Initiate Insulin by Aggressive Titration and Education (INITIATE)

OBJECTIVE—Insulin is often postponed for years because initiation is time-consuming. We sought to compare initiation of insulin individually and in groups with respect to change in A1C and several other parameters in type 2 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A randomized (1:1), multicenter, two-arm, parallel design study with a recruiting period of up to 14 weeks and a 24-week treatment period. Either in groups of 4–8 or individually, using the same personnel and education program, 121 insulin-naive type 2 diabetic patients with an A1C of 7.0–12.0% were randomized to initiate bedtime insulin glargine. The patients visited the treatment center before and at the time of insulin initiation and at 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Patients self-adjusted the insulin dose to achieve a fasting plasma glucose 4.0–5.5 mmol/l. RESULTS—At 24 weeks, mean ± SE A1C had decreased from 8.7 ± 0.2 to 6.9 ± 0.1% in those treated individually and from 8.8 ± 0.2 to 6.8 ± 0.1% in those in groups (not significant [NS]). Insulin doses averaged 62 ± 5 IU and 56 ± 5 IU at 24 weeks (NS), respectively. The frequency of hypoglycemia was similar. The total time (visits and phone calls) spent in initiating insulin in the patients in groups (2.2 ± 0.1 h) was 48% less than in those treated individually (4.2 ± 0.2 h). Diabetes treatment satisfaction improved significantly in both sets of patients. CONCLUSIONS—Similar glycemic control and treatment satisfaction can be achieved by initiating insulin in groups and individually. Starting insulin in groups takes one-half as much time as individual initiation.

[1]  A. Al-Shaikh COMPARISON OF BASAL INSULIN ADDED TO ORAL AGENTS VERSUS TWICE - DAILY PREMIXED INSULIN AS INITIAL INSULIN THERAPY FOR TYPE 2 DIABETES , 2006 .

[2]  H. Yki-Järvinen,et al.  Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study , 2006, Diabetologia.

[3]  M. Davies,et al.  Improvement of glycemic control in subjects with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: comparison of two treatment algorithms using insulin glargine. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[4]  Robert A Gabbay,et al.  Initiating insulin therapy in type 2 Diabetes: a comparison of biphasic and basal insulin analogs. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[5]  J. Rosenstock,et al.  The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[6]  A. Fritsche,et al.  Glimepiride Combined with Morning Insulin Glargine, Bedtime Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin, or Bedtime Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  J. Speight,et al.  Patient perceptions of diabetes and diabetes therapy: assessing quality of life , 2002, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[8]  Rury R Holman,et al.  Sulfonylurea inadequacy: efficacy of addition of insulin over 6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 57). , 2002, Diabetes care.

[9]  H. Yki-Järvinen,et al.  Less nocturnal hypoglycemia and better post-dinner glucose control with bedtime insulin glargine compared with bedtime NPH insulin during insulin combination therapy in type 2 diabetes. HOE 901/3002 Study Group. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[10]  L. Ryysy,et al.  Comparison of Bedtime Insulin Regimens in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  C. Bradley Diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Change version for use alongside status version provides appropriate solution where ceiling effects occur. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[12]  L. Niskanen,et al.  Comparison of insulin regimens in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  D R Taves,et al.  Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups , 1974, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.