Multiattribute Decision Making in Context: A Dynamic Neural Network Methodology

A theoretical structure for multiattribute decision making is presented, based on a dynamical system for interactions in a neural network incorporating affective and rational variables. This enables modeling of problems that elude two prevailing economic decision theories: subjective expected utility theory and prospect theory. The network is unlike some that fit economic data by choosing optimal weights or coefficients within a predetermined mathematical framework. Rather, the framework itself is based on principles used elsewhere to model many other cognitive and behavioral data, in a manner approximating how humans perform behavioral functions. Different, interconnected modules within the network encode (a) attributes of objects among which choices are made, (b) object categories, (c) and goals of the decision maker. An example is utilized to simulate the actual consumer choice between old and new versions of Coca-Cola. Potential applications are also discussed to market decisions involving negotiations between participants, such as international petroleum traders.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[2]  D. Levine.  Introduction to Neural and Cognitive Modeling , 2018 .

[3]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  Nonisomorphism, Shadow Features and Imputed Preferences , 1985 .

[4]  Thomas Oliver,et al.  The real Coke, the real story , 1986 .

[5]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Telling lies. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Widrow,et al.  DARPA Neural Network Stdy , 1988 .

[7]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  An adaptive approach to human decision making: Learning theory, decision theory, and human performance. , 1992 .

[8]  T. M. Brown.  HABIT PERSISTENCE AND LAGS IN CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR , 1952 .

[9]  A. Amsel.  Frustrative nonreward in partial reinforcement and discrimination learning: some recent history and a theoretical extension. , 1962, Psychological review.

[10]  S. Grossberg.  A psychophysiological theory of reinforcement, drive, motivation, and attention , 1987 .

[11]  John M. Miyamoto,et al.  Old and New Roles for Expected and Generalized Utility Theories , 1992 .

[12]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[13]  R Pool,et al.  Putting game theory to the test , 1995, Science.

[14]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Toward the Demise of Economic Man and Woman; Bottom Lines from Santa Cruz , 1992 .

[15]  Ellen J. Langer,et al.  The illusion of calculated decisions. , 1994 .

[16]  Daniel S. Levine,et al.  Modeling some effects of frontal lobe damage--Novelty and perseveration , 1989, Neural Networks.

[17]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Some Limits of Rational Man Organizational Theory , 1973 .

[18]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of decision making under risk: affective balance and cognitive-emotional interactions. , 1988, Psychological review.

[19]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of attentionally modulated Pavlovian conditioning: Conditioned reinforcement, inhibition, and opponent processing , 1987, Psychobiology.

[20]  Daniel S. Levine,et al.  EFFECTS OF REINFORCEMENT ON KNOWLEDGE RETRIEVAL AND EVALUATION. , 1987 .

[21]  Bernard Roy,et al.  From Optimisation to Multicriteria Decision Aid: Three Main Operational Attitudes , 1976 .

[22]  M. Allais.  Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[23]  D. Levine,et al.  Methodological and theoretical issues in neural network models of frontal cognitive functions. , 1993, The International journal of neuroscience.

[24]  G. F. Tremblay,et al.  The Prefrontal Cortex , 1989, Neurology.

[25]  Wesley R. Elsberry,et al.  Interactions among embedded extensive networks under uncertainty , 1990, 1990 IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[26]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[27]  R. Solomon,et al.  An Opponent-Process Theory of Motivation , 1978 .

[28]  R. Thaler,et al.  Investor Sentiment and the Closed-End Fund Puzzle , 1990 .

[29]  L. Summers,et al.  Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[30]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[31]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[32]  W. Edwards.  Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications , 1992 .

[33]  Adrienne Lehrer,et al.  Frames, Fields, and Contrasts : New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization , 1992 .

[34]  L. Barsalou.  Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields , 1992 .

[35]  E. Rowland.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[36]  G. Bower.  Mood and memory. , 1981, The American psychologist.

[37]  Philippe Vincke,et al.  Description and analysis of some representative interactive multicriteria procedures , 1989 .

[38]  Arthur M. Geoffrion,et al.  An Interactive Approach for Multi-Criterion Optimization, with an Application to the Operation of an Academic Department , 1972 .

[39]  S. Grossberg.  A neural theory of punishment and avoidance, I: Qualitative theory , 1972 .