AAC Assessment and Clinical-Decision Making: The Impact of Experience

People with complex communication needs often require a comprehensive augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) assessment to maximize participation in daily interactions. Assessment of AAC is a complex process and limited practice guidelines exist. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore how 25 speech-language pathologists with varying levels of experience approach the AAC assessment process. Participants were classified as either (a) General Practice Speech-Language Pathologists (GPSLPs), (b) AAC Clinical Specialists (AAC-CS), or (c) AAC Research/Policy Specialists (AAC-RS). In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore the participants’ approach to AAC assessment. The results revealed that GPSLPs approach AAC assessment differently than the AAC-CS and AAC-RS; however, the Specialists reported a similar approach that may help guide the development of practice guidelines for AAC assessment.

[1]  Ella Inglebret,et al.  Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC , 2006, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[2]  R E Owens,et al.  Decision-making processes in augmentative communication. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[3]  J. Montano,et al.  Speech-Language Pathologists' Perceptions of Their Training and Experience in Using Alternative and Augmentative Communication , 2003 .

[4]  K. Hustad,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication for preschool children: intervention goals and use of technology. , 2008, Seminars in speech and language.

[5]  Lyn Richards,et al.  Readme First for a User's Guide to Qualitative Methods , 2002 .

[6]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disorders , 2000 .

[7]  B. Batorowicz,et al.  Teamwork in AAC: Examining Clinical Perceptions , 2011, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[8]  Janice Light,et al.  A Review of Preservice Training in Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Speech-Language Pathologists, Special Education Teachers, and Occupational Therapists , 2010, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[9]  M. Hodge,et al.  Effects of Supplemental Linguistic Cues on the Intelligibility of Severely Dysarthric Speakers , 1995 .

[10]  Janice Light,et al.  Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions , 1988 .

[11]  Laura J. Ball,et al.  Personnel Roles in the AAC Assessment Process , 2012, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[12]  L. Lloyd,et al.  Preparation in augmentative and alternative communication: an update for speech-language pathology training. , 2008, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[13]  David R. Thomas,et al.  A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data , 2006 .

[14]  H. Shane,et al.  Election criteria for the adoption of an augmentative communication system: preliminary considerations. , 1980, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[15]  K. Price,et al.  Elation or frustration? Outcomes following the provision of equipment during the Communication Aids Project: data from one CAP partner centre. , 2008, Child: care, health and development.

[16]  S. Lindsay.  Perceptions of health care workers prescribing augmentative and alternative communication devices to children , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[17]  Emily McFadd,et al.  Qualitative Analysis of Decision Making by Speech-Language Pathologists in the Design of Aided Visual Displays , 2010, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[18]  S. Michlovitz,et al.  Factors That Influence the Clinical Decision Making of Physical Therapists in Choosing a Balance Assessment Approach , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[19]  Dean Sutherland,et al.  AAC use and service provision: A survey of New Zealand speech-language therapists , 2005 .

[20]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Evidence-Based Practice in Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2004 .

[21]  Susan Fager,et al.  AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[22]  Sharon Glennen,et al.  The handbook of augmentative and alternative communication , 1997 .

[23]  P. Benner,et al.  Using the Dreyfus Model of Skill Acquisition to Describe and Interpret Skill Acquisition and Clinical Judgment in Nursing Practice and Education , 2004 .

[24]  J. Nash,et al.  Transdisciplinary training: key components and prerequisites for success. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[25]  D. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative & Alternative Communication: Supporting Children & Adults With Complex Communication Needs , 2006 .

[26]  Siri Wormnæs,et al.  Egyptian Speech Therapists Want More Knowledge About Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2004 .

[27]  Leora R Cherney,et al.  Computerized script training for aphasia: preliminary results. , 2008, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[28]  An AAC Personnel Framework: Adults with Acquired Complex Communication Needs , 2008, Augmentative and alternative communication.