle Waldmann,et al.  A material and component bank to facilitate material recycling and component reuse for a sustainable construction: concept and preliminary study , 2019, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[41]  Thomas E Graedel,et al.  Material Flow Analysis from Origin to Evolution. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  F. Schultmann,et al.  An Integrated Material Flows, Stakeholders and Policies Approach to Identify and Exploit Regional Resource Potentials , 2019, Ecological Economics.

[43]  Dominik Wiedenhofer,et al.  Taking stock of built environment stock studies: Progress and prospects. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[44]  L. Cheah,et al.  Residential building material stocks and component-level circularity: The case of Singapore , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[45]  Heinz Schandl,et al.  A spatial analysis of material stock accumulation and demolition waste potential of buildings: A case study of Padua , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[46]  Joanna Williams,et al.  Circular cities , 2019, Circular Cities.

[47]  Yutao Wang,et al.  Cities: The core of climate change mitigation , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[48]  L. Amenta,et al.  Beyond Wastescapes: Towards Circular Landscapes. Addressing the Spatial Dimension of Circularity through the Regeneration of Wastescapes , 2018, Sustainability.

[49]  John E. Fernández,et al.  Embodied GHGs in a Fast Growing City: Looking at the Evolution of a Dwelling Stock using Structural Element Breakdown and Policy Scenarios , 2018 .

[50]  M. Obersteiner,et al.  Resource nexus perspectives towards the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals , 2018, Nature Sustainability.

[51]  Julie Marin Circulariteit ontwerpen: Vier agenda's , 2018, AGORA Magazine.

[52]  Alexander Koutamanis,et al.  Urban mining and buildings: A review of possibilities and limitations , 2018, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[53]  J. Marin,et al.  Interpreting Circularity. Circular City Representations Concealing Transition Drivers , 2018 .

[54]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? — Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options , 2017, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[55]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions , 2017 .

[56]  Shelie A. Miller,et al.  Emerging challenges and opportunities for the food–energy–water nexus in urban systems , 2017 .

[57]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  The Material Stock–Flow–Service Nexus: A New Approach for Tackling the Decoupling Conundrum , 2017 .

[58]  Nancy Bocken,et al.  Circular Cities: Mapping Six Cities in Transition , 2017 .

[59]  André Stephan,et al.  Quantifying and mapping embodied environmental requirements of urban building stocks , 2017 .

[60]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century and require half of annual resource use , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  Yongxiang Yang,et al.  Recycling of metals from urban mines – a strategic evaluation , 2016 .

[62]  J. Newell,et al.  The boundaries of urban metabolism , 2015 .

[63]  E. Duchemin,et al.  The boundaries of urban metabolism Towards a political–industrial ecology , 2015 .

[64]  Katy Roelich,et al.  Managing Critical Materials with a Technology-Specific Stocks and Flows Model , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[65]  H. Eakin,et al.  An obsolete dichotomy? Rethinking the rural–urban interface in terms of food security and production in the global south. , 2011, The Geographical journal.

[66]  C. Kennedy,et al.  The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[67]  Anne Power,et al.  Housing and sustainability: demolition or refurbishment? , 2010 .

[68]  Hiroaki Takiguchi,et al.  Japanese 3R Policies Based on Material Flow Analysis , 2008 .

[69]  A. Wandl,et al.  Territorialising Circularity , 2022, Regenerative Territories.

[70]  K. Kobbacy,et al.  Building and Environment , 2016 .

[71]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Building service life and its effect on the life cycle embodied energy of buildings , 2015 .

[72]  Daniel B. Müller,et al.  The Role of In-Use Stocks in the Social Metabolism and in Climate Change Mitigation , 2013 .