Parallel Processing of Nociceptive and Non-nociceptive Somatosensory Information in the Human Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortices: Evidence from Dynamic Causal Modeling of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data

Several studies have suggested that, in higher primates, nociceptive somatosensory information is processed in parallel in the primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortices, whereas non-nociceptive somatosensory input is processed serially from S1 to S2. However, evidence suggesting that both nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory inputs are processed in parallel in S1 and S2 also exists. Here, we aimed to clarify whether or not the hierarchical organization of nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory processing in S1 and S2 differs in humans. To address this question, we applied dynamic causal modeling and Bayesian model selection to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data collected during the selective stimulation of nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory afferents in humans. This novel approach allowed us to explore how nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory information flows within the somatosensory system. We found that the neural activities elicited by both nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory stimuli are best explained by models in which the fMRI responses in both S1 and S2 depend on direct thalamocortical projections. These observations indicate that, in humans, both nociceptive and non-nociceptive information are processed in parallel in S1 and S2.

[1]  G. E. Smith The Human Brain , 1924, Nature.

[2]  P R Burgess,et al.  Myelinated afferent fibres responding specifically to noxious stimulation of the skin , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  E. Jones,et al.  Retrograde axonal transport and the demonstration of non‐specific projections to the cerebral cortex and striatum from thalamic intralaminar nuclei in the rat, cat and monkey , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  H. Burton,et al.  The posterior thalamic region and its cortical projection in new world and old world monkeys , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  David P. Friedman,et al.  Representation pattern in the second somatic sensory area of the monkey cerebral cortex , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  R. Treede,et al.  Nerve fibre discharges, cerebral potentials and sensations induced by CO2 laser stimulation. , 1984, Human neurobiology.

[7]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[8]  H Burton,et al.  Second somatic sensory cortical area (sii) in a prosimian primate, galago crassicaudatus , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  J. Kaas,et al.  Corticocortical connections of area 2 of somatosensory cortex in macaque monkeys: A correlative anatomical and electrophysiological study , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  David P. Friedman,et al.  Thalamic connectivity of the second somatosensory area and neighboring somatosensory fields of the lateral sulcus of the macaque , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. I. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating short-latency activity. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  C C Wood,et al.  Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. II. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating long-latency activity. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J D Greenspan,et al.  Anatomic evidence of nociceptive inputs to primary somatosensory cortex: Relationship between spinothalamic terminals and thalamocortical cells in squirrel monkeys , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  Conrad V. Kufta,et al.  Attenuation in detection of somatosensory stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  J. Kaas,et al.  Parallel thalamic activation of the first and second somatosensory areas in prosimian primates and tree shrews , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  M Mishkin,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of tactual information in somatosensory cortex of rhesus monkeys. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  D. Ferrington,et al.  Parallel processing of tactile information in the cerebral cortex of the cat: effect of reversible inactivation of SI on responsiveness of SII neurons. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  L A Krubitzer,et al.  The somatosensory thalamus of monkeys: Cortical connections and a redefinition of nuclei in marmosets , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  A. Vania Apkarian,et al.  Spinothalamocortical projections to the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) in squirrel monkey , 1993, Brain Research.

[20]  R. Hari,et al.  Functional Organization of the Human First and Second Somatosensory Cortices: a Neuromagnetic Study , 1993, The European journal of neuroscience.

[21]  A. Vania Apkarian,et al.  Spinothalamocortical inputs nonpreferentially innervate the superficial and deep cortical layers of SI , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[23]  A. Turman,et al.  PARALLEL ORGANIZATION OF SOMATOSENSORY CORTICAL AREAS I AND II FOR TACTILE PROCESSING , 1996, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[24]  S. Knecht,et al.  Parallel and serial processing of haptic information in man: Effects of parietal lesions on sensorimotor hand function , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  G M Murray,et al.  Parallel processing in cerebral cortex of the marmoset monkey: effect of reversible SI inactivation on tactile responses in SII. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cognitive Conjunction: A New Approach to Brain Activation Experiments , 1997, NeuroImage.

[28]  C. Büchel,et al.  Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Y. Iwamura Hierarchical somatosensory processing , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  E. G. Jones,et al.  Viewpoint: the core and matrix of thalamic organization , 1998, Neuroscience.

[31]  Hiroshi Shibasaki,et al.  Attention modulates both primary and second somatosensory cortical activities in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multisubject fMRI Studies and Conjunction Analyses , 1999, NeuroImage.

[33]  A Schnitzler,et al.  Different cortical organization of visceral and somatic sensation in humans , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[34]  H. Freund,et al.  Parallel activation of primary and secondary somatosensory cortices in human pain processing. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Christian Kleinewächter,et al.  On identification , 2005, Electron. Notes Discret. Math..

[36]  M. Bushnell,et al.  Pain perception: is there a role for primary somatosensory cortex? , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  J. Karhu,et al.  Simultaneous early processing of sensory input in human primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Hiroshi Shibasaki,et al.  Primary somatosensory cortex is actively involved in pain processing in human , 2000, Brain Research.

[39]  G. T. Coleman,et al.  Hierarchical equivalence of somatosensory areas I and II for tactile processing in the cerebral cortex of the marmoset monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Parallel and Serial Processing , 2002 .

[41]  E. Ringelstein,et al.  Changing cortical excitability with low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation can induce sustained disruption of tactile perception , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[42]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[43]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[44]  Carlo A Porro,et al.  Functional Imaging and Pain: Behavior, Perception, and Modulation , 2003, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[45]  Bernd Lütkenhöner,et al.  Magnetoencephalography and its Achilles' heel , 2003, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[46]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[47]  David Caplan,et al.  Cognitive conjunction and cognitive functions , 2004, NeuroImage.

[48]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Serial processing in the human somatosensory system. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  Richard G. Wise,et al.  Lateralisation of nociceptive processing in the human brain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[50]  Vernon B. Mountcastle,et al.  The sensory hand : neural mechanisms of somatic sensation , 2005 .

[51]  André Mouraux,et al.  EEG and laser stimulation as tools for pain research. , 2005, Current opinion in investigational drugs.

[52]  R. Treede,et al.  Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease , 2005, European journal of pain.

[53]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Conjunction revisited , 2005, NeuroImage.

[54]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[55]  Michael T. Lippert,et al.  Mechanisms for Allocating Auditory Attention: An Auditory Saliency Map , 2005, Current Biology.

[56]  Irene Tracey,et al.  The Cerebral Signature for Pain Perception and Its Modulation , 2007, Neuron.

[57]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[58]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling: A generative model of slice timing in fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[59]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Interhemispheric Integration of Visual Processing during Task-Driven Lateralization , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  P. Ulinski Fundamentals of Computational Neuroscience , 2007 .

[61]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Causal Models for Fmri Nonlinear Dynamic Causal Models for Fmri Nonlinear Dynamic Causal Models for Fmri , 2022 .

[62]  C. Segebarth,et al.  Identifying Neural Drivers with Functional MRI: An Electrophysiological Validation , 2008, PLoS biology.

[63]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Cortical Dynamics of Intelligible Speech , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling for fMRI: A two-state model , 2008, NeuroImage.

[65]  O. Salonen,et al.  Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary somatosensory cortex impairs perceptual processing of tactile temporal discrimination , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[66]  N. Logothetis What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , 2008, Nature.

[67]  A. Mouraux,et al.  Nociceptive laser-evoked brain potentials do not reflect nociceptive-specific neural activity. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian model selection for group studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[69]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Functional integration within the human pain system as revealed by Granger causality , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[70]  Karl J. Friston Causal Modelling and Brain Connectivity in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2009, PLoS biology.

[71]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing Families of Dynamic Causal Models , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[72]  A. Mouraux,et al.  Low intensity intra-epidermal electrical stimulation can activate Aδ-nociceptors selectively , 2010, PAIN.

[73]  EEG signatures of auditory activity correlate with simultaneously recorded fMRI responses in humans , 2010, NeuroImage.

[74]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Dynamic Causal Modeling applied to fMRI data shows high reliability , 2010, NeuroImage.

[75]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[76]  M. Seghier,et al.  Reading Aloud Boosts Connectivity through the Putamen , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[77]  Klaas E. Stephan,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling: A critical review of the biophysical and statistical foundations , 2011, NeuroImage.

[78]  Karl J. Friston Dynamic causal modeling and Granger causality Comments on: The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: Model selection, causality and deconvolution , 2011, NeuroImage.

[79]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Reply to Friston and David: After comments on: The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: Model selection, causality and deconvolution , 2011, NeuroImage.

[80]  Gian Domenico Iannetti,et al.  A multisensory investigation of the functional significance of the “pain matrix” , 2011, NeuroImage.

[81]  Olivier David,et al.  fMRI connectivity, meaning and empiricism Comments on: Roebroeck et al. The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: Model selection, causality and deconvolution , 2011, NeuroImage.

[82]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: Model selection, causality and deconvolution , 2011, NeuroImage.