The Health Archetype Language (HAL-42): Interface considerations

In this manuscript we report an evaluation of the reliability of clinical research rules creation by multiple clinicians using the Health Archetype Language (HAL-42) and user interface. HAL-42 is a language which allows real time epidemiological inquiry using automatically derived clinical encodings with any health Ontology. This evaluation used SNOMED CT as the underlying Ontology. The inquiries were performed on a population of 17,731 patients whose 50,000 clinical records have all been fully encoded in SNOMED CT. Four subject matter experts (SMEs) were asked independently to encode and run 10 rules/studies. The inter-rater agreement was 74.8% (p=0.6526) with a Kappa statistic of 0.49217 (p=0.5722). The ten rules were divided into three easy rules, four moderate and three complex rules. There was no significant difference in the SME's agreement when representing easy and complex rules (p=0.6243). We conclude that although the usability of the HAL-42 language is usable enough to achieve reasonable inter-rater reliability, some training will be necessary to reach high levels of reliability for ad hoc queries. We also conclude that SMEs are just as competent to perform complex queries as easy queries of ontologically indexed clinical data.

[1]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Expertise in context: human and machine , 1997 .

[2]  J J Cimino,et al.  Cognitive evaluation of the user interface and vocabulary of an outpatient information system. , 1996, Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium.

[3]  D. Hartfiel,et al.  Understanding , 2003 .

[4]  John Karat,et al.  Iterative usability testing: ensuring a usable clinical workstation , 1997, AMIA.

[5]  Christopher G. Chute,et al.  Standardized problem list generation, utilizing the Mayo canonical vocabulary embedded within the Unified Medical Language System , 1997, AMIA.

[6]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Interface design for health care environments: the role of cognitive science , 1998, AMIA.

[7]  Steven H. Brown,et al.  Evaluation of the content coverage of SNOMED CT: ability of SNOMED clinical terms to represent clinical problem lists. , 2006, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[8]  H. Rex Hartson,et al.  Developing user interfaces: ensuring usability through product & process , 1993 .

[9]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Usability testing in medical informatics: cognitive approaches to evaluation of information systems and user interfaces , 1997, AMIA.

[10]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Cognitive models of directional inference in expert medical reasoning , 1997 .

[11]  V L Patel,et al.  Understanding, Navigating and Communicating Knowledge: Issues and Challenges , 1998, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[12]  Patty Curthoys,et al.  Developing user interfaces: Ensuring usability through product and process , 1997 .

[13]  W. Buxton Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[14]  Charlene R. Weir,et al.  Usability Testing as Evaluation: Development of a Tool. , 1996 .

[15]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.