Simulating the Risks from Aircraft Debris to the Public on the Ground

The International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) identify an Airprox to be a situation in which, in the opinion of a pilot or air traffic services personnel, the distance between aircraft as well as their relative positions and speed have been such that the safety of the aircraft involved may have been compromised. These are relatively rare events but they must be reported and investigated in order to reduce future risks. Airprox investigations and similar studies into near-miss incidents focus on the risk to passengers and crew. They do not consider the impact of debris. This raises concerns when, for example, the Bijlmermeer crash led to the deaths of 39 people on the ground. This paper presents a system that was developed to simulate the risks from aircraft debris on ground-based infrastructures. The system was developed and validated with help from Airprox investigators. To this end, a User Centered Design process was applied; analysing the activities and needs of potential users from two European investigation agencies. The following pages present the key design decisions, provide insights into the development process and identify limitations with our existing system. The closing sections identify further applications of this approach and suggest areas for further work.

[1]  J. F. Kelley,et al.  An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications , 1984, TOIS.

[2]  J. K. Rød,et al.  Developing A Spatio-Temporal Ambient Population Estimation Model using Epidemics-based Geosimulation , 2022 .

[3]  George F. Jenks,et al.  ERROR ON CHOROPLETHIC MAPS: DEFINITION, MEASUREMENT, REDUCTION , 1971 .

[4]  Eric Barboni,et al.  A Development Process for Usable Large Scale Interactive Critical Systems: Application to Satellite Ground Segments , 2012, HCSE.

[5]  F. Wilcoxon Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[7]  W. Boyd,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity@@@Risk and Rationality: Philosophical; Foundations for Populist Reforms , 1993 .

[8]  W. M. Hinckley,et al.  Space Shuttle Range Safety Command Destruct System Analysis and Verification. Phase 3. Breakup of Space Shuttle Cluster Via Range Safety Command Destruct System , 1981 .

[9]  Guiyun Zhou,et al.  A web-based geographical information system for crime mapping and decision support , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Computational Problem-Solving (ICCP).

[10]  Keita Emura,et al.  Risk visualization and alerting system: architecture and proof-of-concept implementation , 2013, SESP '13.

[11]  Wayne Jackson,et al.  3D Animation of Recorded Flight Data , 1999 .

[12]  M. Korstanje The Risk Society: Towards a new modernity , 2009 .

[13]  Prostitution In Nevada,et al.  ANNALS of the Association of American Geographers , 1974 .

[14]  René Amalberti,et al.  The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems , 2001 .

[15]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[16]  Christophe Hurter,et al.  FromDaDy: Spreading Aircraft Trajectories Across Views to Support Iterative Queries , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[17]  Peter Brooker,et al.  Air Traffic Management accident risk. Part 1: The limits of realistic modelling , 2006 .

[18]  A.L.C. Roelen,et al.  Causal Risk Models of Air Transport: Comparison of User Needs and Model Capabilities , 2008 .

[19]  P. Kennelly,et al.  Illuminated Choropleth Maps , 2010 .

[20]  Javier Ventura-Traveset EGNOS: European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service , 2003 .

[21]  W. Randolph Franklin,et al.  3-D graphic display of discrete spatial data by prism maps , 1978, SIGGRAPH '78.